Do ‘Eco-Friendly’ Laundry Detergent Sheets Actually Work? This Is What Experts Say

Well+Good 

Laundry detergent products—necessary as they are to clean clothes and keep them fresh—often carry an environmental price tag. Many are formulated with chemical ingredients that are potentially harmful to our health and the environment and come packaged in plastic, a major source of pollution. Consumers hoping to find more eco-friendly cleaning products in order to lighten their load on the planet might have considered replacing those large plastic flagons of laundry detergent in favor of greener alternatives. One product that presents itself as a solution are “eco-friendly” laundry detergent sheets, which are purported to contain fewer ingredients that pollute air and waterways and less plastic.

What are laundry detergent sheets?

Also known as laundry detergent strips or squares, “laundry detergent sheets are highly concentrated, liquid-less detergents designed to replace the typical liquid, powdered, or pod laundry detergent options,” according to Sydney Swanson, a science analyst at the Environmental Working Group (EWG).

Laundry detergent sheets are pre-measured to ensure you aren’t using too much detergent—a common laundry mistake. Typically, one strip is enough for a regular load of laundry, and it will dissolve in the washing machine. Some variations can also serve as dryer sheets, so you don’t need to purchase any, saving you extra money and storage space.

Do dissolvable laundry detergent sheets work?

According to Patric Richardson, host of the Discovery+ show The Laundry Guy and author of Laundry Love and How to Love Your Laundry, the performance of laundry detergent sheets will vary from brand to brand. “You have to try a few options to find one that works for you,” says Richardson. To determine the general quality of laundry detergent sheets before you buy them, you may also find it helpful to read honest reviews written by everyday people on websites or blogs.

Are “eco-friendly” laundry detergent sheets really better for the environment?

In many ways, laundry detergent sheets live up to their eco-friendly credentials. You will commonly find them packaged in small cardboard boxes. “This packaging is often chosen intentionally by companies to avoid contributing to the ongoing plastic pollution crisis,” says Swanson. What’s more, they are usually smaller and lighter weight than the usual dumbbell-heavy detergent bottles, requiring less fuel to ship—and thereby, reducing environmental impact.

However, it’s important to consider that most laundry detergent sheets contain polyvinyl alcohol, or PVA, a water-soluble plastic. While PVA is fully biodegradable, the process can only take place under very specific conditions. Wastewater treatment facilities in the US typically cannot meet these conditions, according to a study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. “PVA can end up back in the environment after the wash cycle, and though some have debated the biodegradability of PVA, EWG does not consider it to be a persistent chemical,” says Swanson—a trade-off for the convenience laundry detergent sheets can offer you.

As with many other cleaning products, some laundry detergent sheets on the market do not fully disclose their ingredient mixture—and for Swanson, transparency is important. “All consumers should know exactly what is in their products so they can make the best decision for their health and the environment,” she says.

What To Look for in an Eco-Friendly Laundry Detergent

Regardless of whether you want to buy laundry detergent sheets, there are a few important features to look for if you want your purchase to be as eco-friendly as possible.

Packaging

First, opt to purchase laundry detergent that is packaged in “cardboard, glass, or aluminum,” says Swanson. “Consumers can even look for refill shops where they can bring their own container to fill with laundry detergent.”

Weight

Secondly, you might also want to purchase a detergent—be it powdered, solid, or ultra-concentrated—that’s marketed to weigh less per load. “These options may use less energy to ship,” she says. For context, a 115-ounce bottle of conventional liquid laundry detergent (which amounts to 60 loads of laundry) might weigh a little over seven pounds. Conversely, a typical box of laundry detergent sheets will weigh much less at under one pound.

Ingredients

You might also want to consider the ingredients list. As a general rule, Richardson says to look for products that use ingredients with names that you can pronounce. “You should be able to read the ingredients and be able to pronounce them and know what they are,” he says. “The more complicated the ingredient names are, the more complicated the product—and that’s when you start dealing with things that you don’t want.”

Common ingredients you might want to avoid, include methylisothiazolinone and benzothiazolinone, which are “aquatic toxicants,” according to Swanson. Unfortunately, many laundry detergents contain aquatic toxicants, and it might seem impossible to avoid them. But what you can do is select products that have as little of them as possible.

Swanson adds that halogenated organic compounds are harmful to the environment as well as ethoxylated surfactants—“they can be contaminated with high levels of 1,4-dioxane, which also does not readily degrade in the environment.” There’s also quaternary ammonium (or quats), another potential aquatic toxicant that’s often found in laundry detergents that double as fabric softeners.

And while fragrance often leaves our clothes fresher smelling, Swanson says “certain fragrances and synthetic musks can be aquatic toxicants and can also release harmful volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere,” adding, “VOCs can deplete the ozone and directly and indirectly contribute to climate change.” If you want to avoid the harmful impact certain fragrances may have on the environment, consider purchasing fragrance-free products.

Environmental certifications

There is no legal or standard definition of what makes a detergent “eco-friendly,” “biodegradable,” or “non-toxic”—“this ‘greenwashing’ is often just a marketing ploy,” says Swanson. Instead of relying on marketing terms, you can refer to the Environmental Working Group’s Guide to Healthy Cleaning, which provides safety ratings for common household products. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also offers a list of safer products on their Safer Choice website to help consumers narrow down their choices.

Another tip from Richardson? Purchase laundry detergent products from brands that you trust. “Stores that you trust vet their products—and they want you to have great products,” he says. “If it doesn’t work, start asking around for other recommendations.”

Eco-friendlier Laundry Detergent Products

Laundry detergent sheets

Beyond, Laundry Detergent Sheets (32 Loads) — $10.00

If you’re looking for laundry detergent sheets, this option from Beyond are a worthy pick. They come packaged in a cardboard box weighing less than a pound, and the product is a USDA-certified biobased, which means at least 25 percent of its ingredients are derived from renewable sources. It is also septic safe. In addition to all these, it’s free of dyes and chlorine bleach, and it’s completely vegan to boot. However, like most laundry detergent sheets, they’re made with PVA, and according to the EWG website (which gives it a B grade), it contains several aquatic toxicants, including sodium coco-sulfate, cocamidopropyl betaine, sodium C14-16 olefin sulfonate, and lauryl glucoside.

The sheets dissolve in both hot and cold water, and according to multiple Amazon reviews, it effectively lifts stains and leaves clothes clean. “These sheets clean as well as anything I’ve used,” one Amazon reviewer wrote. Another reviewer mentioned the fragrance-free formula (pictured above) is also gentle on the skin. “I have pretty sensitive skin and sometimes eczema flare ups—this hasn’t triggered anything,” they proclaimed. If you crave fragrance, it’s also available in a version with a Fresh Linen scent.

Pro

Convenient and easy to use

Con

Made with PVA

Laundry detergent pods

AspenClean, Laundry Detergent Pods (36 Pods) — $18.00

AspenClean’s laundry detergent pods put an eco-friendly spin on traditional versions. The pods are not only plant-based, vegan, and PETA-certified cruelty free, but they’re also EWG verified and Ecocert certified for being environmentally and socially conscious. If anything, the pods are contained in a film made from PVA material—which, as mentioned, isn’t readily biodegradable.

As you might imagine, the pods are easy to use—just toss one in a regular or high-efficiency (HE) washing machine. A single pod should be more than enough for a regular load of laundry, but you may have to use two pods if you want to tackle stubborn stains or you have a large amount of clothes to clean. Regardless, the brand indicates that it will dissolve at any temperature setting, so you can save on precious energy when you do laundry. The version pictured above is fragrance-free, but one reviewer reported that it “cleans well,” despite its lack of scent, and many other shoppers agreed, too. However, there are two fragranced options available—Lavender and Eucalyptus—which are also EWG verified and come in plastic-free packaging.

Pro

EWG verified

Con

Made with PVA

Laundry detergent powder

Ingredients Matter, Laundry Soap Powder (36 Oz.) — $16.00

Simple and straightforward, Ingredients Matter’s laundry detergent powder has a short ingredient list—consisting of just 11 ingredients—plus comes in a recyclable cardboard box. The powder is EPA Safer Choice certified, Leaping Bunny certified for being cruelty free, and the EWG also gave it an A grade. What’s more, it’s safe to use for both regular and HE washing machines, and is even septic safe.

According to multiple reviewers, it can make quick work of removing stains and odors. “It cleans well, leaves no residue, and leaves clothes smelling fresh,” one reviewer wrote. While tough on stains, the laundry detergent powder is gentle on skin, thanks to its hypoallergenic formula. Plus, a little of the stuff goes a long way. You’ll get approximately 72 loads with just one 36-ounce box. The version featured above is free of fragrance, but you can also purchase it in Lavender and Lemongrass scents.

Pro

EPA Safer Choice certified

Con

Messy to use, according to some reviewers

Plastic-free laundry detergent tablets

Blueland, Laundry Starter Set (60 Tablets) — $23.00

Plastic-free laundry detergent isn’t a pipe dream: From its compostable paper packaging to the tablets themselves, there is no plastic present in Blueland’s laundry detergent. The tablets are made without fragrances, dyes, bleach, and other harsh chemicals, and are even vegan and gluten, soy, and nut free. They boast an EPA Safer Choice certification, and they’re also Cradle to Cradle certified, Leaping Bunny certified, and EWG verified. All that, and they’ve been independently tested to perform just as well as conventional laundry detergents.

Reviewers have attested that the product lives up to claims, working wonders to remove stains and unwanted odors. “They seem to get my clothes as clean as anything you can buy in a store, only there’s no big plastic jug to throw in a landfill,” one reviewer raved. Plus, the tablets offer the easy convenience of detergent pods, though multiple reviewers mentioned that the tablets aren’t quick to dissolve, if at all. With the Blueland’s laundry starter kit, you’ll receive 60 laundry tablets, along with a steel tin for storage. Refills are also available on their website when you run out. While perfect in almost every way, the EWG points out that the product’s formula contains alcohol ethoxylated C12-14, which unfortunately, is considered an aquatic toxicant.

Pros

EWG verified

EPA Safer Choice certified

Con

Doesn’t dissolve well, according to some reviewers

4 Ways To Make Laundry Day More Eco-Friendly

1. Use less detergent

Regardless of which laundry detergent you use, Richardson says to use less of it. “You don’t need as much as is very often suggested, and using less product allows it to last longer,” he says. When you aren’t purchasing laundry detergent as often, you’re also doing your part to avoid unnecessary shipping.

2. Do less laundry

“Quite frankly, I wear my jeans nine or 10 times before I wash them,” says Richardson. “The ultimate act of being sustainable with your laundry is just doing it less.” You’ll be using less water, energy, and less product. A win-win-win situation.

3. Wash with cold water

“Laundering in cold water can have a big impact on reducing one’s environmental footprint,” says Swanson. “A large portion of the energy used by a washing machine during the laundering process goes to heating the water.”

When washing clothes in the cold water, opt to use a cold-water detergent for the best clean. Consider pre-treating stains, too. “I’m a huge fan of vinegar to remove stains,” says Richardson. “I just treat stains with a mixture of equal parts white vinegar and water—and for a lot of things, that’s enough.”

4. Air-dry clothes when possible

If the option is available to you, opt to hang-dry clothes instead of baking them in the dryer. “It’s not only better for the environment, but also better for clothes,” Richardson says. “The safer we are on our clothes, the longer they last—and that’s a huge part of sustainability.”

Frequently Asked Questions

Are laundry detergent sheets cheaper than liquid laundry detergent?

Laundry detergent sheets can cost anywhere from $15 to $20 for boxes of 30 or 60 sheets (or $2 or $3 per laundry load), which is comparable to what you might pay for conventional liquid laundry detergents.

What can I use instead of laundry detergent sheets?

There are a wide range of alternatives—like powders, tablets, and liquids—to laundry detergent sheets. As mentioned, if you’re concerned about the environmental impact your product might have, select an option that’s lightweight, packaged in recyclable materials, and made with fewer (and potentially harmful) chemical ingredients.

Read More 

A Malodorous Musk: Twitter employees beg for toilet paper and report a wafting stench on Slack as Elon Musk cuts back on office facilities staff

Business Insider 

Billionaire Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala.

Elon Musk has continually cut costs since taking over Twitter. 
The company’s office in New York is without maintenance staff, leaving bathrooms uncleaned.
IT support employees are also gone, creating gaps in basic needs like computer chargers.

Elon Musk‘s drastic cost cutting at Twitter has some unexpected consequences for employees, including smelly bathrooms and no toilet paper.

Over the last three days, staff in Twitter’s office in the Chelsea neighborhood of New York City have been seeing the effects of the billionaire’s decision to not renegotiate the contracts of facilities maintenance workers who handled in-office supplies and cleaning. Odors from uncleaned bathrooms and several clogged toilets are creeping into hallways and work spaces, according to two people familiar with the stinky situation and messages seen by Insider.

Toilet paper is nowhere to be found in the office, said these people, who asked not to be identified discussing noxious topics. Meanwhile, Musk still requires nearly everyone to work in the office five days a week.

There have been several requests on Slack and by email from employees for someone at the company to rectify the deteriorating bathroom situation, the people familiar said. As of Thursday afternoon, no one had received a response. A spokesperson for Twitter did not reply to a request for comment.

In recent weeks, Musk has been reducing Twitter expenses more than many remaining employees expected, purportedly in an effort to save the company. Several health and wellness benefits have been cut or taken away, free food and office snacks are limited, and office space in San Francisco continues to serve as sleeping quarters and shower space to cut down on hotel costs, while other offices are closed. Even one of Twitter’s three main data servers in the US was abruptly shut down last week to save money, three people familiar with the move said.  

One worker in the New York office said the lack of basic office necessities like toilet paper was “just bad” and further affecting already low morale at the company. Another employee admitted that if no toilet paper is provided by the company by Thursday, workers will likely be forced to bring their own rolls from home, as colleagues briefly had to do in Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters, as noted in a recent New York Times report. A new facilities team was brought in to that office last month, two people familiar with the company said, something that has yet to be afforded to workers in New York.

Another issue that has cropped up due to Musk’s cost cutting is the lack of an internal IT support team. Nearly all of the employees who would help colleagues on issues with work computers and software were either laid off, fired, or have resigned in Musk’s two months of ownership. Remaining staff are left with little to no recourse for common issues ranging from broken computer chargers to accidentally being locked out of internal systems required to do their jobs, the two people familiar said.

It’s frustrating for employees who run into issues, but also a source of anxiety as it can prevent people from working for periods of time. Performance reviews now occur “basically all the time,” one employee said, and high productivity continues to be the main metric for good performance.   

In order to resolve issues, the main course of action is Twitter employees asking for help on one of the few remaining public group channels on Slack, most of which have been shut down (including the channel previously used to discuss health and safety concerns on Twitter). Requests are simply going out in hope that someone in leadership will notice, one of the people said, considering employees do not know who they should be addressing any of their questions or needs to.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read More 

Prince Harry regrets watching Meghan Markle’s ‘love scenes’ in ‘Suits’: ‘Didn’t need to see such things live’

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Prince Harry admitted having regrets watching wife Meghan Markle’s sex scenes from her show “Suits.”

The 38-year-old Duke of Sussex shared in his upcoming memoir “Spare” that he made “the mistake of Googling and watching some of her love scenes online” when he first began dating Markle, 41.

“I’d witnessed her and a castmate mauling each other in some sort of office or conference room,” Harry wrote in the memoir, according to Page Six.

“I didn’t need to see such things live.”

PRINCE HARRY STATES HE WANTS HIS FATHER AND BROTHER ‘BACK,’ ALLEGES PLANTING OF STORIES IN UPCOMING INTERVIEWS

Harry joked that he needed “electric shock therapy” to stop thinking about the former actress’s steamy scenes.

Prior to marrying Harry in May 2018, the Duchess of Sussex starred in the USA series for seven seasons from June 2011 to April 2018.

She played attorney Rachel Zane while Patrick J. Adams portrayed her love interest and eventual husband Mike Ross.

Meghan Markle was married to producer Trevor Engelson from 2011 to 2014. In 2016, Adams married actress Troian Bellisario, who he had been dating since 2010. Adams and the “Pretty Little Liars” alum were in attendance at Harry and Meghan Markle’s royal wedding at St. George’s chapel in London.

In his memoir, Harry also described how his brother Prince William and William’s wife Kate Middleton reacted when he revealed he was dating Markle. The two were first romantically linked in the summer of 2016.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

Harry wrote that he was taken aback when the 40-year-old Prince of Wales allegedly told him to “f— off,” per Page Six.

“I was baffled, until Willy and Kate explained that they were regular — nay, religious — viewers of ‘Suits,'” he claimed. 

Harry added that he didn’t anticipate that his older brother and sister-in-law would “barrage” him with questions about the actress.

“All this time I’d thought Willy and Kate might not welcome Meg into the family, but now I had to worry about them hounding her for an autograph,” he wrote.

The brothers’ formerly close relationship has been strained since Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down from their royal roles in 2020. In his memoir, Harry reportedly also alleges that William physically attacked him during an argument about Markle.

“Spare” is set to be released in the United States Jan. 10.

 

Read More 

 

Health care sector decarbonization to accelerate in 2023: How to do it best

Just In | The Hill 

As health care sustainability enthusiasts, we’re hopeful. Major health care institutions are publicly recognizing both the impact health care sector carbon emissions have on our environment and global health, and the need to do something about it.

In 2021, the New England Journal joined over 200 medical journals in declaring climate change “the greatest threat to global public health.” In 2022, the National Academy of Medicine, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, and The Joint Commission (TJC) all directed resources toward decarbonizing the health care sector. And just this November the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced more than 100 health care organizations signed the Health Sector Climate Pledge.

In 2023, we expect a lot more of the health care sector to join these 102 early adopters. Some will recognize the societal and financial value of eliminating waste, conserving energy and decarbonizing the practice of medicine. Others will be compelled by federal action: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has highlighted the “importance of setting goals for reduced emissions.” We expect thoughtful regulations guiding health care sector decarbonization to follow.

Honing the health care decarbonization metric

HHS’ Health Sector Climate Pledge focuses on absolute emissions reduction until 2030 and then a “net-zero” emission goal by 2050. We strongly prefer an absolute emission reduction metric to “net-zero” for both short and long-term goals.

Consider that an organization mandated to be “net-zero” by 2050 can continue to emit carbon without reduction until 2049. And then in 2050 that organization can continue to emit carbon, account for the carbon it emits, purchase traditional carbon offsets equivalent to the carbon it emits, and claim “net-zero” emissions. “Net-zero” may result in decades of emissions without any reduction.

Even the use of traditional carbon offsets (e.g. paying for solar electricity generation, conserving forests and planting trees) is concerning. Traditional carbon offsets often do not necessarily achieve what they claim: Renewable energy power plants may be built because they’re cost-effective, conserved forests result in the substitution of non-conserved forests for lumber and saplings die before they mature into trees.

If an institution cannot meet an absolute emission reduction goal, we recommend direct capture of carbon as an acceptable, market-based, solution instead of carbon offsets. Direct air capture of carbon sequesters atmospheric carbon into subterranean rock formations. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates the current cost of direct air capture between $134 and $344 per ton. With an average hospital patient generating 45 kg of carbon emissions per day, direct air capture of those emissions could cost as little as $6 per patient per day.

We recommend reasonable absolute emission reductions on a five-year schedule as the primary health care sector decarbonization metric.

High-value, health system-focused decarbonization

From personal experience, we recognize many health care sector institutions including health systems have yet to consider how to decarbonize. High-value health care is fundamental to decarbonization: optimize patient outcomes, eliminate waste. While eliminating carbon emissions entirely from the health care sector may require innovation and time, there are many opportunities to reduce emissions now. We offer three suggestions that can be implemented today to help companies start toward their absolute emission reduction goals:

Telemedicine can be used for many clinic visits. The UK’s National Health Service calculates about 5 percent of its emissions come from patient travel. Optimizing telemedicine will eliminate emissions from transportation and overtime from the construction and maintenance of clinic buildings.

Operating rooms require a high number of emission-intensive, conditioned air exchanges during surgery to maintain sterility. This major source of emissions can be reduced at nights and weekends without impacting clinical care. Other examples of emission-intensive clinical processes with no clinical benefit need to be investigated and disseminated as best practices by TJC.

Preferentially support companies that are actually reducing emissions from their supply chain (not just using carbon offsets). Decarbonization of the $4 trillion health care sector will ripple throughout the global economy as many sustainable practices (e.g. less energy intensive) will be financially superior at scale.

Health care’s future is decarbonized

The health care sector in the United States represents 8.5 percent of U.S. carbon emissions and over 17 percent of U.S. GDP. Decarbonization of the health care sector has started and will accelerate in the new year — billions of dollars will be spent. Early adopters have already signed HHS’ Health Sector Climate Pledge. TJC, CMS and other entities are marshaling their substantial resources to gently compel health care sector institutions to decarbonize. Focusing on “net-zero” emissions may delay emissions reductions and result in money being spent on less effective carbon offsets.

The devil is in the details, and execution matters — decarbonization aligns with high-value health care. We strongly encourage the health care sector to adopt absolute emission reductions as its decarbonization metric, as well as direct carbon capture as the best way to account for emissions when absolute emission reduction targets are not met. We look to the rest of the year with hope that the health care sector can leap from laggard to leader in the climate change public health crisis.

Matthew J. Meyer, MD, is co-chair of UVA Health’s Sustainability Committee and a steering-committee member of Virginia Clinicians for Climate Action. He is also a perioperative sustainability researcher, innovator/inventor and advocate at the University of Virginia.

Bill Shobe, Ph.D., is an environmental economist, professor and the director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Economic and Policy Studies with expertise in carbon emission markets and carbon capture technology.

​Healthcare, Opinion Read More 

Mexican authorities arrest son of notorious drug lord 'El Chapo'



CNN
 — 

Mexican authorities have arrested Ovidio Guzmán, son of notorious drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzmán, a source from the federal government of Mexico told CNN, in a dramatic operation in the northern state of Sinaloa on Thursday that led to clashes around the city of Culiacán.

Guzmán is described as “a high-ranking member of the Sinaloa Cartel” in a press release issued by the United States State Department on December 16, prior to his arrest.

He was previously arrested by federal authorities in October 2019, but was released on the orders of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador to avoid further bloodshed.

Chaos broke out in the city around Guzmán’s arrest on Thursday, with local officials telling citizens to shelter at home amid clashes with cartel members in various parts of Culiacán.

Social media videos appear to show trucks on fire and intense shooting near the airport, which was closed for most of the day due to the violence. CNN has not yet verified these videos.

Passengers appeared to crouch for cover in an Aeromexico plane according to video shared on social media, which was hit by a bullet while grounded in Culiacán.

No injuries were reported, said Aeromexico, which has canceled all its operations to and from the Sinaloan cities of Culiacan, Los Mochis and Mazatlan.

Culiacán International Airport closed after Guzmán’s arrest for security reasons, airport authorities said on their Twitter account.

In a morning address on Thursday, President López Obrador said the operation in Culiacán had been underway since dawn.

As the arrest unfolded, Sinaloa Secretary of Public Security Cristóbal Castañeda said that vehicles were being looted and blockades “are taking place in different parts of the city” as he asked the public not to leave the city.

Members of the National Guard patrol the streets during an operation to arrest Guzmán in Culiacan, Sinaloa state, on January 5.

The state’s education secretary also announced that school and administrative activities had been suspended in Culiacán and urged those who are in a risk area to take refuge in a safe place.

The state of Sinaloa is home to the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the world’s most powerful narcotics trafficking organizations. “El Chapo” was the leader of the cartel before he was sentenced to life in prison in 2020.

The arrest comes days before US President Joe Biden and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau visit Mexico City to attend the North American Leaders Summit.

Capturing Guzmán could be a way for López Obrador to show the US that he is “in control of the armed forces and Mexico’s security situation,” Gladys McCormick, a associate professor at Syracuse University who focuses on Mexico-U.S. relations, told CNN in an email.

“It also defuses the power behind any ask from the Biden administration to stem the tide of fentanyl and other narcotics across the border,” she added.

A burning truck is seen across a street during an operation to arrest Guzmán.

The State Department, which was offering a $5 million reward for information leading to Guzman’s arrest, wrote that law enforcement investigations indicated that Guzmán and his brother, Joaquín Guzmán-López, “inherited a great deal of the narcotics proceeds” following the death of another brother, Edgar Guzmán-López.

They “began investing large amounts of the cash into the purchasing of marijuana in Mexico and cocaine in Colombia. They also began purchasing large amounts of ephedrine from Argentina and arranged for the smuggling of the product into Mexico as they began to experiment with methamphetamine production,” the State Department said.

The brothers are also alleged to oversee an estimated 11 “methamphetamine labs in the state of Sinaloa,” the State Department says.

Their father “El Chapo” Guzmán was convicted in the US in 2019 of 10 counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, drug trafficking and firearms charges. He was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years and ordered to pay $12.6 billion in forfeiture.

Correction: This story has been updated to correct Justin Trudeau’s title.

source

Kevin McCarthy spotted in heated discussion with GOP holdout amid House speaker vote gridlock

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Rep.-elect Kevin McCarthy is having a rough time rounding up enough votes to gain the House speakership, and frustration appears to have boiled over onto one Republican holdout.

CSPAN cameras caught McCarthy talking to Rep.-elect Andy Ogles on the House floor Thursday in an apparent attempt to garner his vote. Ogles, a Tennessee Republican, has repeatedly voted against McCarthy’s speakership bid and appears to have remained steadfast during the discussion.

As McCarthy and Ogles go back and forth during the tense conversation, McCarthy appears to become increasingly more animated and frustrated. However, what was said during the exchange remains unclear. 

THE VOTE FOR HOUSE SPEAKER

WATCH:

McCarthy’s irritation comes after falling short in several rounds of voting for House speaker this week. The California Republican lost the ninth round on Thursday after days of tense negotiations failed to sway any holdouts for the embattled lawmaker.

Since Tuesday, McCarthy has been unsuccessful in securing the 218 votes required to become speaker in nine separate roll calls. 

Nineteen Republicans opposed him in the first two votes on Tuesday. His opposition has grown to 21 after the House Freedom Caucus nominated Florida Republican Byron Donalds and Indiana Republican Victoria Spartz switched her vote from McCarthy to “present.”

During the seventh and eighth ballots Thursday, Rep.-elect Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., cast a surprise vote for former President Donald Trump after he previously voted for Donalds.

In the eighth round, Republican Reps.-elect Lauren Boebert of Colorado and Josh Brecheen of Oklahoma both switched their votes from Donalds to Rep.-elect Kevin Hern, the Republican Study Committee chairman of Oklahoma, who was not officially nominated

Meanwhile, House Democrats have remained united behind incoming House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York, casting all Democratic votes for him in all nine rounds.

 

Read More 

 

NYC Uber drivers strike again for better wages

Just In | The Hill 

Story at a glance

New York City Uber drivers are striking for a second time after the company blocked a pay raise last year.  

Last November, the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission approved a pay raise for ride-hail drivers.  

Uber filed a lawsuit in December blocking the raise arguing it was “dramatic” and would force the company to spend millions extra.

Uber drivers in New York City are taking part in a second 24-hour strike Thursday after the rideshare company blocked a pay raise last month.  

Drivers began striking at 12:01 am Thursday morning and will continue until 11:59 p.m., according to the New York Taxi Workers Alliance (NYTWA), a union representing about 21,000 Lyft, Uber, and Taxi drivers across the five boroughs.  

Along with the strike, the NYTWA has created an online petition in support of drivers’ pay raise which has garnered over 1,600 signatures.  

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.

As part of their first strike in December, drivers blocked rush-hour traffic on the Brooklyn Bridge by forming a caravan.  

In November, the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (NYC TLC) voted to increase the pay of all ride-hail drivers by roughly 7 percent more per minute and 24 percent per mile.  

Inflation in the United States reached a nearly 40-year high last June when consumer prices rose to 9.1 percent higher compared to the same month in 2020.   

The NYC TLC pushed and approved the pay raise for drivers to help address the challenges of higher food, housing and gas prices stemming from inflation.   

Uber took issue with the move and blocked the raise in a Manhattan Supreme Court the following month arguing the pay hike calling it “dramatic, unprecedented and unsupported.” 

In the lawsuit, Uber argued that the pay increase would require the company to spend up to an additional $23 million a month and increase the cost of rides by 10 percent in the city.  

The Thursday strike is happening a day before a New York judge is scheduled to determine if the pay block will continue or be lifted, according to the NYTWA.  

“The city’s for hire drivers have every right to protest Uber’s attempt t deny them the inflation and cost of living pay adjustment that they are rightfully due,” said NYC TLC Commissioner David Do in a statement. “TLC is actively protesting this too, in court.”  

An Uber spokesperson told The Hill that despite the call for a strike, drivers are still using the app.  

During the Thursday morning rush, 1.4 percent more drivers were online than in the same time period over the last two days, according to the spokesperson.  

Rider requests remained “flat” Thursday as well compared to the same time period the last two days as well, they added.  

“Every time the taxi association calls for a strike, drivers demonstrate they’re more interested in delivering for New Yorkers than social media discourse,” the spokesperson said. “Today has been no different.” 

​Equality, Changing America, Respect, labor strike, Manhattan Supreme Court, New York City, NY Taxi Workers Alliance, NYC TLC, Uber, Uber drivers Read More 

Biden: GOP speaker drama 'embarrassing' and 'not my problem'

When asked Tuesday about the Biden’s thoughts on the speakership race, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters President Biden “certainly will not insert himself in that process,” saying the administration was “looking forward to working with congressional colleagues including Democrats, Republicans and Independents this year.”

On Tuesday, a handful of Republicans blocked Kevin McCarthy’s bid for speaker during three straight votes for the gavel, with McCarthy only losing support as the day wore on.

As the House GOP prepares to enter the second day of deliberation, it’s unclear whether McCarthy’s whip count has improved or how Republicans will proceed in their public infighting over the speaker’s gavel.

source