[World] Israel and Palestinians in holy site war of words

BBC News world 

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Media caption,

WATCH: Israeli minister visits contested Jerusalem site surrounded by police

Israeli and Palestinian envoys have traded accusations at a UN meeting over an Israeli minister’s visit to a contested holy site in Jerusalem.

The Palestinian ambassador said Israel displayed “absolute contempt” for the international community, and demanded the UN take action.

His Israeli counterpart accused the Palestinians of mounting “a poisonous campaign” to erase Jewish history.

The minister’s visit on Tuesday was seen by Palestinians as provocative.

It was made by Israel’s new National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right political leader known for past anti-Arab statements and once convicted of incitement to racism.

Mr Ben-Gvir’s visit was his first public act since the government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was sworn in five days earlier.

The hilltop site is the most sacred place in Judaism and the third holiest in Islam. It is known to Jews as the Temple Mount, site of two Biblical temples, and to Muslims as Haram al-Sharif, the site of Muhammad’s ascent to Heaven. The entire compound is considered to be al-Aqsa Mosque by Muslims.

Jews and other non-Muslims are allowed to go to the compound but not pray, though Palestinians see visits by Jews as attempts to change the delicate status quo.

Addressing the emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, Palestinian ambassador Riyad Mansour accused the world body of inaction.

“What red line does Israel need to cross for the Security Council to finally say enough is enough and act accordingly?” he asked. “When are you going to act? It [Israel] has displayed utter disregard for the sanctity of Palestinian life, the sanctity of international law and the sanctity of Haram al-Sharif… yet the council remains on the sidelines.”

“Our people are running out of patience,” he added, warning: “The record shows that Israel’s persistence on this path does not lead to surrender but to uprising.”

“Israeli actions have nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with the unlawful attempt to alter the character, status and identity of the city [Jerusalem]”.

Israel’s ambassador Gilad Erdan responded angrily, saying Palestinian objections were motivated by “Jew-hatred and antisemitism”.

“For years now the Palestinians have orchestrated and advanced a poisonous campaign to obliterate any trace or connection between the Jewish people and the Temple Mount, ” he said. “They exploit every means both in words and actions to promote these lies.”

“This insidious plot,” he said, “comes directly from the top of Palestinian leadership… the personal threats of the Palestinian representative speak volumes.”

He said it was “absurd” that the Security Council had felt it necessary to discuss “the peaceful 13-minute visit of a Jewish minister to the holiest Jewish site”.

“The very fact that this meeting was held is an insult to our intelligence,” he said.

The holy compound is the most sensitive site in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Situated in East Jerusalem, it was captured by Israel from Jordan in the 1967 Middle East war. Under a delicate set of arrangements, Jordan was allowed to continue its historical role as custodian of the site, while Israel assumed control of security and access.

Muslim prayer continued to be the only form of worship allowed there, although a bar on Jewish visits was lifted. Palestinians argue that in recent years, steps have been taken that undermine the status quo, with Orthodox Jewish visitors often seen praying quietly without being stopped by Israeli police.

The number of visits by Jews has swelled in the past few years, something Palestinians claim is part of a surreptitious attempt to take over the site.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Media caption,

Jerusalem’s Temple Mount/ Haram al-Sharif explained

 

Read More 

Hillicon Valley — US official warns of potential Russian cyberattacks

Just In | The Hill 

A top cyber official warned the U.S. against possible Russian cyber threats as the war in Ukraine drags on. 

Meanwhile, Twitter reportedly suffered a breach this week when more than 200 million user accounts, including email addresses, were leaked and posted on a popular online hacking forum. 

This is Hillicon Valley, detailing all you need to know about tech and cyber news from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. Send tips to The Hill’s Rebecca Klar and Ines Kagubare. Someone forward you this newsletter? 

Official: Be ‘vigilant’ over Russian cyber threats

The U.S. needs to remain vigilant in efforts to protect against potential Russian cyberattacks as the war with Ukraine presses on, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Jen Easterly said Thursday.  

Although Russia has not made a significant cyber strike against the U.S. to date since invading Ukraine last year, Easterly said “we can not assume that won’t happen going forward.” 

“It looks like it’s not going to end anytime soon. We need to continue to be vigilant, keep our shields up, and ensure that we are putting all those controls in place,” she said on a panel at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.  

Easterly said Russia miscalculated the war effort, underestimating both the resilience, capability and courage of the Ukrainian army it would face and the united front the U.S. and other allies would put up against Russia. 

Read more here

Twitter accounts leaked in latest hack

More than 200 million Twitter accounts, including email addresses, were leaked this week, raising privacy and security concerns. 

Alan Gal, the co-founder of Israeli security firm Hudson Rock, reportedly first uncovered the leak and took to social media to alert the public. 

“The database contains 235,000,000 unique records of Twitter users and their email addresses and will unfortunately lead to a lot of hacking, targeted phishing, and doxxing,” Gal said on LinkedIn.  

“This is one of the most significant leaks I’ve seen,” he added.  

According to The Washington Post, Gal discovered the leak on a popular online hacking forum but did not provide a name. 

Read more here

ELECTRIC VEHICLE PROTOTYPE UNVEILED 

Sony and Honda unveiled their new electric vehicle prototype called Afeela on Wednesday at the Consumer Electronics Show.  

Sony Honda Mobility CEO Yasuhide Mizuno revealed few details about the prototype, but showcased its more than 40 sensors inside and outside of the car that will help the vehicle detect other objects on the road.  

“Afeela represents our concept of an interaction relationship where people feel the sensation of interactive mobility,” he said.  

Epic Games, the developer behind the popular game Fortnite, and semiconductor company Qualcomm will work with Sony Honda mobility on the project.  

Read more here.

BITS & PIECES

An op-ed to chew on: We don’t do this’: Even Twitter’s censors rejected Adam Schiff’s censorship request 

Notable links from around the web:  

What is generative AI, and why is it suddenly everywhere? (Vox / Rebecca Heilweil) 

French-speaking cybercriminals continue attacks on African banks (CyberScoop / AJ Vicens) 

Tech jobs were hit the hardest by layoffs last year (CNBC / Lauren Feiner) 

One more thing: Peloton reaches $19M deal 

Peloton reached a settlement with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Thursday over its defective treadmills that caused injuries and the company’s failure to report the concerns to the commission. 

Peloton recalled all of its treadmills in 2021 after the death of a child and dozens of other injuries occurred while using the product. In the commission’s press release published Thursday, it announced that Peloton agreed to pay a $19 million civil penalty because the company “knowingly failed” to report that its Tread+ treadmill had a “substantial” hazard that could serious injury to the consumer. 

Peloton received reports of injuries connection with its Tread+ treadmill beginning in December 2018, but did not immediately report the incidents to the commission, according to the release.

By the time the company reported the defective treadmill, there were more than
150 reports of people, pets or objects being pulled under the treadmill, including one child death and 13 injuries, the release states. 

Read more here

That’s it for today, thanks for reading. Check out The Hill’s Technology and Cybersecurity pages for the latest news and coverage. We’ll see you tomorrow.

​Overnight Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity, Overnight Technology, Policy, Technology Read More 

[World] Biden announces new plan to tackle border crisis

Migrant in MexicoImage source, Getty Images
Image caption,

More than 2.5 million migrants have been expelled under Title 42 since 2020.

US President Joe Biden is announcing a new plan to accept up to 30,000 migrants each month in a bid to tackle the border crisis.

Authorities will also expand expulsions under Title 42, a controversial Trump-era policy that has blocked thousands at the US-Mexico border.

The new policy will apply to asylum seekers from Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti and Venezuela.

It is modelled on existing programmes for Venezuelans and Ukrainians.

The announcement comes a day after Mr Biden said he would visit the border next week on his way to Mexico, where he will participate in the North American Leaders’ Summit.

Record number of migrant detentions at the US-Mexico border have presented a growing political headache for Mr Biden. More than two million people were detained at the order in the 2022 fiscal year that ended on 30 September – a 24% jump from the previous year. In December, detentions at the border averaged between 700 and 1,000 each day, not including an increasing number of migrants attempting to leave Cuba and Haiti by sea.

Citizens of Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua – which are facing both economic problems and political repression – accounted for nearly 500,000 of the total.

As part of the new humanitarian “parole” programme, citizens of Nicaragua, Cuba and Haiti will be offered an expanded legal pathway to apply to enter the US, where they will be allowed to live and work for up to two years. To be eligible, migrants must have financial sponsors already in the US, and pass security vetting.

At the same time, migrants who cross the border illegally will rapidly be sent back to Mexico under Title 42, which gives the government power to automatically expel undocumented migrants seeking entry. The policy – which has already been applied 2.5 million times since being implemented as a public health measure in March 2020 – was due to expire in December, but was kept in place by a Supreme Court ruling.

Previously, Mexico’s government only accepted the return of its own citizens under Title 42, along with citizens of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

In October, however, Mexico agreed to accept Venezuelan citizens as part of a programme that saw the US commit to allowing 24,000 people to enter the US legally.

On Thursday, administration officials said that the new programme “builds on the success” of the one aimed at Venezuelans.

“Coupling consistent consequences for those who cross our border with a streamlined legal pathway is proven to reduce irregular migration and facilitate safe, orderly migration,” one official told reporters.

Officials say the Venezuelan programme led to a 90% drop in the number of Venezuelans arriving at the US-Mexico border, and a “dramatic” drop in the number of migrants who choose to risk their lives by using human smugglers.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Media caption,

Watch: No tree or gifts for thousands in this US city this Christmas.

This is a developing story.

source

Energy Department: Keystone XL cancellation cost jobs, but its consumer impacts couldn’t be measured

Just In | The Hill 

A review from the Energy Department determined that the cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline ultimately resulted in fewer jobs, but found the move’s impacts on consumer prices were “inconclusive.”

The department conducted a literature review of several studies on the impacts that the Keystone XL Pipeline would have had, including studies sponsored by the federal government as well as the company behind the pipeline, TC Energy.

On his first day in office, President Biden canceled a permit that was needed for the pipeline’s construction — leading to the project’s ultimate demise. The move sparked praise from environmental organizations but condemnation from Republicans and the energy industry. 

The new report found that the pipeline was expected to create about 50 permanent jobs once it was operational. 

It also said that studies estimated the construction period would support between 16,149 and 59,468 jobs, though it said that the high-end estimate “overstates” jobs because it included jobs outside the United States. 

It also said that estimates of the broader economic impacts “show wide variations” across studies and so they are “not directly comparable” due to major differences in modeling assumptions. Specifically, it said that the impacts on consumer prices were inconclusive in light of changes that have happened in the U.S. and Canadian oil markets since the pipeline was proposed.

The 1,200-mile proposed pipeline would have carried oil from Canada to the U.S.

During 2022’s energy price surge, many Republicans invoked the pipeline’s cancellation in their criticisms of the Biden administration, though its construction was previously not slated to start operating until this year. 

The new assessment was dated December 2022, but was announced by the offices of Republican Sens. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Jim Risch (R-Idaho) on Thursday. 

“The Department of Energy finally admitted to the worst kept secret about the Keystone Pipeline: President Biden’s decision to cancel the Keystone XL Pipeline sacrificed thousands of American jobs,” Risch said in a written statement. 

“The President must turn to American made energy and jobs rather than dictators and despots to fix the energy crisis he created on his first day in office,” he added. 

When Biden canceled the pipeline, he determined it was not in the country’s national interest, citing its climate goals.  

“The United States and the world face a climate crisis. That crisis must be met with action on a scale and at a speed commensurate with the need to avoid setting the world on a dangerous, potentially catastrophic, climate trajectory,” his executive order stated. “Leaving the Keystone XL pipeline permit in place would not be consistent with my Administration’s economic and climate imperatives.”

​Energy & Environment, Energy Department, Keystone XL pipeline Read More 

The US relied on a secret force of Japanese-Americans to win World War II in the Pacific — while their families were locked up at home

Business Insider 

Japanese-Americans are sworn into the US Army at the Granada Colorado Relocation Center in January 1943.

Shortly after the Pearl Harbor attack, the US began sending Japanese-Americans to internment camps.
More than 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry were eventually relocated to the remote camps.
The US Army also recruited soldiers from the camps, relying on them to be translators in the Pacific.

Two months after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and the US entered World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, authorizing the forced relocation of West Coast residents deemed a threat to national security and eventually leading to their internment.

The order did not name a specific ethnic group, but within weeks, the US military began detaining Japanese-Americans. More than 120,000 men, women, and children of Japanese ancestry — two-thirds of them US citizens — were eventually relocated to camps in remote areas, where the majority lived under guard for the rest of the war.

The message behind the policy was as racist and oppressive as it was clear: Japanese immigrants, known as “Issei,” and their American-born offspring, or “Nisei,” were “enemy aliens” who could not be trusted.

The Gila River War Relocation Center southeast of Pheonix, where more than 13,000 Japanese-Americans were interned between 1942 and 1945.

But the US military also knew that to fight Japan effectively, it needed soldiers who spoke Japanese.

As a result, the Army’s Military Intelligence Service trained several thousand American soldiers of Japanese descent at stateside language schools and rushed them to the Pacific to serve as interpreters, translators, and interrogators.

Some 33,000 Nisei served in the US military during the war, most in Europe and North Africa, where their segregated, all-Nisei units were recognized for their formidable fighting.

Yet 4,000 Nisei also served in the Pacific, often under top-secret circumstances. Some were already in the Army when they were recruited for the special training. Others volunteered directly from the barbed-wire compounds of their internment camps.

Japanese-American internees at the Jerome War Relocation Center in southeastern Arkansas.

Attached to combat units, Nisei serving as linguists fought alongside US soldiers and Marines in major battles across the Pacific and China-Burma-India theaters. They earned medals and praise from generals, but they also experienced racism and vitriol.

These Nisei troops, long overlooked, are the subject of bestselling author Bruce Henderson’s newest book, “Bridge to the Sun: The Secret Role of the Japanese Americans Who Fought in the Pacific in World War II.” As Henderson writes, they “fought two wars simultaneously: one against their ancestral homeland; the other against racial prejudice at home.”

Henderson learned of the Nisei while researching his previous book, which documents the service of Jewish boys who fled Europe and joined the US Army to fight the Nazis. He spoke with Insider about the wartime service of Nisei in the Pacific, and why, nearly eight decades years later, it is important to bring their experiences to light.

Japanese-American Nisei soldiers at US Army Military Intelligence Service language school.

Insider: What were some of the similarities between the Ritchie Boys – Jews who returned to fight Germany – and the Nisei in the Pacific?

Henderson: They were both trained in secret by [the Army’s Military Intelligence Service] for identical missions in opposite theaters of war. Each endured prejudice and overcame distrust to become huge assets in our fight against our enemies.

Because they knew the language, the culture, the customs of our enemies better than anyone, they were able to gather valuable intelligence that not only helped win battles — and this is what really came out in my research — but that saved lives.

Not only American lives but also lives of Japanese soldiers and civilians caught up in the war, because they were able to, for example, convince Japanese civilians to, say, leave a cave when these civilians thought it might be better to blow themselves up in this cave than be captured by the Americans, because they had been inundated with propaganda as to what we’d do to them.

President Harry S. Truman presents the Presidential Distinguished Unit Citation banner to the 442nd Regimental Combat Team in July 1946.

Insider: What ultimately compelled you to write “Bridge to the Sun” and highlight the stories of six Nisei serving in the Pacific?

Henderson: I’ve written about the war in the Pacific, but I didn’t know about these military intelligence units being sent over there. I had no idea this took place. So to me it was a real revelation.

I was interested in the dynamic, like what did the GIs over there think of these 10-man Nisei groups that came in? How were they treated? What did they think about? If they had been captured by the enemy, how would they have been treated? It wasn’t unlike what the Jewish Ritchie Boys had been thinking about if they had been captured by the Nazis.

But the root of my interest, and it got even bigger as I did the research, was that we’re in a country that too often pre-judges based on factors like race, religion, ethnicity, countries of origin, things like that. And the wartime service of these Nisei in the Pacific — against their ancestral homeland, and certainly their parents’ homeland — is really dramatic and inspirational.

Not many people know that we had Japanese-Americans fighting the Pacific war. The story of these Japanese-Americans has really been lost in history.

Japanese-American Nisei soldiers take the US Army oath.

Insider: How did the US Army recruit these soldiers?

Henderson: A couple of different ways.

The very first Japanese language school was started by the Army a months before Pearl Harbor. They had about 60 people in the class in San Francisco, and it was done because there was a small cadre of military intelligence officers who had served in Japan in the ’30s, and they knew how complicated the language was — particularly the reading and the writing, but also conversationally.

With all of the tensions building in the Pacific, they realized that if we did go to war, it would be tough to not have teams in the field that had mastery of Japanese. So they had started this very small school with Nisei who were already in the Army.

Insider: How did Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor impact MIS’s initiative and approach?

Henderson: They realized there had to be this great expansion. They started this new school in Minnesota. It couldn’t be on the coast because of the anti-Japanese laws there. Everyone had to be off the coast and put in these camps, and that included soldiers as well.

But they couldn’t recruit the number of people they needed for these units just from the soldiers already in the Army, so they actually went out and started recruiting them at internment camps, which was one of the more incredulous things in my mind: Here you are in a camp with your family, and you’re there because you’re not to be trusted, and here come two officers from the US Army saying “We need you. We want you. We want you to volunteer for the Army so we can train you to go over to help us out in the war against Japan.”

Anti-Japanese sentiment was rampant in the US following Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor.

Insider: I can’t imagine how that must have felt for some of these families: being asked to send their sons to war to defend the same country that was uprooting and interning them. What were the experiences of the Nisei you wrote about?

Henderson: [Young Nisei] were Americans first and foremost. They wanted to participate in this war, and a lot had to get the permission of their parents.

In all of the stories that I saw, it was that the parents, even though they still love Japan and had relatives back there and everything, they told their children, who were born in America: You are American … This is your homeland, and you should fight.

So they got the permission of their immigrant parents to participate in this war, and their parents were very proud.

Nisei soldiers at the US Army Military Intelligence Service’s language school.

Insider: Language was clearly a key part of these roles as interpreters, translators, and interrogators. What did training entail?

Henderson: The training was going to be a year-long program, and what actually came as a surprise for the Army was that not every Japanese-American spoke Japanese fluently … They were born and raised here.

But they found that the “Kibei” – Japanese-Americans who were sent to Japan to go to boarding school for some period of time and then returned to America – were the most valuable. They knew the language and culture, so those guys were recruited especially.

The program that was initially going to be a year was shortened to six months because there was this pressure to get these teams into the units that were being sent to the Pacific. You can’t in six months go from not knowing any Japanese to being fluent.

What they were learning mostly in the training were military terms, Japanese Army organization, how to interrogate a prison of war — what you can and can’t do — and our own military terms and movements and things like that. It was a pretty short program.

Insider: What happened next?

Henderson: They [typically] formed these 10- or 12-man teams … and that team stuck together and went overseas and were attached to either a headquarters or a regiment or a division, or in some cases they were split up to spread out the language capability in the field.

By the end of the war, MIS graduated 6,000 of these Japanese-language interpreters, translators, and interrogators.

A US Army Nisei soldier gives water to a child in Okinawa.

Insider: What were some of the experiences and contributions of the Nisei you featured?

Henderson: Of those three things that they were meant to do, probably what turned out to be the most valuable was the interpreting of the written documents that were found in the field of battle.

Japanese soldiers were not only allowed to, but apparently it was really part of their customs, to write a daily journal, a diary about what was going on. And of course, our guys were specifically told not to do that, and for good reason, because if you’re captured, then the enemy has your diary.

But these guys would write in their journals details about their unit, whether they were hungry, how many were left, what their plans were. And so this stuff was coming off of the field of battle for these language teams to go through and interpret, and they got a lot of valuable information about order of battle and enemy movements.

US Army Nisei soldiers interrogating a Japanese prisoner of war.

Insider: What about the translators and interrogators?

Henderson: The translators and interrogators were also valuable, but in a lot of the battles in the Pacific the Japanese were simply not surrendering, so it was somewhat limited as to what they could do in the field in terms of interrogating prisoners.

But there definitely were times when they did get hold of somebody valuable. One prisoner was a codeman who knew the Japanese Army code, radio code, so when they found that out and reported it to their superiors, this guy was taken off the island and flown to Pearl Harbor to be immediately debriefed by the code guys there to see if he could help at all in terms of breaking some of the war codes.

Kazuo Komoto and first lady Eleanor Roosevelt at a hospital in Fiji in August 1943.

Insider: What stories stand out when it comes to the discrimination and prejudices these soldiers faced?

Henderson: Of the guys that I chose to write about, there was only one still alive when I started my research, Kazuo Komoto. He won the first Purple Heart awarded to a Japanese-American soldier in the war. He was wounded in the Solomon Islands and he ended up in the hospital being visited by Eleanor Roosevelt.

After he got out of the hospital, stateside, he got on a bus and he went to visit his family, who were in Arizona in a relocation camp. He … gets off a stop early in this town, and he wants to take some fresh meat in to his family. He understands that their diet is limited and everything.

So he’s in uniform, and he goes into this small grocery store, to the meat counter, and is looking at the meat. And the butcher says, “I don’t sell to no Japs.” Komoto says, “I’m not a Jap. I’m an American.” The long and short is that Komoto was not going to leave there without getting what he came for.

Gen. Frank Merrill, commander of Merrill’s Marauders, with Japanese-American soldiers.

Insider: What about discrimination within the Army?

Henderson: I have a scene in the book where this 10-man Nisei unit is aboard a troop ship with 2,000 others. For a while they’re kept out of sight, in their own space, their own quarters, and then finally there’s this rumor that we have Japanese prisoners of war aboard and let’s go get them and throw ’em overboard. So somebody decided we better get these guys up and introduce them as troops.

Both in that scene and throughout, there’s an initial presentation, if you will, of this special elite language team that we’re really going to need. They’re really important to our mission, and they’re going to not only help us as GIs stay alive but do our jobs and win our fights. They were looked at as being really valuable.

There were scenes where even a commanding general would say, “Sakamoto, you stick with me.” And by the way, [Second Lt. Tom] Sakamoto was credited with saving a general’s life in one of the battles and even made the newspapers as saving this general’s life.

That doesn’t mean that every individual soldier didn’t have his own thoughts and feelings, I’m sure. But these guys were attached to the Marines. They were at Iwo Jima. They were in Okinawa. They were in Burma. They were in the Solomon Islands.

Every iconic battle in the Pacific that was fought had these guys there, and it was secret at the time and for many, many decades after.

Grant Hirabayashi, right, with a group of Korean women.

Insider: What can we learn from these soldiers’ experiences?

Henderson: Anti-immigrant sentiments are still too prevalent in this country today. I really hope that this book will reflect the untold story of the courage and the sacrifice of these young Nisei men. I hope it will serve as a reminder of the true definition of patriotism.

I came across a quote from [one of the soldiers in the book] Grant Hirabayashi, who after his retirement became a popular speaker. He said that Americanism has nothing to do with a place of origin or color of skin. It has everything to do with spirit and conviction and love of freedom. And the true definition of patriotism, Grant believed, was a citizen fulfilling his right and responsibility.

His direct quote was, “Our constitution is vulnerable. We have to be very vigilant and protect our liberty and freedom.” If that quote isn’t as valid today as it was when he said it back in the 1990s and lived it in the 1940s, I don’t know what is.

Katie Sanders is a journalist based in New York City. Her reporting has brought her to prisons, JDate, the CIA, and the White House. Follow her at @KatieSSanders

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read More 

14-Year-Old Dodge Challenger Dusts Mustang And Camaro By Outselling Both In 2022

Carscoops 

The Dodge Challenger might rest on a 14-year-old platform being on sale since 2008 and have a motor that both sounds like a dinosaur and runs on them, but it’s officially the tyrant king of the muscle car scene for the second straight year. Recently revealed 2022 sales figures from the big three show that it smoked competition from the Ford Mustang and the Chevrolet Camaro.

That’s notable for a whole host of reasons, not least of which is the fact that both the Camaro and Mustang are far more modern. The Camaro was last fully redesigned back in 2016 while the current Mustang platform came out a year earlier in 2015. Since those times, each one has seen numerous hardware and software improvements.

The Challenger hasn’t rested completely on its laurels but it’s certainly leveraged its old-school cool styling and drivetrain to the full. Dodge is the only one of the three to offer its muscle car without a fuel-efficiency-focused four-cylinder engine. Despite that, it led the three in 2022 with 55,060 Challenger sales. Ford came in second by selling 47,566 Mustangs and Chevrolet was far behind with just 24,652 Camaro sales in 2022.

More: Dodge To Unveil Final Last Call Challenger Special On March 20th

Interestingly, of the three muscle cars, Chevrolet ended up with the largest increase in sales over 2021 with a 12 percent bump. Ford is the only one of the three to see a drop off in popularity, a 9 percent drop off, from last year’s high of 52,414 units. Some of that might have to do with the fact that buyers could be waiting for the all-new 2024 Mustang to make its way to dealers.

The Challenger and its four-door brethren the Charger accounted for the only increase in sales that Dodge experienced this year. The Durango was down 12 percent while the rest of the lineup basically went out of production. It’ll be interesting to see how things shake out for Dodge over the next year or two.

We expect to see the wraps come off of the very last “Last Call” Dodge Charger later this year. Once it and the Challenger leave production, Dodge will need to migrate its customers to a largely new lineup with new technology.

Read More 

Tyler Boyd says he ‘stayed on’ Tee Higgins following Damar Hamlin incident

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Tears flooded the field while Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin underwent CPR during Monday night’s game — the NFL has since implemented plenty of mental health resources throughout the league.

Tee Higgins of the Cincinnati Bengals was the last person to make contact with Hamlin before he went into cardiac arrest. As thoughts and prayers went out to Hamlin, many made it a point to remind the Bengals receiver that he was not at fault for what happened.

One of those many was Higgins’ teammate, fellow receiver Tyler Boyd.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Higgins received “disrespectful” criticism, Boyd told reporters on Thursday, so he wanted to make sure his teammate was doing all right.

“Tee got a good head on his shoulders, and he kind of didn’t take it too bad, but I just stayed on him because I know how much he felt after the game about it,” Boyd said. “There was a lot of things on Twitter and social media, but I know it’s not his fault at all. With all that politics and whoever’s saying whatever they’re saying is wrong for that. It’s very disrespectful, I feel like, because Tee’s a human being, too. It could’ve flipped. It could’ve been Tee. It’s football, at the end of the day. I felt for him.”

Boyd said he saw “everybody giving Tee crap,” but he knew how badly Higgins felt, considering both receivers’ relationship with Hamlin before Monday.

HOSPITAL PRAISES BILLS MEDICAL STAFF FOR ‘TEXTBOOK EXECUTION’ TENDING TO DAMAR HAMLIN

“People don’t really know the relationship that he was building with him. I brought him to my camp with D Hamlin, they became friends, and they probably knew each other prior to that because they was playing against each other,” Boyd said, adding that the relationship between all three players was “always genuine.”

Boyd said there was friendly trash talk from Hamlin to both Boyd and Higgins, and Boyd and Hamlin even planned to swap jerseys after the game.

Higgins, says Boyd, like everyone else, was happy to hear about the positive revelations in Hamlin’s status.

“He’s doing good now that Hamlin’s OK, so that’s the biggest thing,” said Boyd.

Hamlin has woken up, responded to doctors’ orders and communicated with them via writing, asking doctors who won Monday night’s game.

 

Read More 

 

Funeral home operators sentenced after illegally selling body parts



CNN
 — 

Two funeral home operators in Colorado were sentenced Wednesday for illegally selling bodies and body parts without the families’ consent, the US Attorney’s Office said.

Megan Hess was sentenced to 20 years in prison and her mother, Shirley Koch, received 15 years for their involvement in the scheme to sell the human remains to body broker services, according to federal prosecutors. They each pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and aiding and abetting.

“These two women preyed on vulnerable victims who turned to them in a time of grief and sadness. But instead of offering guidance, these greedy women betrayed the trust of hundreds of victims and mutilated their loved ones,” Leonard Carollo, the acting special agent in charge at the FBI in Denver, said in a news release.

“Without knowledge or consent, the women disrespected the wishes of the grieving victims and degraded the bodies of their family members to sell them for profit,” Carollo said.

The women ran Sunset Mesa Funeral Home in Montrose, Colorado. From 2010 through 2018, they would meet with people seeking cremation services either for themselves or their loved ones, according to the plea agreement.

Nine-year-old Lyric Jones and her mother, Teran Christian, stand outside the courthouse in Grand Junction, Colorado, on Tuesday. Christian's grandfather was one of the victims at Sunset Mesa Funeral Home.

“In many instances, Koch and Hess neither discussed nor obtained authorization for donation of decedents’ bodies or body parts for body broker services,” the news release said. “In other instances, the topic of donation was raised by Hess or Koch, and specifically rejected by the families. In such circumstances, despite lacking any authorization, Koch and Hess recovered body parts from, or otherwise prepared entire bodies of hundreds of decedents for body broker services.”

Even when families agreed to donation, the news release said, Hess and Koch sometimes sold the remains beyond what the family had authorized.

The two women also delivered cremated remains to families that did not belong to the families’ loved ones, the news release said.

In some cases, the pair would ship bodies and body parts that tested positive for or belonged to people who had died from infectious diseases – such as Hepatitis B and C and HIV – after certifying to buyers that the remains were disease-free, the news release said.

The shipments went through the mail or on commercial air flights in violation of Department of Transportation regulations regarding the transportation of hazardous materials,the news release said.

“The defendants’ conduct was horrific and morbid and driven by greed, US Attorney Cole Finegan said. “They took advantage of numerous victims who were at their lowest point given the recent loss of a loved one. We hope these prison sentences will bring the victim’s family members some amount of peace as they move forward in the grieving process.”

An attorney for Koch, Thomas E. Goodreid, declined to comment.

CNN has reached out to an attorney for Hess for comment.

source

Giving away more power did nothing for Kevin McCarthy, who lost his 10th House speaker ballot after further bowing to dissidents’ demands

Business Insider 

Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California wades through reporters on the way to the House floor.

Kevin McCarthy kept flailing Thursday as 20 House conservatives torched four more speaker ballots.
McCarthy agreed to some of their procedural demands overnight but that wasn’t good enough.
Should he ever succeed, McCarthy’s role may be wildly diminished by all these concessions.

Rep.-elect Kevin McCarthy’s latest attempt at kowtowing to the 20 conservatives who’ve so far stymied his House speaker bid backfired Thursday as he lost four more ballots following a long, fruitless night of ceding power to try and end a politically debilitating stalemate. 

Having shed ground throughout the week, the California Republican and his allies closed out their terrible Wednesday (three failed ballots) by reaching out to anti-McCarthy activists like Reps.-elect Chip Roy of Texas and repeat speaker challenger Byron Donalds of Florida to find a way out of the brutal leadership fight. 

McCarthy’s reward for all the late-night groveling? Most of the increasingly emboldened holdouts stuck behind Donalds for the second day in a row.

The biggest changes have been among key McCarthy agitators: Rep.-elect Matt Gaetz of Florida voted for former President Donald Trump twice, and Reps.-elect Lauren Boebert of Colorado and Josh Brecheen of Oklahoma threw their support behind Rep.-elect Kevin Hern of Oklahoma, the incoming chair of the influential Republican Study Committee, during the seventh and eighth ballots. 

By the tenth ballot, Hern had peeled off a few more defectors from Donalds, winding up with seven votes. Hern has thus far supported McCarthy, but previously hinted that he would consider taking a go at the top post.

“If I hear my name, it’s something I’ll have to think and pray about before deciding if it’s a job I’ll run for,” Hern told The Frontier’s Reese Gorman.

Boebert twisted the knife further when she switched her support from Donalds to Hern by saying she was voting for “Kevin.”

—Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) January 5, 2023

McCarthy’s running tally also shrank by one vote to 200 after Rep.-elect Ken Buck left town for what his staff said was “a planned non-emergency medical procedure.” A Buck aide told Insider that the Colorado Republican would be busy “the rest of today and most of tomorrow,” likely taking him out of the voting mix until this weekend. 

Ask and ye shall receive

McCarthy began the now months-long negotiations by opposing any effort to make it easier for rank-and-file lawmakers to topple a speaker. 

Republican Rep.-elect Dan Crenshaw of Texas previously compared bringing back the procedural maneuver to governing “with a gun to your head.”

“There’s a reason [the motion to vacate] already got debated. You can’t govern with a gun to your head and that is what they are asking for. It makes us highly unstable, and it lays out the potential too for Democrats to take advantage of this and create absolute chaos,” Crenshaw told CNN in December.

According to multiple reports, McCarthy has now agreed to let a single House Republican wield that power. The archaic “motion to vacate,” which is essentially a no-confidence vote, has only ever been voted on once, but then-Rep. Mark Meadows’ introduction of it in 2015 set off a chain of events that led conservative rabble-rousers to push then-Speaker John Boehner into retirement.

Republican Rep.-elect Josh Gottheimer, who was once a thorn in House Democrats’ side, said the GOP could be in for chaos if talks continue on their current trajectory.

“If they cave to the far-right extremists on the motion to vacate, and continue to give away the store on committees and rules, Congress could be forced into a gridlock nightmare,” Gottheimer of New Jersey told Politico.

Beyond the sword potentially falling on his head, McCarthy has also acquiesced to horsetrading that could alter the House’s daily rhythms.

According to multiple reports, McCarthy will allow up to four of the holdouts to sit on the House Rules Committee, the panel that sets the procedural steps necessary for legislation to be considered on the House floor. Depending on lawmakers’ desires, the rules panel can set requirements that would effectively kill a bill with endless amendments or assure it safe passage.

All of these concessions are critical when it comes to what House lawmakers will actually have to do in the months ahead.

Most notably, Congress will need to raise the debt ceiling later this year or risk a default that would send US and international markets into a tailspin. Conservatives loathe raising the debt ceiling without significant spending cuts but their leverage is weakened by the reality of a Democratic Senate and White House. This almost certainly means McCarthy would need to rely on House Democrats, a scenario that has doomed past GOP speakers.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read More