Black drivers are more frequently searched during traffic stops without finding contraband than white drivers, according to a new study.
Researchers analyzed data from 98 million traffic stops, and found that innocent Black drivers were likely to be searched about 3.4 to 4.5% of the time while innocent white drivers were likely to be searched about 1.9 to 2.7% of the time.
“We show that there’s this pervasive bias in multiple states and multiple counties across different stop and search reasons that we need to understand,” says Maggie Meyer, a doctoral candidate in psychology at the Institute for Social Research (ISR) at the University of Michigan. “We’re not the first people to find racial bias in policing and we won’t be the last, but hopefully, this gives a clear place to intervene.”
Meyer and Richard Gonzalez, a professor of psychology and director of the Research Center for Group Dynamics at ISR, used data from the Stanford Open Policing Project, a database of traffic stops from law enforcement agencies across the country. They examined traffic stops in 14 state police departments and 11 local law enforcement departments between the years 1999 and 2017.
Meyer says that, for example, in Durham County, North Carolina, the false alarm rate for Black drivers ranges from 6 to 8% while the false alarm rate for white drivers is 3 to 4%. This equates to 11,000 Black drivers compared to about 2,500 white drivers who are searched while innocent.
“We know that there’s at least this 2% difference at most, where the two values are the closest. That’s where we can start to make these claims of bias,” Meyer says. “The really powerful part about these data is that these findings aren’t massive—they’re not 30, 40%, they’re 2, 3, 4, 5%. But at 98 million traffic stops across 14 states, that’s still a very large and meaningful number of innocent drivers who are searched.”
Officers’ decisions result in tradeoffs between the probability of contraband in the population, the probability of finding contraband among those the officer selects to search, and the costs of making errors such as failing to search someone with contraband and needlessly searching someone without contraband, Gonzalez says.
The researchers had three pieces of information about these traffic stops: the total number of traffic stops during the time period in a given county or state, whether the officer searched their car, and whether they found contraband. They don’t know whether drivers who weren’t searched held contraband.
To account for this unknown, the researchers developed what they call the Overlapping Condition Test. They base this test on a standard descriptive tool in statistics called a 2×2 table. This table allows researchers to jointly evaluate a decision and an outcome. To do this, researchers use hit rates and false alarm rates.
In this context, hit rate is a measure of officer accuracy that depends on the contraband rate on any driver that was stopped, even if they were not searched. False alarm rates refer to the proportion of drivers officers search but do not find contraband, and it depends on the total number of innocent drivers that were stopped—even if they were not searched.
In this 2×2 table, the researchers filled in these known pieces of information: whether the officer searched and whether the officer found contraband when they searched. The researchers explored the possible values of the missing information—whether the drivers who were not searched had contraband or not.
“It’s analogous to presidential elections with the electoral college. An election can be called because one candidate already has enough electoral votes to win, even though all of us haven’t been counted,” Gonzalez says. “So even though there may still be missing information, the outcome of the election is set. Even if those uncounted votes went for the other candidate, one candidate has already got it in the bag.”
The researchers say their method can be used to inform policy to help mitigate the issue.
“We can move forward. We can say, ‘Hey, there’s a problem. We have to think about policy,”‘ Gonzalez says. “We have to figure out why officers are searching innocent Blacks more than innocent whites. We don’t need to wait until we know the actual values of the missing information, because it doesn’t matter what they are. The bias is there.”
The study is published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology.
Source: University of Michigan
Author Profile
- "Center" Bias Rating
- Futurity is a nonprofit website that aggregates news articles about scientific research conducted at prominent universities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Europe, Asia, and Australia. It is hosted and edited by the University of Rochester.
