White House restrains its glee as it watches McCarthy meltdown

Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories 

Staff throughout the West Wing wouldn’t cop to watching live coverage of Rep. Kevin McCarthy failing to get enough votes to become speaker of the House. But, to a person, they were more than aware of the fiasco that was unfolding on the House floor throughout the day, and on the TV sets in practically every office.

At Tuesday’s briefing, the first of the year, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre refused to comment on the speaker’s election, demurely batting away several questions about McCarthy’s humiliation and the new House GOP’s majority appearing to be every bit the chaos caucus many feared.

But make no mistake: this administration is about as distraught over all this as a flock of vultures happening upon a freshly killed gazelle. For whatever headaches a Republican-controlled House will create for President Joe Biden through investigations and its ability to control the floor, the disorder and rancor likely to characterize the new GOP majority, administration aides believe, will benefit the president politically.

Administration aides are confident that the president, by focusing on governing and working in a bipartisan manner, is delivering what the public wants — and that Republicans, as long as they’re continually bogged down by intra-party fights, are not.

“The Republican Party is almost non-functional right now,” said Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas). “They can’t even agree on who should lead them. It’s not just a matter for the Republicans in Congress. It affects the whole country, and we can’t even take a vote on anything else until they decide who the speaker is.”

Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.), who contemplated a Snickers bar dinner if voting ran into the late evening, marveled at the absurdity of it all as McCarthy failed to pick up more votes. He quipped that Republicans “should probably nominate Bill Murray at this point.”

“I think we’re kind of enjoying watching this. There’s something about it. It’s interesting,” he said.

While countless House Democrats spent much of the day reveling in the disarray across the aisle, the White House presented more of a straight face, at least publicly. But the administration is wasting no time focusing the country’s attention on this contrast, even if Biden is presenting it implicitly — not by hammering Republicans as extreme but by demonstrating his own ability to deliver on bipartisan legislation.

“Based on what is going on today, their ability to govern and pass legislation on their own, I think is tenuous at best,” said Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.). “When you bend everything to an ideological position, as opposed to the work of Congress, this is what you end up with.”

Biden’s first big event of the year Wednesday, a trip to Kentucky to highlight a long-sought bridge repair alongside Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell, will typify his approach over the year ahead: focusing on the increasingly tangible benefits from the bipartisan 2021 infrastructure overhaul and last year’s bills to boost semiconductor manufacturing, lower drug costs and hasten the transition to electric vehicles and renewable energy. Two border-state governors, Kentucky Democrat Andy Beshear and Ohio Republican Mike DeWine, will also attend the event, allowing Biden to underline the bipartisan nature of the law responsible for fixing the Brent Spence Bridge.

And on Friday, the president will mark the two-year anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection with a speech at the White House. The occasion will provide another chance to articulate a view about the sanctity of American democracy — while reminding the country which party was responsible.

Jean-Pierre wouldn’t say whether this week’s presidential events were orchestrated with an eye on the anticipated messy floor vote in the House, but her emphasis on the bipartisan nature of the work Biden and McConnell planned to highlight was not subtle.

“We can do big profound things for the country when we work together,” she said.

But behind the bromides, there was some bubbling concern about the chaos unfolding on the House floor.

Staffers who spoke more candidly, on the condition of anonymity, acknowledged that bipartisan legislation will be more difficult with Republicans controlling the House, however narrow and fractious their majority. Debt ceiling fights become even trickier when there is no order at all.

That said, some aides remain cautiously optimistic that some GOP lawmakers from more competitive districts will be incentivized to work across the aisle. Deputy press secretary Andrew Bates wrote in a post-election bulletin to reporters that the House Republicans who voted for the president’s infrastructure law in 2021 all won reelection in November.

The president and his aides, in ways public and private, will continue to brand the GOP by highlighting the behavior of its more extreme voices — the “MAGA Republicans,” as Biden has labeled them — while still reaching out to Republicans who might work more constructively with Democrats, White House staffers said. Part of that effort, they noted, will include reminding Republicans of the popularity of Biden’s policy achievements.

If House Republicans follow through on promises to roll-back elements of the Inflation Reduction Act and weaken remaining abortion protections, the White House is confident that those efforts will benefit Democrats politically, not to mention be blocked by a Democrat-controlled Senate.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), one of the hard-liners refusing to back McCarthy, dismissed such actions as “messaging bills” during a press conference Tuesday. And, in a comment sure to be clipped and saved by the White House press shop, belittled the coming GOP investigations of Hunter Biden and other matters as “theater pretending to be oversight.”

And there is no immediate threat of a government shutdown after last month’s passage of a $1.7 trillion omnibus spending package, an achievement propelled in large part by Senate Republicans who foresaw the coming chaos of a GOP-controlled House. In fact, as McCarthy struggled to secure the speaker’s gavel Tuesday, some Senate Republicans expressed vindication about having passed the bipartisan legislation last year, spiking the football on House Republicans harder than anyone at the White House did.

“I’ve been told you shouldn’t vote for the $1.7 trillion spending bill because the House is Republican, they’ll make it better,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). “I don’t think that theory is holding up too well.”

​ Read More 

20th GOP opponent to McCarthy explains his vote for Jordan 

Just In | The Hill 

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.)switched his vote for Speaker during a third vote for the leadership position on Tuesday, bringing the number of GOP lawmakers against House Republican leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) to 20. 

“The reality is Rep. Kevin McCarthy doesn’t have the votes. I committed my support to him publicly and for two votes on the House Floor,” Donalds wrote on Twitter as the House gaveled yet another Speaker vote without a winner.  

Nineteen Republicans voted against McCarthy in the first and second voting bouts, and Donalds switched his vote to become the 20th vote against him in the third, casting his ballot for Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).

“218 is the number, and currently, no one is there. Our conference needs to recess and huddle and find someone or work out the next steps…but these continuous votes aren’t working for anyone,” said Donalds, who had earned a single vote himself during the first round of ballots.  

Democrat Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.) has come out ahead in all three consecutive votes, but no candidate has earned the necessary 218 to win the top leadership slot.  

“When the dust settles, we will have a Republican Speaker, now is the time for our conference to debate and come to a consensus… This will take time, Democracy is messy at times, but we will be ready to govern on behalf of the American people. Debate is healthy,” Donalds said.  

Talking to reporters after the third vote, Donalds suggested that the party needs to find another GOP option, and didn’t rule out the Speakership for himself.  

“This is not a surprise. We knew that Kevin [McCarthy] was short. My concern has been like look, it’s been two months, bro, you got to close the deal. You got two months. And so at this point now is that if you can’t close it, we got to find who can,” Donalds said. 

Tuesday marks the first time a Speaker election has pushed into multiple rounds of voting in a century, and the voting will continue until a candidate crosses the 218-ballot threshold to secure a majority of lawmakers’ support.  

The House on Tuesday adjourned after the third vote was tallied and stands in recess until noon Wednesday.

Republicans in the new Congress control a slim majority of 222 seats, a margin that has left McCarthy with little room for dissenters within his own party in his Speakership bid.

Democrats control 212 seats, plus a vacant seat left by the death of former Rep. Donald McEachin (D-Va.). That seat will be filled after a special election at the end of February.

​House, Byron Donalds, Hakeem Jeffries, House speaker, House Speaker vote, Kevin McCarthy Read More 

Damar Hamlin injury tests ESPN with terrifying live television moment

Just In | The Hill 

It took the National Football League nearly an hour to officially suspend Monday night’s game between the Buffalo Bills and Cincinnati Bengals after Damar Hamlin suffered a frightening injury that caused him to collapse on the field. 

But the injury posed a more immediate test for ESPN, which had to respond in real time with millions watching, as Hamlin, a defensive back on the Buffalo Bills, went down in the first quarter after laying a hit on Bengals wide receiver Tee Higgins.

ESPN’s cameras captured Hamlin quickly standing up after delivering the blow on Higgins, before almost instantly collapsing on his back and lying motionless on the field. 

ESPN quickly cut to a commercial break, a relatively standard procedure after injuries on the field, and showed a replay of the hit twice for its audience once it returned to what had become a somber scene in Cincinnati. 

By then it had already become clear to everyone on the field, and those watching at home, that Hamlin’s life was in jeopardy. 

“We have an obligation to respect the player’s privacy in a situation like that. So, we keep a respectful distance,” a spokesperson for ESPN told The Hill on Tuesday. “We made the decision to show two angles in one replay and decided to not go back to it out of respect for Damar Hamlin. This is our typical protocol for any significant injury/illness.” 

As medical personnel attended to Hamlin, several of his concerned teammates fell to their knees, many of them visibly distraught with tears in their eyes, praying and consoling one another as the young player was administered CPR on the field. 

With Hamlin down for more than eight minutes and a crowd of thousands nearly silent as he was rushed away by ambulance that had been driven onto the field, ESPN’s play-by-play crew of Joe Buck and Troy Aikman worked with sideline reporter Lisa Salters to piece together what had happened to Hamlin and what the status of the game would be moving forward. 

“My natural instinct at that moment is not to talk,” Buck told the New York Post on Monday evening after the game was suspended. “That’s the last thing I want to do is to put my words to this serious situation. It’s very counterintuitive as the football play-by-play guy about somebody having CPR administered to him in the center of a stadium with 65,000 people in it and a national television audience. It’s just a weird place to be.” 

Eventually, ESPN cut to a panel of studio hosts who sat dumbfounded at what they had witnessed and without a clue what would happen next. 

“We play a violent game. You just hate to see it, I just pray for the young man and pray for his family. That’s all I can say right now and all I know how to do,” former pro football player turned pundit Booger McFarland said, shaking his head. “I think we reached a point where nobody is concerned about football anymore tonight.” 

After Hamlin was transported to a local hospital, the NFL announced the game would be suspended for the night and the Bills announced the player had undergone cardiac arrest after the hit. He remained in critical condition as of Tuesday, and the NFL said the game will not resume this week. 

Within minutes of the injury, major news networks like CNN, Fox News and MSNBC cut in with live coverage of the unprecedented situation involving an athlete in the country’s most popular and profitable sports league. 

Media observers noted overnight Monday the difficulty of the situation ESPN was placed in, needing to fill airtime on live television instead of covering one of the biggest games of the NFL’s season, as speculation about Hamlin’s injury and the status of the game swirled on social media. 

“Tonight is a night you really want thoughtful people on air. You want people who don’t speculate. You want people with basic humanity,” Richard Deitsch, a leading sports media critic wrote on Twitter Monday evening, adding that ESPN’s on-air personalities had passed the test. 

“The fact they didn’t really do anything wrong is commendable, it’s easy to get stuff wrong and you’re on one of the most watched programs of the week and you’re in the social media age where any simple wrong word will be dissected and criticized,” J.A. Adande, the director of sports journalism at Northwestern University’s Medill School, told The Hill on Tuesday. 

Adande, who spent a decade working for ESPN and remains a regular panelist on its daytime talk show “Around the Horn,” said the decision not to show the replay of the hit was the right thing to do. 

“Not showing the replay, not speculating even to the point of maybe under reporting, but that’s better than being erroneous,” he said. 

However, the Hamlin injury spurred plenty of controversy. ESPN reported moments after the safety went down, citing the NFL, that referees for the game had suggested both teams take a five minute “warm up” period before play would resume. 

The NFL pushed back on that reporting on Tuesday morning and said the game would not be finished this week. 

“There was constant communication in real time between ESPN and league and game officials,” ESPN said in a separate statement on Tuesday.  “As a result of that, we reported what we were told in the moment and immediately updated fans as new information was learned. This was an unprecedented, rapidly evolving circumstance. All night long, we refrained from speculation.”

​Media, News, damar hamlin, ESPN, National Football League Read More 

US Soccer probes alleged Gregg Berhalter incident from 90s after apparent blackmail plot

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

United States Soccer is conducting an investigation into an apparent “physical incident” between Gregg Berhalter and his wife from the fall of 1991.

An unverified Twitter account that seems to belong to the USMNT head coach released a lengthy statement on Tuesday, in its first tweet, that explains the incident in question where Berhalter kicked his wife, Rosalind, in the legs when he was 18 years old.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

The account also references an individual who contacted U.S. Soccer “saying that they had information about me that would ‘take me down’ – an apparent effort to leverage something very personal from long ago to bring about the end of my relationship with U.S. Soccer” during the World Cup.

“Now is the time for me to publicly share some personal information which a third party has used against my family and me,” the statement reads.

The statement said the incident happened when Berhalter was a freshman in college, and the two had been dating for four months “when an incident happened between us that would shape the future of our relationship.”

“One night, while out drinking at a local bar, Rosalind and I had a heated argument that continued outside. It became physical and I kicked her in the legs,” the statement read.

“There are zero excuses for my actions that night; it was a shameful moment and one that I regret to this day. At that time, I immediately apologized to Rosalind, but understandably, she wanted nothing to do with me. I told my parents, family, and friends what happened because I wanted to take full responsibility for my behavior. Rosalind also informed her parents, family, and friends. While the authorities were never involved in this matter, I voluntarily sought out counseling to help learn, grow and improve – one of the most valuable decisions that I ever made. To this day, the type of behavior has never been repeated.”

CRISTIANO RONALDO SIGNS DEAL WORTH $75 MILLION PER SEASON WITH SAUDI ARABIAN CLUB

The statement also says the incident “shaped me, but doesn’t define me.”

U.S. Soccer said in a statement of their own they were made aware of the allegation on Dec. 11 and “appreciate Gregg and Rosalind coming forward to speak openly about this incident.” 

They hired Alston & Bird LLP to conduct an independent investigation immediately upon being made aware of the incident, and they have “learned about potential inappropriate behavior towards multiple members of our staff by individuals outside of our organization.”

“Consistent with our commitment to transparency, we will share the results of the investigation publicly when it is complete,” U.S. Soccer said in a statement. “U.S. Soccer condemns violence of any kind and takes such allegations very seriously.”

Berhalter’s contract has expired, and U.S. Soccer said they will “announce who will lead” this month’s camp “in the coming days.”

The USMNT advanced to the Round of 16 in the World Cup before being knocked out by the Netherlands.

 

Read More 

 

United said it had this woman's missing bag. She tracked it to a residential address

Editor’s Note — Sign up for Unlocking the World, CNN Travel’s weekly newsletter. Get news about destinations opening, inspiration for future adventures, plus the latest in aviation, food and drink, where to stay and other travel developments.

(CNN) — Most of us know the travel fear of a bag not appearing on the belt after a flight. Some of us — ever more, thanks to the aviation chaos this year — know the gut punch of it not appearing. But an increasing number of travelers know what it’s like to lose a bag and get it back — not because of airlines’ diligence, but because they knew their bag’s location thanks to a tracking device they’d packed with their clothes.

Valerie Szybala is the latest with a story to tell. The disinformation researcher from Washington D.C. received her lost luggage after nearly six days, during which she tracked it as it went on walkabouts to local malls and McDonald’s while the airline told her that the bag was safely at its distribution center.

In fact, it appeared to be at someone’s home — an apartment complex where Szybala says she found other emptied and discarded suitcases out by the trash.

The story she has to tell of how her bag was lost and found, and how United Airlines dealt with her case, is enough to make you never check a bag again.

Szybala had taken her first international trip in several years — a month abroad — and was flying back to D.C.’s Reagan Airport on December 28. She had bought an Airtag — Apple’s tracking device — especially for the trip.

“I’d heard that it was a thing,” she says of 2022’s travel trend of putting tracking devices in luggage to find bags in the event that they get lost. “I had a layover scheduled, so I knew the potential for the bag to get lost was high.”

What she hadn’t bargained on was the “crazy weather” and “implosion” of Southwest Airlines. Although she was flying United, her layover was via a Southwest hub. So it wasn’t a huge surprise when she arrived in D.C. to be informed by her United app that her bag hadn’t made it. Not that she could see any staff to talk to: “The airport was a madhouse,” she says.

Instead, Szybala trusted the app which said that the airline knew where her bag was and would return it to her the following day.

In fact, the bag did arrive in D.C. the next day, December 29. But it would not be until January 2 when she got her hands on it. She took up United’s offer to have the bag delivered direct to her home, rather than return to the airport to pick it up in person. “That’s where I made a big mistake, letting them hand it to a third party,” she says.

Days of waiting and false reassurance

December 29 came and went, and Szybala didn’t have her bag back. Then December 30, 31, January 1 — still no bag.

“I was trying to contact them every day but the hold time on the phone was incredible, I never made it, and through the chat on the app the wait time was two to four hours,” she says.

“But I did it every day and they were reassuring me that the bag is coming, it’s in our system, it’s safe in our service center, it’ll be delivered tonight. But that was never true.”

In fact, Szybala already knew there was something wrong, because she could see exactly where the bag was, thanks to the Airtag. “As of Friday 30 at 8 p.m. it had gone to rest in an apartment complex a couple of miles away from me,” she says.

Initially she assumed it’d be delivered to her the next day, but instead, she says, “I watched it go to McDonald’s.”

After that? “To a nearby shopping center in the suburbs, twice.”

Even on Tuesday, the day she got the bag back, she watched it visit a mall.

“Every time it would go back to the apartment complex [afterward],” she says.

United representatives were still telling her that the bag was in their distribution center, despite her proof to the contrary. One even told her to “calm down,” according to the screenshot of a chat she posted on Twitter.

Suitcases by the dumpster

So, Szybala decided to simply go to the apartment complex where her Airtag was located. Her first trip on Friday night didn’t turn up her bag — but she says she did find two other suitcases with luggage labels, opened and emptied beside the trash cans. One still had its owner’s details on it. Szybala emailed them to ask if their case was missing but has yet to hear back.

“When I found the empty suitcases out by the dumpsters is when I got worried,” she says. “And United was lying to me so I took it to Twitter.” Her January 1 picture of the suitcases by the dumpsters has been seen over 21 million times. She also called the police when she found the cases by the trash, but says they “weren’t able to help much” since she couldn’t pinpoint the exact apartment it was in.

While Szybala says that United’s Twitter team was suggesting she file a reimbursement claim, she just wanted her bag back. So she kept tweeting, kept logging the location of the bag as it ‘visited’ places including a “European Wax Center” and a McDonald’s, and kept visiting that apartment complex as it returned ‘home’. On her fourth visit, having gone viral by now, she was accompanied by a local TV crew — and everything changed.

“We wandered round the garage again, this time with a local resident who’d seen my Twitter thread,” she told CNN.

“The other bags [by the dumpsters] were gone. The resident who came to help said they’d seen someone taking them inside.”

“We were peeking in trunks trying to find [my case]. Then when I went outside I had a text from a courier saying he had my bag and was just around the corner. He met me in front of the building and brought my bag with him.”

She said that the bag — which still carried her luggage label and extra ID tag — was still locked, with the contents appearing to be intact.

Szybala said that the courier — who was in an unmarked car, not an official van, and wasn’t wearing any kind of uniform — told her that her bag had been misdelivered to the Virginia suburbs, then collected again and delivered to the apartment complex in question.

“But I watched my bag stay in this apartment complex and go on errands since Friday,” she said. “My bag is still locked — it must have been in a vehicle. But I was just too excited to have my bag to ask whether he’d had it all weekend.”

Szybala had recovered her bag only an hour before speaking with CNN, and hadn’t gone through the case fully, but said that “everything looks in order.”

United Airlines told CNN in a statement: “The service our baggage delivery vendor provided does not meet our standards and we are investigating what happened to lead to this service failure.” They didn’t address the behavior of their own staff who repeatedly told Szybala that the suitcase was in United’s distribution center when in fact it was ambling around the D.C. suburbs.

For Szybala, the story isn’t over. “I think United needs to answer for these practices,” she told CNN. “Is it standard practice that people can take passengers’ bags home with them? I feel like they owe me an explanation. I don’t think I’d have got it back if I didn’t have the Airtag, if I didn’t post a viral tweet or get media attention.”

Her advice to travelers? “A tracking device is super helpful if you have any sort of connection. Take a photo of the contents — I wish I’d had a list of things in my bag. And if they say they’ll deliver, don’t accept — just say you’ll pick it up, even if the airport is two hours away.”

She’s not the only one to use a tracking device to confront airlines who’ve lost passengers’ bags. In April, Elliot Sharod prepared a Powerpoint presentation for Aer Lingus after the airline lost a suitcase belonging to Sharod and his new wife, on their return from their South African wedding.
Apple isn’t the only company to make luggage trackers, of course — although CNN’s sister website, Underscored, called Airtags the “ultimate travel companion” last year.
Airtags aren’t without controversy. In December, two women filed a suit against Apple, alleging that their ex partners used the small location devices to stalk them.

source

Rep.-elect George Santos dodged reporters and sat alone in the House chamber on his first day in Congress

Business Insider 

Rep.-elect George Santos, R-N.Y. sits in the chamber during opening day of the 118th Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Tuesday, Jan 3, 2023, in Washington.

Embattled Rep.-elect George Santos arrived for his first day in Congress on Tuesday.
He was photographed sitting alone and yawning while Republicans duked it out over who should become speaker. 
Santos — who lied about his education, religion, and work background — was also seen dodging reporters.

Representative-elect George Santos had an eventful first day in Congress.

After arriving on Capitol Hill, the embattled Long Island Republican repeatedly dodged reporters as he, along with 82 new members of the House of Representatives, waited to be sworn into Congress.

Later in the afternoon, Santos was loudly booed by Democrats when he cast a vote for California Rep. Kevin McCarthy to be House speaker, according to CBS News.

The freshman congressman-elect was also photographed sitting alone in the House chamber and yawning while McCarthy tried and failed, through multiple rounds of voting, to get the 218 votes necessary to secure the speakership.

—Jim Bourg (@jimbourg) January 3, 2023

The New York Times reported that it was the first time in a century that someone didn’t get the votes they needed on the first ballot to become speaker of the House. With each round of voting, McCarthy’s path to the top job in the House becomes less clear, but the California lawmaker expressed confidence that he would win, telling reporters that “we stay in until we win.”

The House of Representatives cannot go about its other business — like swearing in new members — until a speaker is elected. On Tuesday evening, the chamber adjourned for the day and voting will resume at noon on Wednesday.

Santos — the third openly gay Republican member of Congress — initially drew widespread praise from Republicans when he beat Democratic candidate Robert Zimmerman in a closely watched race to represent New York’s 3rd congressional district.

But his statements, both on his resume and on the campaign trail, attracted scrutiny after The New York Times and other media outlets revealed that he misled the public about a plethora of topics including his education, religion, work background, and family history.

He claimed he worked at Goldman Sachs, but a company spokeswoman told The Times they had no record of his employment there.He claimed to have gotten an undergraduate degree in Economics and Finance from Baruch College, but later acknowledged to The Times that he had never graduated.In a previous campaign for Congress, Santos claimed he had attended Horace Mann School, a prestigious preparatory school in the Bronx. But a spokesman for Horace Mann told CNN the school has “no evidence” that Santos went there.He claimed his “grandparents fled Jewish persecution in Ukraine, settled in Belgium, and again fled persecution during WWII.” He also called himself “a proud American Jew,” but later told The New York Post that he “never claimed to be Jewish,” but rather “Jew-ish.”

The congressman-elect is facing several local, state, and federal investigations focusing on whether he violated the law during the course of his two congressional campaigns. Brazilian prosecutors also said Monday that they intend to reopen a 2008 fraud case against Santos and will ask the US Justice Department to formally notify him of the charges.

Santos was swarmed with questions from the press when he got to Capitol Hill Tuesday but stayed mum, sometimes even turning around and walking in the opposite direction to avoid answering questions.

—Scott MacFarlane (@MacFarlaneNews) January 3, 2023—Jackie (@JacquelineKalil) January 3, 2023

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read More 

House adjourns with no Speaker

Just In | The Hill 

The House of Representatives adjourned Tuesday without a Speaker after three ballots for the gavel found no candidate with the majority.

Speaker nominee Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) lost 19 GOP votes on the first two ballots and 20 on the third ballot, leaving the conference in a stalemate on how to proceed.

All 434 members voted for a Speaker candidate, meaning 218 votes were needed to secure the post. With 222 House Republicans to 212 Democrats, McCarthy is well short of reaching that threshold.

Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), a McCarthy ally, made the motion to adjourn, and it was adopted by voice vote. The House will return at noon on Wednesday.

It marks the first time in a century that the House has gone to multiple ballots for Speaker. In 1923, the Speaker election took nine ballots over three days.

The repeated failed votes for McCarthy were expected by much of the conference, particularly after rules change concessions and a heated House GOP meeting on Tuesday morning did not move any of McCarthy’s detractors or those on the fence.

The longtime GOP leader’s opponents coalesced around Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) for the second and third vote, despite the incoming House Judiciary Chairman supporting McCarthy and giving a floor speech nominating him ahead of the second ballot.

McCarthy, who remained stoic on the floor during the long voting process even as it became obvious he would lose, remains adamant he will eventually win the gavel.

“Remember how they all said they have this secret candidate? Their secret candidate nominated me, so where do they go now?” McCarthy said, referring to Jordan. “This can’t be about that, you’re going to leverage somebody for your own personal gain.”

“I’m staying until we win,” McCarthy added. “It will eventually change.”

McCarthy privately huddled with allies including Reps. Steve Scalise (R-La.), Jordan and Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) after the second ballot.

But the third vote saw an uptick in the number of McCarthy detractors, with Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) flipping to support Jordan after he voted McCarthy on the first two ballots. 

“My concern has been, like, look, it’s been two months, bro, you got to close the deal,” Donalds said, referring to the time between the midterm elections and the start of the Congress. “You got two months. And so at this point now is that if you can’t close it, we got to find who can.”

The continued McCarthy opposition has frustrated his supporters and allies who have pledged to not waiver in their support. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) cast her votes for McCarthy as “Only Kevin.”

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) said that the McCarthy antagonists are putting the House GOP “path to suicide and getting [President] Biden reelected in ’24.” He said he has heard talk of Republican members negotiating with Dems to nominate a moderate Republican who would be more open to negotiation.

Whether GOP members can come to any agreement is uncertain.

“We’re going to go have some more conversations tonight and see what’s next,” said Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), who voted for candidates other than McCarthy on all three ballots.

Al Weaver and Aris Folley contributed.

​House Read More 

FTX Collapse: Bankman-Fried To Plead Not Guilty

There will be no big surprise this January 3 in Manhattan federal court. 

Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX will reject DoJ fraud charges against him, a source familiar with the matter told TheStreet.

He will plead not guilty, the source said, confirming a report from The Wall Street Journal. The former trader will be physically present but will not be taking questions, the source added.


source

Colorado sending more migrants to major US cities

Just In | The Hill 

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) plans on sending more migrants to cities like New York, Mayor Eric Adams said Tuesday.  

Adams said that he was notified Monday that Colorado was sending more migrants to major U.S. cities like New York and Chicago.  

“This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,” Adams said during an interview with radio station WABC. “We’ve done our job. There is no more room at the inn.” 

Neither New York City Hall nor a spokesperson for Gov. Polis was able to provide details on when the migrants are set to arrive and just how many will be brought to the Big Apple.  

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) has yet to confirm if the city will receive migrants from Colorado.  

In a statement Tuesday, Gov. Polis said that his administration is working to help transport migrants since about 70 percent do not want to stay in Colorado.  

“In order to facilitate the safe and voluntary transit of people to their desired destinations, the state is working with culturally competent navigators to ensure that each individual is voluntarily making their own travel decision,” the governor said in the statement.  

Polis added in the statement that he recognizes the many migrants stopping in Colorado on their way to their final destination have been slowed down by transportation cancellations stemming from bad weather and workforce shortages.  

Many major U.S. cities including New York City have struggled to provide services to an influx of migrants from the southern border caused in part by the lifting of Title 42 which was scheduled to end on Dec. 21.

Last fall, Mayor Adams came under fire after a tent city on a beach in the Bronx for newly arrived migrants flooded.  

Adams has also been criticized for saying the new wave of asylum seekers was “undermining” New York City’s economy as it still tries to recover from the pandemic.  

Denver has also struggled to help a wave of migrants arriving in the Mile High City.  

The number of migrants and asylum-seekers from the southern border traveling to Denver reached at least 3,500 last month, according to a release from the City and Country of Denver.  

The months-long increase in migrants prompted Denver Mayor Michael Hancock to launch a state of emergency last month later asking the city’s Catholic Archdiocese for help.  

​News, State Watch, Colorado, Gov. Polis, Lori Lightfoot, Michael Hancock, migrants, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, sanctuary cities, Title 42 Read More 

Air marshals outraged at Biden admin for border deployments despite terror threat: 'Absolutely madness'

Federal air marshals are outraged as the Biden administration continues to send them to the southern border despite a renewed terror threat from al Qaeda

Air Marshal National Council Executive Director Sonya Labosco joined “Fox & Friends First” Tuesday to discuss why the diversion has put Americans at risk and why they are going to “suffer” as a result of the move. 

“It looks absolutely insane,” Labosco told co-host Todd Piro. “We don’t understand why these decisions are being made. The intel is clear. Al Qaeda is watching for our weak areas. Our aviation is a high-risk area. We’re not protecting our aviation domain, and we’re going to the border. It is absolutely madness.”

US OFFICIALS MEET WITH TALIBAN IN PERSON FOR FIRST TIME SINCE DRONE STRIKE KILLED AL QAEDA CHIEF IN KABUL 

High-level Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sources told Judicial Review that “al Qaeda says upcoming attacks on US possibly involving planes, will use new techniques and tactics.”

Despite the looming terror threat, the Biden administration announced mandatory deployments to the border as the migrant surge continues to strain already-worsening conditions amid staffing shortages. 

Many agents pushed back on the Biden administration over the move, expressing willingness to refuse the deployment and face possible termination.

Labosco suggested the mandatory diversions may not have sufficient legal grounds.

US TAKES OUT AL QAEDA LEADER AYMAN AL-ZAWAHRI IN ‘SUCCESSFUL’ AFGHANISTAN COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATION 

“We do believe it’s a violation,” Labosco said. “We do believe that DHS has overstepped their bounds. We are waiting for Congress to get sworn in, hopefully today, and we can get some movement here. We need someone to step in, in Congress, and stop the deployment of federal air marshals.”

“This statute, when it was originally a tent and set by Congress, was not to deploy air marshals to the border, and to be clear, there is no national emergency,” she continued. “There’s been no national emergency declared at this point. So we’re still saying that it is we need an injunction from Congress that they cannot send us to the border.”

The Air Marshal National Council sent a letter to DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over the weekend, calling out the administration for the policy since the border crisis has garnered little attention. 

“How can you justify sending FAMs to the border in huge numbers, when the border is in your words secure, and there is no emergency yet?” the letter read. “Yet we have major security incidents happening right now affecting our aviation security.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Even amid the diversion, Labosco noted the American people have not forgotten the critical lessons learned following the devastating 9/11 attacks, more than two decades after thousands lost their lives. 

“I can tell you who hasn’t forgotten, we haven’t forgotten,” Labosco said. “The American people, the family and friends of those that died on 911, they haven’t forgotten.”

“We’re not we’re not going to catch al Qaeda trying to grab an airplane down in El Paso,” she continued. “It’s going to happen right here in a commercial airport, in a commercial aircraft.”

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a DHS spokesperson pushed back on the claim that flights are being left vulnerable.

“Federal Air Marshals have long supported various Departmental operations on a regular basis across Democratic and Republican administrations alike. There is nothing new or unique about this. They have been deployed to support the U.N. General Assembly, Operation Allies Welcome, hurricane recovery efforts, and CBP at the Southwest border. The last Administration in 2019 temporarily deployed some Federal Air Marshals to support CBP at the Southwest border. 

“The suggestion that flights are being left unprotected is completely false. TSA takes its responsibility to secure the skies for the traveling public very seriously. We will continue to protect commercial flights through our multi-layered security processes, including through the Federal Air Marshal Service which supports this critical mission on the ground and onboard aircrafts,” the statement read.

source
Fox News

Fox News>