SpaceX rocket launch kicks off ambitious 2023 in space

Just In | The Hill 

On the heels of a record-breaking year, SpaceX kicked off the new year with its first rocket launch and landing of 2023. If Elon Musk has his way, this would be the first of nearly 100 launches for the rocket company this year, setting the pace for an ambitious year for private space companies. 

A sooty Falcon 9 booster leapt off its launch pad at Space Launch Complex-40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 9:56 a.m. EST on Tuesday, followed up by the rocket’s first stage returning to Earth just eight minutes later. 

The flight, which was the 15th for this particular booster, ferried 114 small satellites into space as part of SpaceX’s 6th dedicated rideshare mission, called Transporter-6. Nearly an hour later, those passengers — a bevy of small satellites and small orbital transfer vehicles that carried satellites for a later deployment into different orbits — began to separate from the rocket’s upper stage. 

The whole process, a complex orbital ballet of satellites shooting into space in perfect sequence, took more than half an hour to complete. The mission is the Hawthorne, Calif.-based company’s sixth dedicated rideshare mission to date, and SpaceX announced during the live broadcast that it plans to launch at least three of these missions this year. The company also plans to offer rideshare opportunities on its Starlink launches, which it says averages one a week. 

Other companies are planning to join in the action. Rocket Lab, which is preparing to open a new U.S.-based launch pad at NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, also caters to smaller satellites — for researchers or companies that might not be able to ride on a traditional flight — and is predicting at least 14 launches for 2023. 

Jeff Bezos’ rocket company, Blue Origin, suffered an inflight anomaly in 2022 which grounded its New Shepard rocket temporarily. However, new Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) filings indicate the company could be on track to return to flight early this year. 

Still, those plans pale in comparison to the 100 launches that Musk boldly claimed SpaceX was aiming for in 2023.

While Musks’ predictions are often wildly optimistic, officials at the U.S. Space Force are preparing for as many as 87 launches from Cape Canaveral this year, according to Lt. Col. Colin Mims, who is the commander of the 1st Range Operations Squadron — the department that provides range safety support for all the launches out of the Florida site. 

According to Mims, 2022 was a banner year for the Space Force and the Eastern Range, which hosted 57-orbital class rockets. This included 48 SpaceX launches and six from United Launch Alliance (ULA), along with two from Astra (both of which failed to reach orbit) and of course, NASA’s massive moon rocket—the SLS. 

2023 aims to keep up and even surpass that pace with more routine flights from SpaceX, including another flight of its heavy-lift rocket, the Falcon Heavy, which is slated to loft a government payload later this month. 2023 will also see the addition of two new launch vehicles that are expected to fly for the first time: ULA’s heavy-lift rocket, Vulcan and Relativity’s Terran 1. 

Blue Origin has been using the suborbital rocket and crew capsule to prepare for its own heavy-lift rocket, the New Glenn. Expected to debut in 2024, New Glenn will be able to compete with both SpaceX and ULA, another American spacecraft launch service provider.  

Blue Origin’s engines, known as the BE-4, are the same engines used in ULA’s new Vulcan rocket. To date, Blue Origin has delivered a pair of flight-ready engines to ULA for the company to use on Vulcan’s inaugural flight later this year. 

On top of its ever-increasing rapid launch cadence, SpaceX also aims to launch its mega rocket, the Starship. The behemoth, which is being developed in Boca Chica, Texas, will be able to launch humans and cargo into deep space. 

The massive rocket already has one flight booked. Japanese billionaire Yusaka Maezawa plans to fly with a crew of people around the moon sometime in 2023, although an actual launch date has not been set yet. Seeing as SpaceX has yet to fly an orbital version of its Starship, that date might be a bit bold. 

However, one thing is certain: SpaceX set an all-time record in 2022 for number of successful launches in a calendar year for a specific type of rocket with its Falcon 9, surpassing the Soviet Soyuz-U launcher, which successfully launched 45 out of 47 missions in 1979. 

2023 promises to be another wild year in space. 

​Technology, Policy, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, SpaceX Read More 

Russian military under fire at home after devastating attack

Just In | The Hill 

A New Year’s Eve strike on a Russian base in the eastern Ukrainian region of Donetsk left dozens of troops dead and sparked fury in Moscow at the officers in charge of the military post.

Russia said the strike killed 63 soldiers, while Ukraine claims up to 400 were killed when rockets fired by U.S.-supplied HIMARS launchers struck an ammunition depot and a nearby barracks.

Still, Moscow’s admission of 63 deaths marks the highest toll from a single attack on Russian troops since the war began. And the carnage has stoked outrage among lawmakers and influential military bloggers as the latest battlefield embarrassment more than 10 months into Russia’s invasion. 

The temporary base was set up at a vocational school building in Makiivka, an industrial city in Donetsk, one of four territories that Russian President Vladimir Putin illegally annexed last year.

Russia’s defense ministry said six rockets were fired from the HIMARS launchers at the military base, only two of which were shot down by anti-air defenses.

Some Russian lawmakers are pushing for an internal investigation into the Makiivka strike and accountability for officers who garrisoned troops into what they said was an unprotected building.

Sergey Mironov, a member of the Russian parliament’s State Duma, said the attack “should be the last of its kind.”

In a Telegram post, he called for an investigation and “personal criminal liability” for any Russian officers or personnel responsible.

“These are not only those who allowed the congestion of military personnel in an unprotected building … but also all the higher authorities who did not provide the proper level of security in the area,” he wrote. “Obviously, neither intelligence, nor counterintelligence, nor air defense did not work properly.”

Grigory Karasin, the chair of the Russian senate’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, said the attack “cannot be forgiven,” vowing vengeance against Kyiv.

“It is clear that a demanding internal analysis of what happened is also needed,” Karasin wrote on Telegram.

Law enforcement personnel with the separatist region of the Donetsk People’s Republic told Russian news agency TASS that the “active use of mobile phones” by Russian soldiers tipped off the location of the Makiivka base to Ukraine, but Ukrainian officials have not publicly discussed that claim.

Russian military bloggers also called the latest attack against Russia on Saturday a disaster, accusing Russian generals of incompetence and the Kremlin of undercounting its losses. 

Alexey Sukonkin, an influential blogger, said “the tragedy in Makiivka is a crime” and those responsible should be “punished.”

“And no, not Ukrainian,” Sukonkin wrote on Telegram. “The Armed Forces of Ukraine are acting as they should — they are trying to kill our soldiers. But their real killer is the scoundrel who positioned the fighters in such a way that it was easy for the enemy to shoot them.”

Eugene Finkel, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, said it was possible that some lower-level commanders could be held accountable in the aftermath of the strike, but the criticism wouldn’t change the calculus from those leading the war effort. 

“It’s just another fail in a long line of failures,” Finkel said.

And while the death toll was particularly high, he doesn’t believe it would provoke more Russian aggression.

“Russia does not need any more reasons to cause damage or kill people,” Finkel said. “This entire talk about potential retaliation is misguided.”

Russia has been launching waves of missile attacks against Ukrainian infrastructure and energy grids since October, while Kyiv has sought to strike back against Russian supply and ammunition depots to curb the assault. 

Last month, alleged Ukrainian drone strikes killed three Russian troops hundreds of miles inside western Russia at an air base where strategic bombers used for missile strikes are reportedly housed.

Ukraine has generally avoided claiming responsibility for the deaths of Russian soldiers from rocket or drone strikes. But after the latest attack, the Ukrainian Center for Strategic Communication and Information Security posted a cryptic Telegram message, writing “Santa packed about 400 corpses” into body bags and “300 more were wounded of varying degrees of severity.”

The General Armed Staff of Ukraine said in a Facebook post on Monday that it carried out 10 attacks on Russian military posts on Dec. 31, and five on anti-aircraft missile systems.

Putin has faced numerous setbacks in the war, including heavy battlefield losses from Ukrainian counteroffensives in Kharkiv and Kherson. And Russia has been unable to take the eastern city of Bakhmut despite months of bloody fighting. 

Last month, Putin acknowledged the war would be a lengthy process and that some troops have deserted. The Russian leader also issued a partial mobilization order over the fall to muster some 300,000 reservists, which led to protests at home.

Igor Girkin, a former Russian paramilitary commander and a prominent blogger, estimated in a Monday post the Makiivka strike killed or wounded hundreds of Russian troops.

Girkin said he was warned the deadly strike could happen again, saying there were other temporary bases that include an “extremely dense” number of personnel and equipment.

“This is not the first such case — last year there were also quite a few of them,” he said. “Our generals are untrainable in principle.”

​Policy, Defense Read More 

DeSantis enters new year in national spotlight

Just In | The Hill 

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is entering 2023 as one of the hottest commodities in Republican politics amid speculation that he’s nearing a campaign for the White House.

DeSantis was sworn in for a second term in the governor’s mansion on Tuesday, seizing on the moment to tout the accomplishments of his first four years in office and lay out some of his priorities for the next four. 

But many Republicans remain skeptical that he’ll stay in Tallahassee for another four years, given his growing stature on the national stage and increasing likelihood that he’ll challenge former President Trump for the GOP’s 2024 presidential nod.

“It’s becoming a lot harder to see a scenario in which he doesn’t run,” one Republican strategist said. “He’s right where anyone that’s considering running for president would want to be. Everyone’s watching him, everyone wants to be around him. No one is running away.”

DeSantis hasn’t yet made a final decision about a presidential bid, according to multiple Republican sources. Even if he eventually launches a campaign, it likely won’t be until after the Florida legislature wraps up its 2023 session in May. 

Nevertheless, DeSantis’s growing clout within the national GOP has become undeniable, even with Trump back on the campaign trail.  

Early polling of the 2024 GOP primary shows him as the only serious threat to Trump’s White House ambitions. He’s emerged as one of the most prolific Republican fundraisers in the country. And he won reelection in November by the widest margin in four decades, dealing a crushing blow to Florida’s status as a swing state.

“He took a state that was considered to be the premier battleground for 20 or 30 years and has, at least temporarily, turned it into a red state,” said Aubrey Jewett, a political science professor at the University of Central Florida.

All that has turned DeSantis into something of a unifying figure for many Republicans at a time of internal conflict and uncertainty for a party still grappling with the fallout of a largely lackluster midterm election year.

“To me, he’s definitely the person that seems to be shaping the Republican Party as it moves away from Trump, and now the only question is when that will happen,” Jewett said.

There are signs that DeSantis has already started to supplant Trump atop the rungs of GOP politics. A USA Today-Suffolk University poll released last month found that by a 2-to-1 margin, Republican voters want a new standard-bearer to pursue Trump’s policies. That same poll found that roughly two-thirds of Republican and Republican-leaning voters want DeSantis to run for president in 2024.

Jewett said that part of DeSantis’s strength among Republicans stems from his ability to frame controversial political positions as a matter of common sense rather than ideology.

“He has a great ability to frame an issue to make it seem like it’s the most reasonable thing in the world. All of the ‘anti-woke’ stuff, he can sell it as a matter of parental rights in education or law and order or protecting free speech. He’s been very effective at putting his own spin on these culture war issues that he’s leaned into.”

Indeed, that strategy was on full display on Tuesday as DeSantis addressed a crowd in Tallahassee after taking his oath of office for the second time. 

He repeatedly cast his opposition to COVID-19-related restrictions as a cut-and-dry effort to preserve basic freedoms, railed against an “unaccountable” federal bureaucracy and insisted that he “will not allow reality, facts and truth to become optional.”

“We will never surrender to the woke mob. Florida is where woke goes to die,” he said, using a phrase that has become a linchpin of his stump speeches.

Yet DeSantis’s inauguration speech was distinct in tone, coming off as more of a national address than a routine outline of his second-term plans. 

He boasted about the rapid growth of the state’s population in the years since the pandemic began and painted himself as a leader unconcerned with ideology, sprinkling in references to former Presidents Lincoln and Reagan along the way.

“We have articulated a vision for a free and prosperous state. We have through persistence and hard work executed on that vision. We have produced favorable results,” DeSantis said. “And now we are here today because the people of Florida have validated our efforts in record fashion.”

DeSantis remains a deeply divisive figure. His willingness to wade into the culture wars has made him a chief villain among Democrats, who see him as a more well-spoken — and potentially more dangerous — iteration of Trump.

And while DeSantis may be starting the New Year in a particularly strong position, politics — especially at the presidential level — can be notoriously fickle. Early on in Trump’s 2016 presidential bid, for instance, few Republicans expected the reality TV star and real estate mogul to eventually win the GOP nomination, let alone the White House.

Another complicating factor for DeSantis is that he’s only just beginning his second term as governor. Some Florida Republicans who support DeSantis say they’re not ready to see him leave the governor’s mansion for a stint in Washington.

Thomas Kennedy, a Democratic National Committee member from Florida, cautioned against betting too heavily on DeSantis’s political future. Kennedy said that, while DeSantis has clear political momentum in his home state and among the GOP’s conservative base, he also carries a significant amount of baggage that could prove damaging on the national stage.

“Our state is uniquely insane, but at the national level, I’m not sure that it plays,” Kennedy said. “You have to pivot or moderate, and I don’t see how DeSantis does that.

“At some point, he’s going to have to try something else. I just don’t think he wins the presidency maligning trans individuals and talking about anti-vax stuff. It’s not a winning strategy.”

​Campaign Read More 

GOP senators worry McCarthy diminished by nasty leadership battle 

Just In | The Hill 

The nasty battle over electing Rep. Kevin McCarthy as the next Speaker is sparking alarm among Senate Republicans who fear the California Republican’s failure to win enough support after multiple votes portends serious problems ahead in the new 118th Congress. 

Senate Republicans voiced their confidence in McCarthy when he met with them in the Capitol shortly before Christmas but his failure to budge a group of hard-line conservatives after making major concessions over the weekend on a rules package has them wondering how he can lead. 

McCarthy’s inability to unify his conference on the first organizing votes of the new Congress is raising doubts about his — or any Republican Speaker’s — ability to pass debt-limit legislation and appropriations bills this year. 

“Don’t they realize how embarrassing this is? Is that possible, that people think about that?” asked Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) incredulously when informed that Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) had nominated Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) for Speaker moments after Jordan himself delivered an impassioned speech to nominate McCarthy for the job. 

“If it’s this hard to elect a Speaker, imagine how hard it’s going to be to pass any legislation,” Cornyn added. 

He noted the one silver lining for Republicans is that Democrats will no longer be able to pass massive spending bills, such as the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, with party-line votes under the budget reconciliation process, as they did when they controlled the House. 

Republican senators were left scratching their head Tuesday afternoon how the group of 19 House GOP conservatives would find a way out of the stalemate after blocking McCarthy. 

“The question is, ‘How do they land the plane?’ and I’m not sure there’s any obvious answer,” Cornyn said. 

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said House Republicans will “eventually” elect a Speaker but acknowledged “it’s not a good start” to the new Congress. 

“At the end of the day, you’re not going to pass a bill out of the House that Biden will sign, I doubt,” Graham predicted. 

“The bottom line is, what’s the end game here?” he asked. 

Graham said he thought McCarthy went too far in trying to appease conservative critics by offering a rules package with several major concessions, including dropping the number of disgruntled Republicans needed to offer a motion to oust the Speaker to five members. 

“I think Kevin’s already given away too much,” Graham said. 

Senate Republican Whip John Thune (S.D.), who served in the House from 1997 to 2003, said he still though there was a path to the Speakership for McCarty, though “it’s definitely a speed bump.” 

“This is the first important step in getting organized so I hope they can get this behind them and we can get a functioning, effective majority in the House because it’s going to be essential and necessary for us to get things done around here. 

“They’re off to a slow start over there but hopefully they’ll figure out a way to come up with a path forward,” he added. 

The disarray in the House GOP conference served as a stark contrast to the Senate, where Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday surpassed late Sen. Mike Mansfield (D-Mont.) as the longest serving Senate leader in history. 

McConnell made no mention of the GOP infighting when he spoke on the floor Tuesday, and instead used his time to pay tribute to Mansfield, whose low-key leadership style of resolving conflicts behind closed doors is one the Kentucky senator has often emulated. 

McCarthy asked Republican senators to trust his ability to manage the House when he met with them on Dec. 21. He did so after Senate Republicans cited concern about McCarthy’s ability to govern a narrow majority in 2023 as a major reason to vote for a year-end $1.7 trillion omnibus package. 

Now those concerns are looking more well-founded, GOP senators and aides said. 

One Republican senator who requested anonymity to comment on McCarthy’s battle with House conservatives said it doesn’t bode well for getting bills passed in 2023 and 2024. 

“This is just further evidence of how difficult in this divided Congress it’s going to be to pass legislation,” said the lawmaker, who added that McCarthy’s challenges exceed those faced by former GOP Speakers John Boehner (Ohio) and Paul Ryan (Wis.). 

“For the House to function, the Speaker has to have authority and this demonstrates the next Speaker, whoever it is, doesn’t have the authority to manage the House,” the source said. 

The biggest challenge looming this year is a vote to raise the nation’s debt limit to avoid a default. That vote is expected to take place in the summer or fall. 

The last time Republicans captured the House majority in the 2010 midterm election, the ensuing stalemate between the Republican-controlled House and the Democratic-controlled Senate and the Obama administration brought the nation within days of a potential default. 

Congress came so close to potential fiscal disaster that Standard and Poor’s downgraded the United States’ credit rating in August of 2011. 

Passing the annual appropriations bills will present another major challenge. 

If elected Speaker, McCarthy will likely have to rely on Democratic votes to pass debt-limit or spending legislation as a number of House Republican conservatives routinely vote against these bills. 

But bringing bills that add to the nation’s debt to the House floor and passing them with Democratic votes is likely to spark new battles with the conservative House Freedom Caucus. 

Graham warned that if the Republican-controlled House can’t pass individual spending bills it will be a “failure.” 

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said his anxiety about potential fiscal disaster in 2023 will depend on whether House conservatives realize they’ll need to give some ground on issues. 

“It depends on whether or not they realize we’re in divided government and that’s going to necessarily move us away from preferred positions to the best we can negotiate,” he said. “Things like funding the government, addressing the debt ceiling are not things you can defer. 

“You either do it or you don’t and we got to do it over the next six to nine months,” he said, referring to the looming must-pass bills.  

​Senate, House, News, Debt limit, House Speakership vote, John Cornyn, Kevin McCarthy, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell Read More 

UBS downgrades Microsoft, cites weakening outlook for Azure and Office

US Top News and Analysis 

There’s some weakness ahead for Microsoft , UBS said. Analyst Karl Keirstead downgraded the tech giant to neutral from buy, saying the latest round of field checks into the business lowered the bank’s confidence in the stock. “We are downgrading our rating on Microsoft shares to a Neutral from a Buy on the back of a weaker round of field checks (see link to report here) on the cloud providers including Azure, a view that Office seat growth is likely to moderate in 2023 and that Microsoft’s multiple already feels fair, not cheap,” Keirstead wrote in a Tuesday note. On Azure, the analyst said the company’s growth engine is entering a “steep growth deceleration” that could be worse in 2023 and 2024 than investors are expecting. What’s more, the analyst worries the slowing could be because of maturation in the business, and not just the tough economic backdrop. Meanwhile, Office 365 — which has been a “remarkably steady machine of late” for Microsoft — could slow revenue growth in 2023, as the seat-based business could be hurt by growing pressure in the labor market, according to the analyst. Shares of Microsoft were down roughly 29% in 2022, snapping a 10-year winning streak. While that was a steep drop, Microsoft nevertheless performed slightly better than the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite, which tumbled about 33%, as well as some other mega-cap tech stocks such as Amazon, which ended last year nearly 50% lower. “This full-year performance and the modest -4% correction since the tough 1Q/Sept print appears a testament to Microsoft’s diversified and relatively sticky enterprise-focused portfolio,” Keirstead wrote. “The ‘easy’ call is that the relative outperformance in 2022 will simply repeat itself in 2023. We are not making a material negative call on the stock, but at 24.5x CY23E FCF, Microsoft shares already embed a ‘defensive premium’ and are a consensus long,” Keirstead added. The analyst’s $250 price target, down from $300, represents upside of just 4% to Tuesday’s closing price for the stock. Shares of Microsoft were down about 2% in Wednesday premarket trading. —CNBC’s Michael Bloom contributed to this report.

Read More 

'I thought I would die on that boat': Mother recalls the horror of month at sea


Aceh, Indonesia
CNN
 — 

Hatemon Nesa weeps as she clings to her 5-year-old daughter, Umme Salima, at a rescue shelter in Indonesia’s Aceh province. Their faces appear gaunt, their eyes sullen, after drifting for weeks at sea on a boat with little food or water.

“My skin was rotting off and my bones were visible,” Nesa said. “I thought I would die on that boat.”

Nesa also cries for her 7-year-old daughter, Umme Habiba, who she says she was forced to leave behind in Bangladesh – she couldn’t afford any more than the $1,000 the traffickers demanded to transport her and her youngest child to Malaysia. “My heart is burning for my daughter,” she said.

Nesa and Umme Salima were among around 200 Rohingya, members of a persecuted Muslim minority, who embarked on the dangerous voyage in late November from Cox’s Bazar, a sprawling refugee camp in Bangladesh crowded with around a million people who fled alleged genocide by the Myanmar military.

But soon after they left, the engine cut out, turning what was supposed to be a 7-day journey into a month-long ordeal at sea, exposed to the elements in the open-topped wooden boat, surviving only on rainwater and just three days’ worth of food.

Nesa said she saw starving men jump overboard in a desperate search for food, but they never returned. And she witnessed a baby die after being fed salt water from the sea.

As the weeks wore on, the passengers’ families and aid agencies pleaded with governments in multiple countries to help them – but their cries were ignored.

Then on December 26, the boat was rescued by Indonesian fishermen and local authorities in Aceh, according to the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR). Of the 200 or so people who boarded the boat, only 174 survived – around 26 died on the boat, or are missing at sea, presumed dead.

Babar Baloch, an Asia spokesperson for the agency, said after a lull during Covid, the numbers of people fleeing are back to pre-Covid levels. Some 2,500 boarded unseaworthy boats last year for the journey, and as many as 400 of them died, making 2022 one of the deadliest years in a decade for Rohingya escaping Cox’s Bazar.

“These are literally death traps that once you get in … you end up losing your life,” he said.

Umme Habiba remains in Cox's Bazar, where she is unable to go to school.

Nesa and Salima’s journey began on November 25 from the overcrowded refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, where she said her children couldn’t go to school, leaving her with little hope for their future.

Nesa said she had carried around two kilograms of rice for the journey, but shortly after the boat left the port, its engine died and they started drifting.

“Starving with no food, we saw a fishing boat nearby and tried to go close,” she said, crying as she recalled the horror. “We jumped in the water to swim close to that boat but in the end, we could not.”

The rickety wooden boat that carried Hatemon Nesa and her daughter, Umme Salima pictured in  Aceh province, Indonesia.

During December, as the boat bobbed aimlessly in the Bay of Bengal, the UNHCR said it was spotted near India and Sri Lanka. But the agency said those countries “continuously ignored” its pleas for intervention.

CNN has contacted the Indian and Sri Lankan Navies for comment but has not received a response. Last month, the Sri Lankan Navy said in a statement that its crews had made a “strenuous effort” to rescue another boat carrying 104 Rohingya, including many women and children, who had fled Bangladesh.

On December 18, Nesa’s brother, Mohammed Rezuwan Khan, who is in Cox’s Bazar, shared with CNN an audio clip of a harrowing phone call he received from one of the refugees aboard Nesa’s boat.

“We are dying here,” the man said via satellite phone, according to the recording. “We haven’t eaten anything for eight to 10 days. We are starving.”

Hatemon Nesa and her 5-year-old daughter Umme Salima at a shelter in Aceh province in Indonesia.

Nesa said the boat’s driver and another crew member jumped into the ocean to find food, but they never returned. “I think they got eaten by fish in the sea,” she said.

Twelve other men entered the water, while holding onto a long rope attached to the boat to try to catch something to eat, but as others on the boat tried to pull them back in, the rope snapped, Nesa said. “They could not return to the boat.”

While all countries are bound by international law to rescue people in distress at sea, swift action is not always forthcoming – particularly where Rohingya refugees are concerned, according to Baloch, from the UNHCR.

“I think everyone will agree as human beings that we have the responsibility you want to save one life in distress, let alone hundreds of people dying,” Baloch said. “(Nearby states) have to act to save these desperate people. It has to be an action which is in coordination done collectively by all the states in the region.”

Nesa and Umme Salima were among the 174 emaciated survivors shown on video setting foot on land for the first time in weeks in late December, some immediately collapsing onto the sand of an Aceh beach, too weak to stand.

They are among the more fortunate ones – the UNHCR believes another 180 are presumed dead, lost at sea on another boat since early December, when the occupants stopped communicating with their families.

The survivors from Nesa’s boat are now receiving medical care in Aceh, however it remains unclear what might happen to them in the coming weeks and months.

Rohingya refugees rest after being transferred to a temporary shelter following their arrival by a boat in Laweung, Aceh province on December 27, 2022.

Indonesia is not party to the UN Refugee Convention and lacks a national refugee protection structure, according to the UNHCR.

For those found to be refugees, UNHCR will begin to look for one of a range of what solutions, including resettlement to a third country or voluntary repatriation, if a person is able to “return in safety and dignity.”

This marks the start of a new chapter for the group of passengers, who have lived for years in overcrowded, unhygienic and unsafe refugee camps in Bangladesh, after fleeing decades of systematic discrimination, widespread brutality and sexual violence in their home country of Myanmar.

“Stateless, persecuted, these Rohingya refugees have known little peace,” said UNHCR’s Baloch.

Much more needs to be done by the international community for the persecuted group, who suffer on a scale most cannot imagine, he added.

For Nesa, the hope remains that she might be reunited with her other daughter some day.

“I was about to die (in Bangladesh),” she said. “Allah gave me a new life … My children should get a proper education. That is all that I wanted.”

source

[Technology] The weird and wonderful gadgets on show at tech expo

BBC News world-us_and_canada 

Image source, Getty Images

Image caption,

Earable Chief Growth Officer Kimi Doan wearing the brainband – which seeks to improve sleep by analysing brainwaves

One of the world’s largest technology shows kicks off in Las Vegas this week, with about 100,000 attendees expected and more than 3,000 exhibitors from around the world showcasing what they hope will be the next big thing.

From the technology giants to the smallest start-ups, all are welcome here, if they can afford to attend. It’s a smorgasbord of clever ideas – and some completely bonkers ones.

But one country is notably absent from CES 2023 – Russia. Last time I was here, in 2020, I took a ride around the city in a driverless car developed by Russian technology giant Yandex. But this year, Gary Shapiro, head of the Consumer Technology Association, which runs the event, says, Russia is “not welcome”.

“We did not welcome them this year given the political situation,” he says. “We just didn’t feel it was appropriate.

“It wasn’t a matter of legal policy for the United States, it’s a matter of our policy as an organisation.”

A few Russian companies asked to exhibit, Mr Shapiro says.

“We said they could relocate to another country if they were interested,” he says.

Mr Shapiro’s view on the Russia-Ukraine conflict is signposted by the Ukraine flag pin badge on his jacket lapel. And he tells me there are about a dozen Ukrainian technology companies here, many showcasing sustainability concepts. One, Releaf, makes paper from fallen leaves.

Image source, BBC News

Image caption,

Zoe shows off a temporary tattoo delivered by an inkjet-printer

The show floor officially opens on Thursday. Within minutes of arriving at a preview event, I’ve:

been given a temporary tattoo by a Prinker – a miniature inkjet-printer company from Koreamunched on a macaron prepared by a “smart” food mixer from US company General Electricwatched an increasingly out-of-breath reporter try to conduct an interview while pedalling furiously on a bike and wearing a virtual-reality headset

Image caption,

Gary Shapiro banned Russia from CES this year

A Rubik’s Cube-sized wood-and-gold gadget I’m told is the “solution” to excess screen time is thrust under my nose. Called Ohm’s Quest, it’s an escape-room-style adventure game that can be played for only 60 minutes at a time.

I try out a voice chatbot from Talkr.ai. “Like ChatGPT [Generative Pre-trained Transformer] but spoken,” I’m told enthusiastically. But when I ask a question into an old-fashioned phone handset placed to my ear, it doesn’t work. Perhaps it’s too loud in the room, the demonstrator says forlornly.

Image caption,

The alternative to screen time?

Fitness and wellbeing figure heavily here, along with smart home devices. Sustainability is also a big feature, which is interesting given technology’s traditionally difficult relationship with the environment and its habit of churning out difficult-to-recycle hardware.

Samsung announced its solar-powered TV remote controls would be made from plastic waste from the sea and recycled aluminium cans.

French company Up & Go has developed a prototype wireless charger for electric vehicles. A small cylinder makes contact with a plate that goes underneath a car fitted with an adaptor. It’s a basic induction process. The company’s Eli Chicheportiche tells me the charger will cost 3,000-5,000 euros (£2,000-£4,000),

“You can do it with a phone, why not a car?” he says.

Image source, BBC News

“I talked with EV users and everybody agrees that the cable system doesn’t work as well we would want it to.”

The current prototype takes several hours but the hope is – with more funding, the goal of many of the companies paying to exhibit – it will eventually be able to complete a charge in 10-30 mins.

CES is not a public event. The room is full of journalists, analysts and other guests. But for many CES veterans, the preview lacks the colour and surprise, the wow factor, of previous years. I am struggling to name a single amazing product – and as the evening wears on, the muttering becomes louder.

“It felt like same old, with no real stand-out tech,” Paolo Pescatore, from PP Insight, says.

Image source, BBC News

Image caption,

These macarons were made using a smart blender

Like many exhibition-style events, CES was hit hard by Covid. Last year, 40,000 people attended. Pre-Covid it was closer to 200,000. But many of this year’s guests and exhibitors are still arriving.

Attending CES always feels a bit like panning for gold – and usually, with the right frame of mind and some comfortable shoes, there is some to be found.

 

Read More 

 

Missouri carries out first known execution of an openly transgender person for 2003 murder



CNN
 — 

Missouri carried out the first known US execution of an openly transgender person Tuesday when Amber McLaughlin, who was convicted of a 2003 murder and unsuccessfully sought clemency from the governor, was put to death by lethal injection.

“McLaughlin was pronounced dead at 6:51 p.m.,” the Missouri Department of Corrections said in a written statement.

“I am sorry for what I did,” wrote McLaughlin in her final statement, which was released by the department of corrections. “I am a loving & caring person.”

McLaughlin’s execution – the first in the US this year – is unusual: Executions of women in the United States are already rare. Prior to McLaughlin’s execution, just 17 had been put to death since 1976, when the US Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty after a brief suspension, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. The non-profit organization confirmed McLaughlin is the first openly transgender person to be executed in the United States.

McLaughlin, 49, and her attorneys had petitioned Republican Gov. Mike Parson for clemency, asking him to commute her death sentence. Aside from the fact a jury could not agree on the death penalty, they say, McLaughlin has shown genuine remorse and has struggled with an intellectual disability, mental health issues and a history of childhood trauma.

But in a statement Tuesday, Parson’s office announced the execution would move forward as planned. The family and loved ones of her victim, Beverly Guenther, “deserve peace,” the statement said.

“The State of Missouri will carry out McLaughlin’s sentence according to the Court’s order,” Parson said, “and deliver justice.”

McLaughlin – listed in court documents as Scott McLaughlin – had not initiated a legal name change or transition and as a death-sentenced person, was kept at Potosi Correctional Center near St. Louis, which housed male inmates, McLaughlin’s federal public defender Larry Komp and the governor’s office have said.

McLaughlin was sentenced to death for Guenther’s November 2003 murder, according to court records.

The two were previously in a relationship, but they had separated by the time of the killing and Guenther had received an order of protection against McLaughlin after she was arrested for burglarizing Guenther’s home.

Several weeks later, while the order was in effect, McLaughlin waited for Guenther outside the victim’s workplace, court records say. McLaughlin repeatedly stabbed and raped Guenther, prosecutors argued at trial, pointing in part to blood spatters in the parking lot and in Guenther’s truck.

A jury convicted McLaughlin of first-degree murder, forcible rape and armed criminal action, court records show.

But when it came to a sentence, the jury was deadlocked.

Most US states with the death penalty require a jury to unanimously vote to recommend or impose the death penalty, but Missouri does not. According to state law, in cases where a jury is unable to agree on the death penalty, the judge decides between life imprisonment without parole or death. McLaughlin’s trial judge imposed the death penalty.

If Parson were to grant clemency, McLaughlin’s attorneys argued, he would not have subverted the will of the jury, since the jury could not agree on a capital sentence.

That, however, was just one of several grounds on which McLaughlin’s attorneys said Parson should grant her clemency, according to the petition submitted to the governor.

In addition to the issue of her deadlocked jury, McLaughlin’s attorneys pointed to her struggles with mental health, as well as a history of childhood trauma. McLaughlin has been “consistently diagnosed with borderline intellectual disability,” and “universally diagnosed with brain damage as well as fetal alcohol syndrome,” the petition said.

McLaughlin was “abandoned” by her mother and placed into the foster care system, and in one placement, had “feces thrust into her face,” according to the petition.

She later suffered more abuse and trauma, including being tased by her adoptive father, the petition said, and battled depression that led to “multiple suicide attempts.”

At trial, McLaughlin’s jury did not hear expert testimony about her mental state at the time of Guenther’s murder, the petition said. That testimony, her attorneys said, could have tipped the scales toward a life sentence by supporting the mitigating factors cited by the defense and rebutting the prosecution’s claim McLaughlin acted with depravity of mind – that her actions were particularly brutal or “wantonly vile” – the only aggravating factor the jury found.

A federal judge in 2016 vacated McLaughlin’s death sentence due to ineffective counsel, court records show, citing her trial attorneys’ failure to present that expert testimony. That ruling, however, was later overturned by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

McLaughlin’s execution “would highlight all the flaws of the justice system and would be a great injustice on a number of levels,” Komp, her attorney, told CNN previously.

“It would continue the systemic failures that existed throughout Amber’s life where no interventions occurred to stop and intercede to protect her as a child and teen,” Komp said. “All that could go wrong did go wrong for her.”

source

Fertilizer could be made much more sustainably

Researchers have shown how nitrogen fertilizer could be produced more sustainably.

This is necessary not only to protect the climate, but also to reduce dependence on imported natural gas and to increase food security.

Intensive agriculture is possible only if the soil is fertilized with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. While phosphorus and potassium can be mined as salts, nitrogen fertilizer has to be produced laboriously from nitrogen in the air and from hydrogen. And, the production of hydrogen is extremely energy-intensive, currently requiring large quantities of natural gas or—as in China—coal.

Besides having a correspondingly large carbon footprint, nitrogen fertilizer production is vulnerable to price shocks on the fossil fuels markets.

Paolo Gabrielli, senior scientist at the Laboratory of Reliability and Risk Engineering at ETH Zurich, has collaborated with Lorenzo Rosa, principal investigator at Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford University, to investigate various carbon-neutral production methods for nitrogen fertilizer.

In their study, the two researchers conclude that a transition in nitrogen production is possible and that such a transition may also increase food security. However, alternative production methods have advantages and disadvantages. Specifically, the two researchers examined three alternatives:

  • Producing the necessary hydrogen using fossil fuels as in the business-as-usual, only instead of emitting the greenhouse gas CO2 into the atmosphere, it is captured in the production plants and permanently stored underground (carbon capture and storage, CSS). This requires not only an infrastructure for capturing, transporting, and storing the CO2 but also correspondingly more energy. Despite this, it is a comparatively efficient production method. However, it does nothing to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
  • Electrifying fertilizer production by using water electrolysis to produce the hydrogen. This requires averagely 25 times as much energy as today’s production method using natural gas, so it would take huge amounts of electricity from carbon-neutral sources. For countries with an abundance of solar or wind energy, this might be an appealing approach. However, given plans to electrify other sectors of the economy in the name of climate action, it might lead to competition for sustainable electricity.
  • Synthesizing the hydrogen for fertilizer production from biomass. Since it requires a lot of arable land and water, ironically this production method competes with food production. But the study’s authors point out that it makes sense if the feedstock is waste biomass—for example, crop residues.

The researchers say that the key to success is likely to be a combination of all these approaches depending on the country and on specific local conditions and available resources.

In any case, it is imperative that agriculture make a more efficient use of nitrogen fertilizers, as Rosa stresses: “Addressing problems like over-fertilization and food waste is also a way to reduce the need for fertilizer.”

In the study, the researchers also sought to identify the countries of the world in which food security is currently particularly at risk owing to their dependence on imports of nitrogen or natural gas. The following countries are particularly vulnerable to price shocks in the natural gas and nitrogen markets: India, Brazil, China, France, Turkey, and Germany.

Decarbonizing fertilizer production would in many cases reduce this vulnerability and increase food security. At the very least, electrification via renewables or the use of biomass would reduce the dependence on natural gas imports. However, the researchers put this point into perspective: all carbon-neutral methods of producing nitrogen fertilizer are more energy intensive than the current method of using fossil fuels. In other words, they are still vulnerable to certain price shocks—not on natural gas markets directly, but perhaps on electricity markets.

Decarbonization is likely to change the line-up of countries that produce nitrogen fertilizer, the scientists point out in their study. As things stand, the largest nitrogen exporting nations are Russia, China, Egypt, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. Except for China, which has to import natural gas, all these countries can draw on their own natural gas reserves. In the future, the countries that are likely to benefit from decarbonization are those that generate a lot of solar and wind power and also have sufficient reserves of land and water, such as Canada and the United States.

“There’s no getting around the fact that we need to make agricultural demand for nitrogen more sustainable in the future, both for meeting climate targets and for food security reasons,” Gabrielli says.

The war in Ukraine is affecting the global food market not only because the country normally exports a lot of grain, but also because the conflict has driven natural gas prices higher. This in turn has caused prices for nitrogen fertilizers to rise. Even so, some fertilizer producers are known to have ceased production, at least temporarily, because the exorbitant cost of gas makes production uneconomical for them.

The research appears in Environmental Research Letters.

Source: ETH Zurich

source