What you need to know about the House Speaker election

Just In | The Hill 

Opposition to House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) for Speaker from a handful of Republican members has the potential to derail his bid and set a marker in history as the first multiple-ballot Speaker election in a century.

No matter what happens, the day is sure to hold surprises and plenty of political drama.

Here is what to know about the process for electing a House Speaker, the math to win nthe election on the floor, what happens if there is no winner and much, much more.

Understanding McCarthy’s math problem

House Republicans’ slim majority heading into the 118th Congress is putting McCarthy in a bind.

The House has 222 incoming Republicans, 212 incoming Democrats and one vacancy left by the death of Rep. Donald McEachin (D-Va.) shortly after his reelection. The special election to fill the vacancy for the solidly Democratic seat is on Feb. 21.

A majority of the whole House is 218 votes, and five or more Republican defections would put McCarthy below that threshold.

McCarthy is in trouble because five House Republicans — Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Bob Good (Va.), Matt Rosendale (Mont.) and Ralph Norman (S.C.) — have explicitly said or strongly indicated they will not support McCarthy. 

Several other House Republicans pushing for rules changes that would empower rank-and-file members have withheld support for McCarthy without explicitly saying they will vote against him. Those members include Reps. Scott Perry (Pa.), Chip Roy (Texas) and Lauren Boebert (Colo.).

When the House GOP conference nominated McCarthy to be Speaker in November, 36 members did not vote for him. Biggs has said he thinks there are around 20 “hard noes” on McCarthy.

All Democrats are expected to vote for incoming House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) for Speaker — at least on the first ballot.

It is possible to elect a Speaker with fewer than 218 votes. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and former Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) were elected with 216 votes in 2021 and 2015, respectively.

Current House practice dictates that the Speaker must be elected by a majority of those voting for a specific Speaker candidate by surname. Vacancies, absences and “present” votes lower that threshold. 

Unexpected absences due to illness, weather or other circumstances, then, could affect McCarthy’s math.

Theoretically, some McCarthy opponents could vote “present” rather than for an alternative candidate in order to express opposition without jeopardizing McCarthy’s path to the gavel.

For instance, if 216 Republicans vote for McCarthy, 212 vote for Jeffries, two Republicans vote for other candidates and four vote “present,” McCarthy would be elected Speaker with a majority of all those voting for a candidate.

But the five most vocal McCarthy opponents have forecasted that they will not vote “present” — keeping McCarthy’s bid in further danger.

The schedule for Jan. 3 and the Speaker’s vote

The House is expected to conduct some housekeeping business for the tail end of the 117th Congress on the morning of Jan. 3 before it officially concludes sine die. 

Then at noon on Jan. 3, the constitutionally designated start of every congressional session, the House will start the 118th Congress.

After a call to order by the House clerk, a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, the clerk will order a quorum call — the first roll call action of the 118th Congress.

The next order of business will be electing the House Speaker. Typically, one leader from each party will give nominating speeches for each party nominee.

Then, the clerk takes a roll call vote, going down the list of every member of Congress who will each vocally cast a vote for Speaker. That process took around an hour for the Speakership election in 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic.

There will be no proxy votes. Not only have Republicans pledged to do away with pandemic-era remote voting rule, that procedure can only be used if the House has not adopted a rules package — which happens after the Speaker election and members take their oaths of office. The 2021 Speaker election didn’t have proxy votes, either.

What happens if no candidate wins a majority?

If no candidate wins a majority of votes for Speaker on the first ballot, House lawmakers will vote again and again until a Speaker is elected.

In the event of multiple ballots, the House will not necessarily continue late into the night. The last time there were multiple ballots, the House adjourned until the following day after four failed ballots. Adjourning also allows members time to negotiate and strike deals.

But the House will be able to do little else. Until a Speaker is elected, it can’t adopt a rules package governing procedure in the House. For House Republicans, uncertainty about the Speaker election has led to a delay in the conference choosing contested committee chairs.

Any long delay in selecting a Speaker could also affect staff operations for the House. Politico reported that guidance sent to House committees warned that payroll cannot be processed for staff if a House rules package is not adopted by Jan. 13.

Dire circumstances could lead to unusual procedures. Twice before, in 1949 and 1956, the House agreed to a resolution that allowed a Speaker to be elected by a plurality. That move was something of a last resort, though, and came after 59 and 129 failed ballots. A majority of the whole House would need to agree to that resolution.

Multiple Speaker ballots would put a marker in history

A Speaker election has not gone to a second ballot in nearly a century and has taken multiple ballots only 14 times, with 13 of those occurring before the Civil War.

The last time, in December 1923, it took nine ballots over three days before the House elected Republican Frederick Gillett (Mass.) to a third term as Speaker. 

Gillett won the Speakership after reaching an agreement with progressive Republicans that the House would consider and debate changes to the House rules — a situation not so different than the one McCarthy is facing today.

The longest Speakership election ever, in 1856, lasted two months and took 133 ballots before Rep. Nathaniel Banks (Mass.) was elected Speaker.

If not McCarthy, then who?

McCarthy allies note there is not a public viable alternative to him for Speaker and argue that his detractors are merely saber rattling to get leverage for concessions on rules and priorities.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) is running as a protest challenger to McCarthy, but not even his fellow McCarthy opponents think he is a viable GOP alternative for Speaker.

McCarthy opponents have teased that there will be an alternative candidate for Speaker revealed at some point, but have declined to come together to name a consensus alternative, fearing backlash.

Rep. Steve Scalise (La.), whom Republicans elected to be House majority leader, is an obvious potential alternative to McCarthy. But Scalise is publicly backing McCarthy.

“Kevin’s going to get there, and he’s going to have a lot of meetings with members to make sure that we get this result on Jan. 3,” Scalise said before the House left for the holidays. 

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who challenged McCarthy to lead House Republicans in 2018, is a favorite of hard-line conservative Republicans. Gaetz has pushed a “Jordan for Speaker” message in recent days. Jordan, though, has also repeatedly said he supports McCarthy.

McCarthy detractors say there is no chance that a Democrat is elected Speaker. And while it is technically possible for a nonmember to be elected House Speaker, Good recently said that notion is “practically improbable.”

Some Republicans and Democrats have also teased the possibility of working together to elect a consensus GOP Speaker. But moderate GOP Rep. Don Bacon (Neb.) says he will only entertain that if McCarthy drops out of the race.

Arguments for and against McCarthy

Supporters of McCarthy argue that he has earned the position after leading House Republicans back to the majority through gains in both the 2020 and 2022 elections. They praise his “Commitment to America” plan for a GOP majority.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), who has emerged as one of the most vocal McCarthy supporters, has also warned that any GOP alternative to McCarthy could be less conservative and give less leeway for hard-line conservatives like herself.

They also criticize any delays in House GOP oversight activities and worry about the precedent of denying their party leader for the past four years the post.

“If you can put all that work and dedicate your life and sacrifice your time, yourself, your family, only in the eleventh hour to have a knife in your back, nobody’s ever going to do that work again. It would set the worst precedent I can imagine politically,” Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) told The Hill in December.

But those opposed to McCarthy or withholding support for him argue that smaller-than-expected gains in the 2022 midterms should not be rewarded. They are pushing McCarthy to take even stronger stances and tactics against Democrats and the Biden administration, want a plan to balance the federal budget and favor rules changes that would empower individual members, among other demands.

Boebert recently said her “red line” for support is restoring any member’s ability to make a “motion to vacate the chair,” a move to force a vote on ousting the Speaker.

McCarthy over the weekend made a key concession on the point and lowered the threshold to five GOP members to make a move to vacate, down from a standard of a majority of the conference. But McCarthy critics have signaled that standard, along with his response on other measures, is not good enough.

​House, News, Andy Biggs, Bob Good, Donald McEachin, John Boehner, Kevin McCarthy, Matt Gaetz, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker's election Read More 

McCarthy reaches moment of truth in Speakership election

Just In | The Hill 

No more posturing, and no more wishful thinking: The House will vote for a Speaker on Tuesday afternoon, revealing whether House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) has the confidence of his conference to lead a new House GOP majority.

It is far from clear how the vote will play out. McCarthy faces vocal opposition from a handful of hardline Republicans threatening to derail his bid despite his bending to their requests, while his allies maintain they will vote for no one other than McCarthy.

If no candidate wins a majority of votes on the first ballot, it will be the first time in a century that the House has gone to multiple votes for Speaker. With 222 Republicans to 212 Democrats, McCarthy can afford to lose just four votes, assuming every member votes for a candidate.

The 118th Congress kicks off at noon. After a prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance and a quorum call, the House will move straight into Speaker nomination speeches and a vote on who will hold the gavel.

McCarthy opponents for weeks have insisted that he does not have the support to be Speaker. While he won the House GOP Speaker nomination with 188 votes, another 31 went to Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) and five voted for other candidates. 

Five House Republicans have strongly indicated they will not vote for McCarthy, and several more have withheld support for him. Biggs has estimated that around 20 Republicans will not vote for McCarthy.

Reasons for opposition are many. They include: disappointment at smaller-than-expected gains in the midterm elections, frustration at a McCarthy-aligned PAC getting involved in GOP primaries, demands for rules changes that would strip power from McCarthy and give more to rank-and-file members, a desire for a more aggressive stance on investigating the Biden administration and impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, and a desire for a budget that significantly cuts federal spending. Opponents have also criticized McCarthy for his previous work with Democrats on spending measures.

At the core, the members withholding support for McCarthy say that those factors, as well as his approach to requests that were first made over the summer, add up to a lack of confidence.

“The problem is that people don’t trust Kevin McCarthy,” Scott Perry (R-Pa), chair of the House Freedom Caucus, told The Hill on Sunday. Perry has not said how he plans to vote on the Speakership as he continues to engage in negotiations.

Members had cautioned McCarthy months ago that the longer he waited to engage with the right flank, the more support he would lose.

“The fact that we are now approaching the 11th hour is not the fault, or is not the responsibility, of his detractors. It’s his responsibility, and the blame lies with him,” Perry said. 

McCarthy allies, meanwhile, have grown frustrated by the opposition that they see as posturing, and worry that some rules change demands could backfire by empowering Democrats.

Some members are planning to wear “O.K.” buttons – for “Only Kevin,” as a response to the “Never Kevin” group – on Jan. 3.

“We are prepared to vote for him for as long as it takes,” Reps. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) and Stephanie Bice (R-Okla.), chair and vice chair of the more pragmatic House GOP Main Street caucus, wrote in a letter on Friday.

“We won’t reward chaos,” the two added, explaining that any support for rules changes that McCarthy opponents are demanding “will be taken off the table if Kevin McCarthy is not expediently elected Speaker of the House on January 3.”

Over the weekend, McCarthy offered some concessions to critics with a House rules package. 

One of those was lowering the threshold for a move to “vacate the chair” — forcing a vote on ousting the Speaker — to just five Republican members, rather than a threshold of at least half of the House GOP Conference that Republicans adopted in an internal rule in November. 

That procedural move made headlines when then-Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), made the motion in 2015, contributing to a House Freedom Caucus rebellion that ended with former GOP Speaker John Boehner (Ohio) resigning from Congress later that year. 

But that’s not good enough for Perry and several of his colleagues, who say that any single member should be able to make the motion. More moderate members argue that reverting to that standard could empower Democrats.

The House is also set to create a House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the “Weaponization of the Federal Government,” an apparent recognition of a request to form a “Church-style” committee to investigate alleged government abuses, in reference to a 1975 Senate select committee named for former Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) that investigated intelligence agencies.

But after a conference-wide call on the House rules on Sunday, a group of nine hardline conservatives led by Perry released a letter saying that McCarthy’s response to their request does not adequately address their requests.

“At this stage, it cannot be a surprise that expressions of vague hopes reflected in far too many of the crucial points still under debate are insufficient,” said the group of nine, which notably is in addition to the five members considered to be in the “Never Kevin” camp.

McCarthy allies also point out that there is no public viable GOP alternative to his candidacy for Speaker. They add that it would be unfair, and set a bad precedent for the Speakership, to reveal an 11th-hour candidate.

Biggs is running as a protest challenger to McCarthy, but not even his fellow McCarthy opponents think he is a viable GOP alternative to McCarthy for Speaker.

“A lot will be revealed on January 3,” Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), who has indicated he will not vote for McCarthy, said before Congress departed in December.

Some McCarthy detractors have suggested that a consensus alternative will emerge once it is clear that the GOP leader cannot win the gavel, but they have not all publicly rallied behind a potential alternative.

Rep. Steve Scalise (La.), who Republicans elected to be House majority leader, is an obvious potential alternative to McCarthy. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) has pushed Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) as a potential alternative. Both Scalise and Jordan, however, say they support McCarthy. 

The turmoil over the Speaker’s race has led to a delay in Republicans organizing their committees and electing chairs in contested races.

“It’s worth a few days or whatever time that it takes to get the best person to lead us, and I’m confident we’ll do that,” Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.), who has said we will not support McCarthy, told The Hill before lawmakers left for the holidays.

The last time the Speaker vote went to multiple ballots was in December 1923, when holdouts pushing for rules changes forced nine ballots over three days before Republican Frederick Gillett (Mass.) won a third term as Speaker. 

Before that, 13 other Speaker elections went to multiple ballots, all before the Civil War. In the longest Speakership election, members cast 133 ballots over two months.

​House, News, Andy Biggs, Bob Good, Jim Jordan, Kevin McCarthy, Speakership election, Steve Scalise Read More 

This week: 118th Congress kicks off with Speaker vote, lawmakers sworn in

Just In | The Hill 

The 118th Congress officially kicks off on Tuesday, with the House voting on its next Speaker and members of both chambers — newly elected and incumbent — taking their oaths of office to be sworn in for the new session.

The House is scheduled to convene at noon on Tuesday and will begin business with the highly-anticipated Speaker vote, which has been a source of contention in the Republican conference for weeks as GOP leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) has sought to shore up support to secure the gavel.

Once a Speaker is sworn in — which could take several days if McCarthy fails to win on the first ballot — members of the House will then be administered the oath of office by the newly minted top lawmaker.

On the Senate side, the chamber will convene at noon on Tuesday for the first session of the 118th Congress, and members will be sworn in.

House to vote on Speaker

The race for Speaker will come to a head on Tuesday, when McCarthy’s nomination hits the floor and lawmakers vote on who to install as the next top lawmaker in the House.

McCarthy won the GOP nomination for Speaker in November, staving off a last-minute challenge by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), a member of the conservative Freedom Caucus. McCarthy secured 188 votes from House Republicans, far ahead of Biggs’s 31. Biggs is remaining in the race as a protest candidate.

McCarthy has been engaging in negotiations with members of the conference for weeks in an effort to to turn his detractors into supporters. On Sunday, he offered a number of concessions to those critics in a rules package released by the conference.

Among the compromises is lowering the required number of Republicans to approve a motion to “vacate the chair,” which would force a vote on ousting the Speaker, to five. In November, the conference voted on an internal rule that would require approval from at least half of House Republicans to force the vote.

Additionally, the House will establish a select subcommittee on the “Weaponization of the Federal Government,” under the umbrella of the Judiciary Committee, which will “investigate the full extent of the Biden Administration’s assault on the constitutional rights of American citizens.”

It remains to be seen, however, how effective those concessions will be in securing enough support for McCarthy’s Speakership bid.

Shortly after House Republicans convened for a call regarding the rules package on Sunday, a group of nine conservatives published a letter describing the changes as “insufficient.”

“At this stage, it cannot be a surprise that expressions of vague hopes reflected in far too many of the crucial points still under debate are insufficient,” the letter reads. “This is especially true with respect to Mr. McCarthy’s candidacy for speaker because the times call for radical departure from the status quo — not a continuation of past, and ongoing, Republican failures.”

The group of nine did not include the five lawmakers who have already expressed opposition to McCarthy, marking an expansion of the contingent of members cool to his candidacy.

Making matters worse for McCarthy, the Club for Growth, an influential conservative group, released a “key vote” alert on Monday urging House members to only vote for a Speaker candidate who agrees to a set of rules changes — terms that McCarthy has not agreed to. On the list is banning the Congressional Leadership Fund, a super PAC aligned with McCarthy, from “engag[ing] in open Republican primaries or against any Republican incumbent.” The statement, however, did not mention McCarthy by name.

Time is running out for McCarthy to strike a deal to secure the gavel. Members will vote for Speaker shortly after the House convenes at noon on Tuesday. 

Adding to the urgency, the chamber cannot move forward with legislative business until a Speaker is elected.

McCarthy needs support from a majority of the chamber voting for a specific candidate for Speaker, making the magic number 218. With the House set to include 222 Republicans and 212 Democrats, that means he can only afford to lose four GOP lawmakers if every member casts a vote.

But if any lawmakers do not vote or vote present, that number could be lower. Democrats are expected to vote for Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.).

The race could go to a second ballot if no candidate secures majority support in the first round of voting. The last time a Speaker was not elected on the first ballot was 1923.

House lawmakers, Senators to be sworn in

After a Speaker is elected, members of the House will begin taking their oaths of office to be sworn in for the 118th Congress. That, however, cannot occur until a Speaker is sworn in, which means it could be days until members take their oaths.

The Speaker will administer the oaths, according to the Congressional Research Service. Both newly elected and re-elected members must be sworn in. More than 70 lawmakers taking the oath are new members of Congress.

Significant attention will be focused on Rep.-elect George Santos (R-N.Y.), who is arriving in Washington amid scrutiny after revelations that he fabricated and misrepresented parts of his biography. He admitted to embellishing parts of his resume after the reports.

The incoming congressman, however, is vowing to serve his term, telling City & State in an interview last week, “I’m not resigning.”

“If I have to leave Congress,” he told the outlet, “it’s going to be by a pink slip by the voters, November of 2024.”

On the other side of the Capitol, the Senate is scheduled to convene at noon, and members of the chamber will be sworn in. Both incumbent senators and those elected for the first time will be administered the oath of office. The oath will be administered by Vice President Harris or a surrogate, per the Senate website.

After senators are sworn in, Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) will be elected president pro-tempore, the position that is third in line to the presidency. Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced in November that he would nominate Murray to the post to succeed Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who is retiring.

The position typically goes to the most senior member of the majority party. That would be Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who has served in the chamber since November 1992, a few months earlier than Murray. Feinstein, however, declined to take on the role.

The Senate is only scheduled to be in session on Tuesday of this week, and will reconvene on Jan. 23.

House Republicans look to plow ahead with first pieces of legislation

Once a Speaker is elected, House Republicans are planning to plow ahead with a number of legislative priorities to kick off the new Congress.

First, the chamber is scheduled to vote on adopting the rules for the 118th Congress, which House Republicans released on Sunday night. The terms have been an area of focus amid negotiations in the Speaker race, with some of McCarthy’s detractors pushing for rules that would empower individual members.

After that, the chamber is set to take up the Family and Small Business Taxpayer Protection Act, which would revoke the increase in funding for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that was appropriated through the Inflation Reduction Act, which Democrats passed over the summer.

McCarthy teased the bill as the first piece of legislation the chamber would take up back in September. Members of the GOP conference have falsely claimed that the increase in funding will authorize 87,000 new IRS agents. The estimate, however, includes support staff and non-agent IRS agents and replacements for individuals who depart the agency over the next 10 years.

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), who is slated to become majority leader in the next Congress, outlined a number of other measures that will come to the floor in the first two weeks of the new session — including eight bills and three resolutions.

Among those listed are bills involving immigration and the border, abortion and how the U.S. manages petroleum and energy production. The chamber will also consider a resolution condemning recent attacks on anti-abortion centers and churches.

“The American people spoke on November 8th and decided it was time for a new direction. The last two years have been tough on hard-working families as they have grappled with drastic increases in the cost of living, safety concerns with violent crime skyrocketing in our communities, soaring gas and home heating prices, and a worsening crisis at our Southern border,” Scalise wrote in a letter to GOP lawmakers last week.

“In the 118th Congress, we will work to address these problems by passing bills that will improve the lives of all Americans,” he added.

​House, News, Senate Read More 

Republicans to watch amid the House Speaker election

Just In | The Hill 

As the House convenes Tuesday to elect a new Speaker, Kevin McCarthy’s path to leadership could be blocked by a number of his fellow Republicans.

A range of GOP stakeholders inside and outside the chamber could play key roles in the lead-up to and during the vote and its aftermath.

If McCarthy cannot secure the support of a majority of those voting on Tuesday, the Speakership election will go to a second ballot. That has not happened in a century. With Republicans holding only 222 seats in the House, McCarthy could only afford to lose four votes and still win the speaker’s gavel if every House member votes.

Here are the Republicans to watch Tuesday as the House chooses its next speaker:

Kevin McCarthy

McCarthy engaged in recent days with members of the Republican caucus to try to gather enough support to become Speaker, but he has not locked that up yet.

He has been trying to work with a group of five members who have directly said or strongly indicated they will not vote for him on Tuesday, along with Republican House members who have made demands of him in exchange for their support.

McCarthy has said some of these requests have his backing, including the creation of a 72-hour requirement between when the final text of a bill is released and when the House votes on it, as well as a proposal for House GOP to block legislation from Senate Republicans who supported the omnibus government funding bill late last month.

He has also agreed to a rule that allows for five House Republicans to make a motion to “vacate the chair,” which would launch a vote to remove the Speaker. House rules have required a majority of a party to support the motion for a vote on removing the Speaker to occur. But some Republicans had pushed for allowing a single member to make the motion.

Biggs, Gaetz, Good, Norman, Rosendale

Republican Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Bob Good (Va.), Ralph Norman (S.C.) and Matt Rosendale (Mont.) have been the most adamant about not supporting McCarthy, and reportedly plan to vote as a bloc on McCarthy’s candidacy.

The five could be enough to deny McCarthy victory, at least on the first ballot, or possibly altogether if McCarthy cannot organize a winning coalition.

McCarthy told conservative radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt in December that he expects they will come around “in the end” but acknowledged they have not moved from their position as their talks have continued.

Biggs challenged McCarthy to be the Republicans’ choice for Speaker in November. McCarthy easily won in a closed-door vote, 188 to 31, but Biggs’ challenge demonstrated McCarthy’s lack of full support, at least at the time.

Gaetz wrote in an op-ed in The Daily Caller last month that McCarthy “has no ideology” and would cave “to liberals.” Norman told The Hill earlier this month that he does not plan to vote for McCarthy but is still meeting with him, adding that “miracles do happen.”

Lauren Boebert

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) has not declared she is absolutely opposed to McCarthy becoming Speaker, but she has drawn a line in the sand for what he must agree to in order to win her support.

Boebert said at a Turning Point USA conference last month that she would not support his bid unless he agrees to the “accountability mechanism” allowing members to make a motion to removing the Speaker.

The rule governing a motion to vacate under Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has required a majority of a party’s caucus members to support its use. Boebert has said that revising the rule is her “red line” for supporting McCarthy and that all negotiations must start with that.

Crane and Ogles

Reps.-elect Eli Crane (R-Ariz.) and Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) will have their first day in Congress on Tuesday and could almost immediately play a key role in determining McCarthy’s fate. The two, along with five other GOP lawmakers separate from the group of five potentially operating as a bloc, signed a letter sent to Republican colleagues in December outlining a list of demands they expect from a future House speaker.

The demands include the ability to force a vote on removing the speaker, declining to raise the debt ceiling without having a plan to cap spending and balance the federal budget in 10 years, and banning House Republican leadership and leadership-affiliated PACs from getting involved in primaries.

The sitting House members who signed the letter are members of the House Freedom Caucus, which is made up of some of the most conservative members of the Republican conference.

Scott Perry and the Freedom Caucus

Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), chair of the House Freedom Caucus and one of the signers of the letter that Crane and Ogles backed, stood by the letter as members of Congress left Washington ahead of the holidays.

“Nothing’s changed. Requests are still there,” he said.

Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.), another signer of the letter, issued a separate statement noting that the letter is not aimed only at McCarthy but anyone wishing to become Speaker.

But caucus members are not united on whether to support McCarthy. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) has been one of McCarthy’s most vocal backers, arguing that an alternative to him could be less supportive of the far-right members of the conference.

Gaetz has called on another Freedom Caucus member, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), to run for Speaker, but Jordan has fully thrown his support behind McCarthy.

Perry was also part of the group that threatened to “thwart” any legislative proposals from Republican senators who voted for the government funding bill.

Steve Scalise

One of the challenges facing McCarthy’s opponents has been the lack of a clear alternative who could be elected Speaker instead. House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) would be an obvious choice.

Scalise, selected as House majority leader for when Republicans retake control of the chamber on Tuesday, has said he supports McCarthy, but he would be among — if not the most — plausible alternative if McCarthy is unable to get the necessary votes to win.

Scalise expressed confidence that McCarthy would prevail, when asked on Dec. 23 about speculation of him being another potential option.

“Kevin’s going to get there, and he’s going to have a lot of meetings with members to make sure that we get this result on January 3,” he said.

But Politico reported on Thursday that some allies of McCarthy have said Scalise could be doing more to help with McCarthy’s Speaker bid.

Donald Trump

McCarthy criticized Trump in the immediate aftermath of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, but the two have returned to being close allies since then.

Trump voiced support for McCarthy becoming the Speaker in an interview with Breitbart in December. He said he warned the group of five GOP House members who are opposing McCarthy that they are “playing a very dangerous game.”

“Look, I think this: Kevin has worked very hard,” Trump said. “I think he deserves the shot. Hopefully, he’s going to be very strong and going to be very good and he’s going to do what everybody wants.”

He pointed to the situation following former House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) resignation in 2015, which led the party to eventually turn to former Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). Trump said Ryan was a “disaster” for the party.

​House, Freedom Caucus, House Republicans, Kevin McCarthy, Speakership vote Read More 

[World] Russia plans to 'exhaust' Ukraine with prolonged attacks – Zelensky

President Volodymyr ZelenskyImage source, Getty Images

Ukraine’s president says Russia is planning a protracted campaign of drone attacks in a bid to demoralise Ukraine.

Volodymyr Zelensky said he had received intelligence reports suggesting that Moscow would launch the attacks using Iranian-made Shahed drones.

It comes after Ukraine carried out a strike that it said killed hundreds of Russian soldiers in the Donbas region.

In an extremely rare admission of battlefield losses, Russia said the attack killed 63 of its troops.

Speaking from Kyiv in his nightly address, Mr Zelensky said Russia planned to “exhaust” Ukraine with a prolonged wave of drone attacks.

“We must ensure – and we will do everything for this – that this goal of terrorists fails like all the others,” he said. “Now is the time when everyone involved in the protection of the sky should be especially attentive.”

Russian drone strikes on Ukraine appear to have increased in recent days, with Moscow launching attacks on cities and power stations across the country over the past three nights.

Mr Zelensky said Ukrainian air defences had already shot down over 80 Iranian-made drones in the opening days of 2023.

Russia has been targeting Ukraine’s energy infrastructure for several months, destroying power stations and plunging millions into darkness during the country’s freezing winter.

Elsewhere, Ukraine has confirmed it carried out a strike in the occupied region of Donetsk, which it earlier claimed killed 400 Russian troops.

Russian officials contested the figure, saying only 63 troops were killed. Neither claim has been verified, and access to the site is restricted.

Footage, apparently from the scene of the attack, was posted by the Ukrainian militaryImage source, Telegram: Horevica / ZSU StratCom
Image caption,

Footage, apparently from the scene of the attack, was posted by the Ukrainian military

The Ukrainian attack on New Year’s Day hit a building in the city of Makiivka, where Russian forces were stationed.

It is extremely rare for Moscow to confirm any battlefield casualties.

But this was such a deadly attack, says the BBC’s Russia editor Steve Rosenberg, that staying silent probably wasn’t an option.

It is the highest number of deaths acknowledged by Moscow in a single incident since the war began 10 months ago.

In a statement on Monday, Russia’s defence ministry said Ukrainian forces fired six rockets using the US-made Himars rocket system at a building housing Russian troops. Two of them were shot down, it added.

Igor Girkin, a pro-Russian commentator, earlier said that hundreds had been killed and wounded, although the exact number was unknown because of the large number still missing.

The building itself was “almost completely destroyed”, he said.

He added that the victims were mainly mobilised troops – that is, recent conscripts, rather than those who chose to fight. He also said ammunition was stored in the same building as the soldiers, making the damage worse.

“Almost all of the military equipment was also destroyed, which stood right next to the building without any disguise whatsoever,” he wrote on Telegram.

Girkin is a well-known military blogger, who led Russian-backed separatists when they occupied of large parts of eastern Ukraine in 2014. He was recently found guilty of murder for his part in the shooting down of flight MH17.

Despite his hawkish stance, he regularly criticises the Russian military leadership and their tactics.

Several Russian lawmakers have also strongly criticised military commanders over the attack, saying commanders must be held to account for allowing troops to concentrate in an unprotected building within range of Ukrainian rockets, where ammunition may also have been stored.

Sergei Mironov – a former chairman of the Russian Senate – said it was obvious than neither intelligence nor air defence had worked properly.

According to the Ukrainian military’s earlier statement, 300 were wounded in addition to the estimated 400 killed. Ukraine’s army claims, almost daily, to have killed dozens, sometimes hundreds, of soldiers in attacks.

A later statement from the Ukrainian military’s general staff said “up to 10 units of enemy military equipment” were “destroyed and damaged” in the strikes, and that “the losses of personnel of the occupiers are being specified”.

Ukraine has not confirmed the strikes were carried out with Himars missiles, maintaining a long-held strategy of not releasing specific details about its attacks.

Makiivka is just to the east of Donetsk city
Image caption,

Makiivka is just to the east of Donetsk city

source

NFL star Damar Hamlin in critical condition after collapsing mid-game

Damar Hamlin #3 of the Buffalo Bills tackles Tee Higgins #85 of the Cincinnati Bengals.
Damar Hamlin #3 of the Buffalo Bills tackles Tee Higgins #85 of the Cincinnati Bengals. (Dylan Buell/Getty Images)

Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin, 24, is in critical condition after collapsing on the field on Monday night during a game against the Cincinnati Bengals. Here’s what we know:

What happened: Moments after getting up from an open field tackle on Bengals wide receiver Tee Higgins, Hamlin fell on his back.

Within 10 seconds, Bills team trainers were treating the player. An ambulance was brought onto the field in under five minutes, footage shows, and Hamlin received CPR, according to an ESPN broadcast. He was then taken to hospital.

Hamlin’s status: The player suffered a cardiac arrest following the hit from the tackle, and his heartbeat was restored on the field, the Bills said in a statement on Twitter early Tuesday.

Hamlin was transferred to the University of Cincinnati Medical Center for further testing and treatment, where he is now sedated, the Bills added.

The game: Play was suspended at 5:58 of the first quarter, then the game was officially postponed. The NFL said more details on next steps would come at an “appropriate time,” adding that Hamlin’s wellbeing was the priority.

The team: Some of Hamlin’s teammates stayed in Cincinnati while the rest of the team travels back to Buffalo Tuesday morning. Buffalo is in New York state, near the US-Canada border.

Bills wide receiver Stefon Diggs arrived at the hospital where Hamlin was being treated late Monday night, ESPN’s broadcast showed.

A bit about Hamlin: The 24-year-old Pennsylvania native joined the Bills in 2021 as a sixth-round draft pick from the University of Pittsburgh. He has played every game this season.

According to his Pittsburgh Panthers player bio, he was redshirted — meaning he sat out games while remaining on the team — in 2016 due to injury. The NFL site added that he also missed time due to injuries in 2017 and 2019.

source

Action sports legend, DC Shoes co-founder Ken Block killed in snowmobile accident

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Action sports legend Ken Block, co-founder of DC Shoes and Hoonigan Racing, died near his home in Utah on Monday at the age of 55 following a snowmobile accident. 

Block’s snowmobile landed on top of him when he rode on a steep slope around 2 p.m.

The news was confirmed on Hoonigan’s social media channels.

Block co-founded DC Shoes in 1984, before selling the skateboard brand in 2004. He then made the conversion from marketing executive to one of the most well-known names in Motorsports.

FORMER NASCAR OWNER ORDERED TO PAY $31 MILLION IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS: REPORT

He was a five-time X Games medalist in RallyCross.

Hoonigan’s YouTube channel became the most popular in Motorsports history, amassing over one billion page views.

F1 DRIVERS PREVENTED FROM MAKING POLITICAL STATEMENTS WITHOUT APPROVAL

Utah’s Wasatch County Sheriff’s Office wrote, “We are saddened to hear of the loss of Kenneth and our hearts are with his family and friends so deeply affected. We thank all of our first responders for their continued service.”

Hoonigan noted of Block; “Ken was a visionary, a pioneer and an icon. And most importantly, a father and a husband. He will be incredibly missed. Please respect the family’s privacy at this time while they grieve.”

 

Read More 

 

[World] Timed Teaser: Who wanted a ‘top table’ seat for Putin?

BBC News world-us_and_canada 

Test your news knowledge against the clock. Can you outscore your friends?

If you cannot see the quiz, follow this link.

Want more of the same? Try our last teaser, take Friday’s quiz of the week’s news or – if you missed it – check out our big quiz of 2022.

Compiled by Andy McFarlane.

What information do we collect from this quiz? Privacy notice.

<img src="” title=”[World] Timed Teaser: Who wanted a ‘top table’ seat for Putin?” /> 

Read More 

 

A double cancer diagnosis like Navratilova's isn't as rare as you might think



CNN
 — 

Tennis superstar Martina Navratilova is starting treatment for stage I throat cancer and breast cancer this month, according to her agent.

American Cancer Society CEO Karen Knudsen, a tennis fan, said she was sorry to hear the news but emphasized, “there’s some silver lining here in terms of the stage of disease that she’s dealing with: both her oral cancer and the breast cancer.”

“The frequency of having what we call multiple primary – so cancers that are truly unrelated from each other in terms of their site of origin – is more frequent than you would think,” said Knudsen, who is not involved in Navratilova’s care.

Meta-analyses looking at thousands of people in several countries have found that about 2% to 17% of people with cancer will have multiple primaries, or multiple kinds of cancers, she said.

Dr. Otis Brawley, an oncology professor at Johns Hopkins University, agreed that it’s not especially rare.

“It is not uncommon for two cancers to be diagnosed in people at the same time. Some cancers grow very, very slowly. And sometimes, people will go to the doctor because they have symptoms for one cancer, and the doctor, being thorough, looks for other things and finds something else,” said Brawley, who also is not involved with Navratilova’s treatment plan.

Navratilova’s agent, Mary Greenham, said the tennis legend discovered an enlarged lymph node in her neck during the WTA Finals in Fort Worth last year. After a biopsy, Navratilova was diagnosed with stage I throat cancer.

While she was undergoing throat tests, a suspicious site was found in Navratilova’s breast, which was also diagnosed as cancer.

Greenham said both cancers were in the early stages, with great outcomes expected.

Navratilova had breast cancer in 2010. About 20% of cancers happen in people who were previously diagnosed with cancer, according to the National Cancer Institute.

Knudsen praised Navratilova for listening to her body and highlighted the importance of cancer screening.

“This is something that she identified based on knowledge of her body and something feeling amiss and taking action. Being an advocate for herself there led to identification at stage I, which is so important,” she said. “Early detection is key to improve outcomes.”

Getting recommended cancer screenings is a good practice for anyone, Knudsen said. She advises talking to your doctor about the right screening plan for you.

“It’s very important to start asking about what that screening plan looks like, because the screening plan is far beyond your age. It’s your age, your risk factors for cancer, your genetic history if you know it but also your family history. So it is the combination of those factors that allow the development of the right screen plan for every individual,” she said.

A localized stage I breast cancer diagnosis has a five-year survival rate of 99%, according to the American Cancer Society.

And although it’s not clear what type of throat cancer the tennis star has, oral and oropharyngeal cancers diagnosed at an early stage have about an 85% five-year survival rate altogether – another reason why it’s important to ensure cancers are caught early, Knudsen said.

Throat cancer can mean a number of things because there are different areas that can become cancerous, according to Brawley.

“Head and neck cancer caused by HPV is an easier cancer to treat compared to a head and neck cancer that’s caused by alcohol and smoking,” he said.

There can also be differences in how these head and neck cancers are treated, according to Knudsen.

A vaccine can help protect against HPV cancers. The recommendation from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is for children to get the vaccine around 11 or 12 years old.

“We do have a highly successful cancer vaccine against HPV-driven cancers. Now, like myself, Martina Navratilova was not of the age that could have benefited from this vaccine. But certainly, the generation behind us has an opportunity to prevent the vast majority of cervical cancers and up to six different head and neck cancers through HPV vaccination,” Knudsen said.

The idea behind giving the vaccine to young people “is to vaccinate at a time when the immune system has the maximum capability to mount a response or resistance to HPV but also prior to the time that someone is likely to have been exposed to HPV,” she said, adding that the recommendation is for people through the age of 26.

Adults between 27 and 45 should talk to their doctor about getting vaccinated.

“If someone is 45 or younger and has not yet been vaccinated, certainly [they should have] a conversation with their physician, and everyone 26 years and younger should consider vaccination. And I can’t emphasize this enough: That’s for men and women,” Knudsen said.

Treating two stage I cancers is different from treating one type of cancer that has spread throughout the body, Brawley said.

Each cancer needs a separate medical team.

“You get your breast surgeons and your breast radiation oncologist and your breast medical oncologist, and they treat the breast cancer, and then you get the head-neck oncologists, including the radiation oncologist and the head-neck medical oncologist, and they treat the head and neck cancer,” he said. “Now, those two groups of people are going to have to talk to each other, and they’re going to have to work to coordinate with each other. But you don’t treat the patient differently other than that coordination.”

The new breast cancer diagnosis doesn’t necessarily mean Navratilova had a recurrence, he said.

Typically, Brawley said, a stage I breast cancer diagnosis means “this is a new cancer only related to her previous breast cancer in that it occurred in the same person.”

Most localized stage I head and neck cancers are treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation, although surgery can be used, Brawley said.

Although breast and head and neck cancers can be deadly if left untreated, Brawley says, it’s good news that both of Navratilova’s cancers are in early stages.

“The fact that they’re both stage I gives her good prognosis from each one,” he said.

Navratilova has highlighted the importance of preventive checkups to combat specific diseases such as breast cancer.

“I think that this is a really important lesson in the importance of cancer screening and early detection and taking action upon yourself,” Knudsen said. “And also recognizing that even someone like an athlete is susceptible to cancer. It’s so important to know your body and develop the screening plan that’s most correct for you.”

source

Russian anger over deadly Ukrainian strike; Zelenskyy says Moscow aims to ‘exhaust’ Ukraine with attacks

US Top News and Analysis 

Russian anger is rising over deadly Ukrainian strikes that killed dozens of Moscow’s soldiers, and some lawmakers are demanding punishment for commanders that they say put troops in danger.

Ukrainians on Tuesday woke to news of more Russian attacks that took place overnight. It was the third consecutive night of strikes since New Year’s Eve, in what Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy called Moscow’s attempt to “exhaust” his country with prolonged offensives.

Ukraine’s armed forces say that they shot the majority of Russia’s Iranian-made Shahed drones out of the sky in the opening days of 2023. Some NATO members look to turn current military spending targets for the group into minimum requirements.

VIDEO2:2402:24
The Russia-Ukraine war is unlikely to end in the foreseeable future: Analyst

NATO to discuss increasing military spending requirements: Stoltenberg

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg speaks during the plenary session of the third day of the 68th Annual Session of the Parliamentary Assembly in the Auditorium Ground Floor Room at the Hotel Melia Castilla, Nov. 21, 2022, in Madrid, Spain.
Alberta Ortego | Europa Press | Getty Images

NATO members plan to discuss military spending requirements in the coming months as some countries call for the current 2% target for each country to become the minimum contribution level, Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg was quoted as saying by German media.

“Some allies are strongly in favour of turning the current 2% target into a minimum,” German outlet DPA reported Stoltenberg as saying in an interview.

“We will meet, we will have ministerial meetings, we will have talks in capitals,” Stoltenberg said, adding that he would lead the negotiations.

The next NATO general meeting will take place on July 11-12 in the Lithuanian capital of Vilnius, by which time Stoltenberg said he aims to reach an agreement.

— Natasha Turak

Russia aims to ‘exhaust’ Ukraine with continued attacks, Zelenskyy says

“The morning is difficult. We are dealing with terrorists. Dozens of missiles, Iranian ‘Shahids’,” Zelenskyy wrote on his Telegram official account, referencing the Iranian-made Shahid drones increasingly used by Russian forces.
Ukrinform | Future Publishing | Getty Images

Russia aims to “exhaust” Ukraine with a prolonged stream of attacks across the country, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in his nightly address.

“We must ensure – and we will do everything for this – that this goal of terrorists fails like all the others,” he said. “Now is the time when everyone involved in the protection of the sky should be especially attentive.”

Russian strikes on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure have ramped up of late, marking three consecutive nights of bombardment in the latest stream of attacks that began on New Year’s Eve. The strikes target Ukraine’s energy facilities in particular, leaving millions of people without heating and power amid the bitter winter cold.

Russian forces are increasingly leaning on deadly Iranian-made Shahed drones, which have wrought havoc on Ukraine’s cities. Zelenskyy said that Ukrainian air defenses shot down more than 80 of such drones in the first days of January.

— Natasha Turak

Russian anger at its commanders over troop deaths from Ukraine attack

Russia made a rare public acknowledgment of human loss after dozens of soldiers were killed in a Ukrainian strike on a temporary barracks in Russian-occupied Donetsk on New Year’s Eve.

Its admission that 63 soldiers were killed — a figure that CNBC has not been able to independently confirm, but that Kyiv officials claim is much higher — signifies one of the most brazen Ukrainian moves in the war to date. It has stoked public anger in Russia, with calls that commanders who allegedly put their troops in danger be punished.

Russian military bloggers said the barracks, situated in the city of Makiivka, were in the same building as a large ammunition storage dump, and that commanders knew it was in the range of Ukraine’s rockets, Reuters reported. The amount of stored ammunition is believed to have caused the high level of destruction.

Russia’s defense ministry said the attack was carried out with four rockets fired by HIMARS launchers, which are made and provided to Ukraine by the U.S. Ukraine has not officially claimed responsibility for the attack, as is typical when the attack is on Russian-controlled land.

Ukraine’s Armed Forces described the Makiivka attack as “a strike on Russian manpower and military equipment.”

— Natasha Turak

Read More