The Hill's Morning Report — Will McCarthy get the votes to become Speaker?

Editor’s note: The Hill’s Morning Report is our daily newsletter that dives deep into Washington’s agenda. To subscribe, click here or fill out the box below.

It’s the moment of truth for Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) as the House votes on Tuesday for a Speaker, revealing whether he has the confidence of his conference to lead a new House GOP majority.

It remains unclear how the vote will play out, The Hill’s Emily Brooks reports, as McCarthy faces vocal opposition from a number of hardline Republicans who have threatened to derail his bid. His allies, meanwhile, remain staunchly loyal to the California lawmaker. 

If no candidate wins a majority of votes on the first ballot of the Speakership election — which is scheduled for noon — it will mark the first time in exactly 100 years that the House has gone to multiple votes for the post. With 222 Republicans to 212 Democrats in the 118th Congress, McCarthy can afford to lose just four votes. But his rivals have insisted he doesn’t have the votes for weeks, and five House Republicans have strongly indicated they will not vote for the California Republican, while several more have withheld their support. 

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), who in December was a challenger to McCarthy for the Speakership nomination, has estimated that around 20 Republicans will not vote for the Republican Leader.

“The problem is that people don’t trust Kevin McCarthy,” Scott Perry (R-Pa.), chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, told The Hill on Sunday. “The fact that we are now approaching the eleventh hour is not the fault, or is not the responsibility, of his detractors. It’s his responsibility, and the blame lies with him.”

Even McCarthy’s Sunday concession to lowering the barriers for rank-and-file members to attempt to depose a sitting Speaker — a change that some GOP lawmakers have warned could weaken their leadership team — might not be enough for him to win the gavel. Right-wing Republicans had been pushing for the rule change, which would allow five members of the House majority to force a vote of no confidence in their leader. But his critics maintain that the measure, which was neutered by Democrats after they took control of the House, should be brought back needing only one member to make the motion as a check on the Speaker’s power, as it did for more than a century (The Hill, The New York Times and Roll Call). 

The conservative Club for Growth released a whip notice for the Speakership vote on Monday, urging a no vote on McCarthy without explicitly naming him. 

Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.), a McCarthy ally, predicted Monday that Republicans will go “however long it takes” to elect a Speaker on Tuesday, but the first vote will likely provide some early indications on how the day will play out (Politico).

“The way the alphabet works, you’ll know on the first ballot pretty quickly,” he said, referring to the alphabetical roll call. “And then we’ll figure out how it grinds out.”

The Hill: What you need to know about the House Speaker election.

A range of GOP stakeholders inside and outside the House could play key roles in the lead-up to and during the vote and its aftermath, writes The Hill’s Jared Gans, who has rounded up the Republicans to watch on Tuesday.

The Hill: Former GOP aide on Speaker vote: “Self-serving” Republicans would make “mockery” of Congress.

The New York Times: Here are the House Republicans to watch if McCarthy’s bid for Speaker falters.


Related Articles

The Washington Post: In her own words: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) steps back after decades in charge.

The New York Times: Brazilian authorities will revive a fraud case against Rep.-elect George Santos (R-N.Y.).

The Washington Post: New liberal Latino lawmakers are preparing to challenge the status quo.

Vox: 23 things we think will happen in 2023.


LEADING THE DAY

POLITICS

After a 2022 that saw Democrats celebrate passing key parts of their agenda and defy expectations in the midterms, the next year is set to bring about change in a newly divided Congress and set the table for the presidential election in 2024. The presidential field will take shape as Republicans mull whether to take on former President Trump and President Biden’s own future takes center stage. The Supreme Court, too, could once again reshape the political arena with major rulings.

The Hill’s Brett Samuels details six storylines to watch that will shape the year ahead.

With three Southern states — Louisiana, Mississippi and Kentucky — gearing up for governors’ contests in 2023, their outcomes could give an early indication of the way the political winds are blowing ahead of the presidential election in 2024. As The Hill’s Caroline Vakil reports, While Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) is term-limited and unable to run again, Govs. Tate Reeves (R) in Mississippi and Andy Beshear (D) in Kentucky are up for reelection.

The race to become the Republican nominee in the 2024 presidential election is quickly becoming a volatile affair, writes The Hill’s Max Greenwood. While Trump alone has formally launched a campaign, most Republicans expect that to change soon. But questions about the future of the party, and Trump’s own legal troubles, are sure to lead to considerations about whether the former president is still the best standard-bearer for the GOP.

Politico: Here are the four big election storylines for 2023.

NBC News: Here are the four major battles facing Congress in 2023.

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol on Sunday released a vast database of its underlying evidence, Politico reports. The panel’s evidence provides the clearest glimpse yet at the well-coordinated effort by some Trump allies to help the former president seize a second term he didn’t win.

Vox: Will 2023 be the year Trump is indicted?

The Hill: Trump’s tax returns raise alarms about the fairness of the U.S. tax code.


ADMINISTRATION

While Biden is entering the new year riding high following a better-than-expected Democratic midterm election performance that has improved his political standing while damaging Trump, he also faces lingering questions over his age and his overall political strength. Most notably, The Hill’s Alex Gangitanto reports, questions remain whether he could defeat Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis if he is the GOP nominee in 2024.

Cristina Antelo, a Democratic strategist who runs Ferox Strategies, told The Hill that Biden’s age remains a concern among Democratic voters. Biden, 80, would finish a second term at the age of 86. DeSantis, meanwhile, is 44, while Trump is 76. 

“It’s crazy to me that Biden is polling so low, even with Dems, considering how much has been accomplished in these first two years,” Antelo said. “But, yes, Dems seem worried that ‘an old white guy’ at the top of the ticket just isn’t going to cut it if the threats to democracy that Trump embodies aren’t on the ballot.”

Politico: Biden begins 2023 with a stronger hand to play and an inclination to play it.

The New York Times: Biden caps two years of action on the economy, with new challenges ahead.

NPR: Biden has made choosing diverse federal judges a priority.


IN FOCUS/SHARP TAKES

INTERNATIONAL

Russia deployed a series of exploding drones around Kyiv on Monday, marking its most recent attack in a bombardment of strikes taken against Ukraine in the new year. Mayor Vitali Klitschko said in a Telegram post that 40 drones were heading for the city overnight, but air defenses destroyed all of them. 

The defenses destroyed 22 drones over the city, three in the region and 15 in other provinces. President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a Saturday address that “no one” will forgive Russia for spreading terror, noting that it attacked Ukraine on New Year’s Eve and other holidays such as Easter and Christmas (The Hill). 

Meanwhile, a Ukrainian attack on a building sheltering Russian soldiers in the occupied Donetsk region killed 63 service members on New Year’s Day, the Russian Defense Ministry said on Monday, which would mark one of the deadliest strikes on Russian forces since the beginning of the war. Ukraine claimed that hundreds of soldiers were killed in the attack, but the figure could not be independently confirmed (The Washington Post).

The New York Times: How Russia’s war on Ukraine is worsening global starvation.

The Washington Post: Europe prepares to take in more Ukrainians, with less support, in 2023.

Israel conducted a missile strike on the international airport in Damascus, Syria on Monday, killing two soldiers and injuring two others, according to the Syrian army. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which tracks human rights abuses in the country and has been described as supporting the Syrian opposition to President Bashar Assad, said four people were killed in the strike, but the conflicting reports could not be immediately reconciled (The Hill).

Vox: In China, Xi Jinping has abandoned “zero COVID.” What happens now?

The New York Times: Russia’s war could make it India’s world.

Reuters: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un sacks No. 2 military official.


OPINION

■ A failed Speaker vote for McCarthy would be a historic event, by Brendan Buck, guest essayist, The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/3Z7YgHC 

■ Will 2023 be a better year for international peace and public health? by Brahma Chellaney, opinion contributor, The Hill. https://bit.ly/3GACSDM


WHERE AND WHEN

🎆 Happy New Year from us at Morning Report! Alexis Simendinger returns to the newsletter tomorrow, Jan. 4.

👉 The Hill: Share a news query tied to an expert journalist’s insights: The Hill launched something new and (we hope) engaging via text with Editor-in-Chief Bob Cusack. Learn more and sign up HERE.

The House will convene at noon for the Speakership election.

The Senate will convene at 11:30 a.m. for a pro forma session, and reconvene at noon to swear in new members.

The president will receive the President’s Daily Brief at 10:15 a.m.

The vice president will preside over the Senate at noon to open the chamber and administer the oath of office to all newly-elected and re-elected Senators. At 1 p.m., she will ceremonially swear in newly-elected and re-elected Senators in the Old Senate Chamber. 

The White House daily press briefing is scheduled at 2:30 p.m.


ELSEWHERE

➤ ECONOMY

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva on Sunday warned that the global economy faces “a tough year, tougher than the year we leave behind.”

“We expect one-third of the world economy to be in recession,” she told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “Why? Because the three big economies — U.S., EU, China — are all slowing down simultaneously.”

The IMF warned in October about the chance of a global recession in 2023, but different economies may be better positioned to weather it. While Georgieva said the U.S. may avoid a recession this year, the European Union, due to the war in Ukraine and subsequent cost-of-living crisis, may not be able to do so (Bloomberg News).

Big banks, however, are painting a different picture and predicting that an economic downturn is fast approaching. According to The Wall Street Journal, more than two-thirds of the economists at 23 large financial institutions that do business directly with the Federal Reserve are betting there will be a U.S. recession this year, while two others are predicting a recession in 2024.

The Hill’s Sylvan Lane breaks down four ways to prepare for an uncertain 2023 economy: Plan for inflation, don’t expect the stock market to roar back, remember that security will be valuable in a recession, and, finally, brace for higher interest rates.

The Wall Street Journal: Stay for pay? Companies offer big raises to retain workers.

PANDEMIC & HEALTH 

The COVID-19 omicron XBB.1.5 variant has nearly doubled in prevalence over the past week and now represents about 41 percent of new cases in the U.S., according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). While data on XBB.1.5 is currently limited, a recent article in the journal Cell by researchers from Columbia University recently found that that sublineages of the BQ and XBB omicron subvariants had a “dramatically increased” ability to evade antibody protection, even among those who had received the bivalent booster dose (The Hill).

The start of the year is a time for many to set workout goals, and motivation for exercise can come in many different forms, The Washington Post reports. Here’s advice from experts on how to make 2023 the year you get moving.

The Atlantic: At-home swabbing still works just fine, but we can’t seem to escape false negatives with rapid tests. What gives?

NBC News: Risk of a dangerous new COVID-19 variant in China is “quite low,” U.S. health expert says.

Information about COVID-19 vaccine and booster shot availability can be found at Vaccines.gov.

Total U.S. coronavirus deaths reported as of this morning, according to Johns Hopkins University (trackers all vary slightly): 1,092,679. Current U.S. COVID-19 deaths are 2,530 for the week, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (The CDC shifted its tally of available data from daily to weekly, now reported on Fridays.)


THE CLOSER

And finally … 🧀 Cheese lovers, rejoice. The creamy, nutty, sometimes even pungent dairy product is among the nation’s favorite — and it’s healthier than most would expect. 

“Cheese is packed with nutrients like protein, calcium and phosphorus, and can serve a healthy purpose in the diet,” Lisa Young, an adjunct professor of nutrition at New York University­, told The Washington Post

Americans’ per capita cheese consumption is 40 pounds a year, or just over 1.5 ounces a day, but fret not: Research shows that even full-fat cheddar — or brie, or mozzarella — won’t raise or reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as Type 2 diabetes or heart disease. Some studies even show that cheese can be preventative. The process of turning milk into cheese changes the way the nutrients and other components in it are chemically arranged, which alters how it’s digested and processed by the body.

This can lead to health effects that are different from those of eating the same nutrients in another form — say cream or butter.


Stay Engaged

We want to hear from you! Email: Alexis Simendinger and Kristina Karisch. Follow us on Twitter (@asimendinger and @kristinakarisch) and suggest this newsletter to friends!



source

DeSantis presidency would be just as 'terrifying' as Trump's, Vanity Fair article laments

Vanity Fair on Monday published a “comprehensive guide” detailing how a hypothetical Ron DeSantis presidency would be as “terrifying” as a Donald Trump one. 

The piece from the left-wing magazine began with a series of reasons DeSantis should not be the next U.S. president, including an endorsement from Twitter CEO Elon Musk, “bigoted policies,” and “authoritarian” behaviors. It was the latest in a string of reports and stories from outlets vehemently opposed to Trump who have declared DeSantis just as bad, if not worse.

“Shouldn’t we be happy about the fact that, at the very least, he doesn’t seem like the type of guy who would Sharpie over a hurricane map to cover his own a– or force people to think about what he gets up to in the bathroom? And the answer is no! We shouldn’t be!,” Bess Levin wrote.

2024 SHOWDOWNS: BIDEN TOPS TRUMP BUT TRAILS DESANTIS IN NATIONAL POLL’S POTENTIAL MATCH UPS

The political correspondent made sure to clarify that her condemnation of DeSantis was not an endorsement of Trump, asserting that the latter would benefit humanity if he were never “heard from or seen again.”

Levin then outlined 13 reasons DeSantis is a bad pick for the top job in Washington, claiming that the Florida governor thinks it is okay to treat humans like “chattel,” that he is “dangerously anti-science” for opposing COVID-19 lockdowns, and that he is “anti-free speech” for signing into law the “Stop WOKE act.”

The piece also suggested that DeSantis is “waging a war” on trans people, sees “no need” for the Respect for Marriage Act, has no interest in preventing gun violence, and is a “massive bully.”

Citing a former college teammate who previously spoke with The New Yorker, Levin added that DeSantis is also an “awful person” and has been for many years. 

RON DESANTIS RECEIVES MULTIPLE STANDING OVATIONS AT FIRST MAJOR GOP 2024 PRESIDENTIAL CATTLE CALL

“Ron is the most selfish person I have ever interacted with. He has always loved embarrassing and humiliating people. I’m speaking for others—he was the biggest dick we knew.” We’ll repeat that for emphasis: “He has always loved embarrassing and humiliating people,” the former college teammate allegedly said. 

A December national poll of Republican primary voters from The Wall Street Journal found that DeSantis would top Trump by double digits in a hypothetical 2024 GOP presidential nomination showdown between the two most popular politicians in the party.

Eighty-six percent of likely GOP primary voters said they held a favorable view of DeSantis, who in November overwhelmingly won re-election to a second term steering the nation’s third most populated state, compared to 74% who viewed Trump favorably.

In a hypothetical DeSantis-Trump face-off for the nomination, the poll suggests the Florida governor ahead of the former president 52%-38%.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

An MSNBC opinion piece last year said DeSantis was more “dangerous” than Trump, and former Florida Rep. David Jolly, now a reliably liberal analyst for MSNBC, also said DeSantis was “far more dangerous.”

source

Michigan cop narrowly dodges shooting ambush, 2 in custody

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

A police officer conducting surveillance escaped injury Monday after a man armed with a rifle fired into an unmarked police car, authorities said.

The Michigan State Police Homicide Task Force and the department’s Special Investigation Section detectives are investigating the shooting, which occurred about 7:35 a.m., when the undercover Dearborn officer was approached by the man with the rifle.

PENNSYLVANIA POLICE CHIEF KILLED IN SHOOTING; SUSPECTED GUNMAN SHOT DEAD IN SHOOTOUT HOURS LATER

“The suspect shot into the unmarked police vehicle and ran,” a Michigan State Police public information officer said on Twitter.

MULTIPLE NYPD OFFICERS STABBED WITH MACHETE NEAR TIMES SQUARE

“The officer was able to leave the scene and was not hurt. Currently, detectives have two suspects in custody and are in the process of interviewing them,” tweets said.

Last September, two Detroit residents were charged after a Michigan state trooper was shot while conducting surveillance with other members of a narcotics unit.

 

Read More 

 

Australia's top health adviser urged government against restrictions on travelers from China



CNN
 — 

Australia’s top medical officer advised the government against imposing any restrictions on travelers coming from China, a day before the health minister announced new testing requirements, internal documents show.

China’s Covid cases are surging after Beijing abandoned its costly zero-Covid strategy, prompting a number of countries to impose restrictions on travelers coming from China and its territories.

Australia was among them, though a letter published on the government website on Tuesday, written by the country’s Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, reveals that the decision was made despite his advice that it wasn’t necessary.

“Based on available information, and in the absence of a specific threat from a variant with increased pathogenicity and immune escape, I do not believe that there is sufficient public health rationale to impose any restriction or additional requirements on travelers from China,” Kelly wrote in the letter dated December 31.

In the letter, Kelly acknowledged widespread concern about the limited information being released by China about its outbreak, “which has highlighted some gaps in global surveillance.”

However, he added that he had consulted with health officers from other parts of the country and New Zealand, and found a “strong consensus” that targeted travel restrictions would be “inconsistent with the current national approach to the management of Covid-19 and disproportionate to the risk.”

Regardless, the following day Australian Health Minister Mark Butler announced that from Thursday, travelers coming from mainland China, Hong Kong and Macao must show proof of a negative Covid test taken within 48 hours of their departure. At the time, he said the new measures were due to the “lack of comprehensive information” about China’s Covid situation and genomic sequencing data.

After criticism that the government was ignoring medical advice, Butler told local radio on Tuesday that it was acting “out of an abundance of caution,” and that the measures were limited to arrivals from China because, until recently, it was the only “significant country” in the world that hadn’t opened up.

Australia is among more than a dozen countries that have imposed restrictions on travelers from China and its territories in the past week. Most, including the US, UK, and other parts of Europe and Asia, are requiring either a pre-departure test or testing on arrival, with arrivals found positive needing to quarantine.

Morocco took the extra step of outright banning all travelers from China, regardless of nationality. The ban goes into effect on Tuesday, with no information on when it will be lifted or whether it applies to people traveling from Hong Kong and Macao, China’s two special administrative regions.

The measures have been controversial, with health experts and scientists around the world warning that these targeted restrictions are largely ineffective at preventing the spread of Covid or new variants – and that they could instead stoke racism and xenophobia.

On Tuesday, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Mao Ning warned that China would take countermeasures against the travel restrictions.

“Some countries have adopted entry restrictions targeting only China, which lack scientific basis, and some excessive practices are even more unacceptable,” she said, adding: “We are firmly opposed to attempts to manipulate epidemic prevention and control measures for political purposes, and will take corresponding countermeasures for different situations in accordance with the principle of reciprocity.”

china covid protest

CNN report: The world’s harshest quarantine is no more

Several experts told CNN there is currently no evidence of a new variant emerging from China, and that even if one were to arise, it would likely spread across the world anyway. Testing requirements don’t catch all cases, especially with variants that have a shorter incubation period.

A country’s best defense was to make sure its own population was well protected through domestic policy, such as widespread vaccinations and basic public health measures, said Karen Grepin, an associate professor at the School of Public Health at the University of Hong Kong.

“In a lot of parts of the world, the pandemic feels like it’s over … but at the end of the day, (these measures) are ultimately what prevents the transmission of the virus,” she said, adding that there’s “no point in worrying about imported cases, if you’re not going to do anything about domestic cases.”

“If countries are at the point where they think those things are no longer important, because for example they’ve developed so much population immunity, then why care about a couple of new cases coming in from China?”

In his letter, Kelly argued that Australia’s domestic situation was strong enough to avoid imposing restrictions, pointing to the country’s “strong surveillance mechanisms” and high immunity levels – due to both vaccination and previous infection.

Instead of travel restrictions, he proposed several alternative measures including an aircraft wastewater testing program and voluntary sampling of incoming travelers on arrival.

source

Spanish police seize hundreds of archaeological artifacts from two homes

Written by Maija Ehlinger, CNNOscar Holland, CNN

Spanish police have recovered hundreds of archaeological artifacts, including marine fossils, Bronze Age ceramics and 18th-century weapons, from two houses in the southeastern province of Alicante.

More than 200 human bone fragments, some of which are between 4,000 and 5,000 years old, were also seized from the homes, the Spanish Civil Guard said in a statement Friday.

The discovery follows a weeks-long investigation, known as Operation Osarium, that led police to what they called “one of the largest illegal private collections” in Alicante. Two men are currently under investigation for the misappropriation of goods with artistic, historical, cultural or scientific value, the statement added.

Roman mosaic tiles, paleolithic flint tools and historical weaponry, including cannonballs and an iron grenade, were among the 350 archaeological artifacts recovered.

Artifacts including marine fossils, Bronze Age ceramics and 18th-century weapons were found.

Artifacts including marine fossils, Bronze Age ceramics and 18th-century weapons were found. Credit: Guardia Civil

After the initial discovery was made at a house in the village of Gata de Gorgos, the homeowner cooperated with police and led them to a larger collection at a property in the nearby city of Dénia.

The occupant at the second home claimed that the archaeological items discovered there had been inherited from a deceased relative, though police found no documentation “that would justify his possession” of the artifacts, the statement added. Investigators did, however, find notebooks containing handwritten notes from the late relative pinpointing where the items originated from.

The discoveries were made from two houses in the province of Alicante.

The discoveries were made from two houses in the province of Alicante. Credit: Guardia Civil

More than 200 human bone fragments were also recovered.

More than 200 human bone fragments were also recovered. Credit: Guardia Civil

The Spanish Civil Guard said it is seeking to collaborate with culture department officials to research and catalog the items.

“The study by specialists could help to date the origin and context of the pieces, thereby increasing their value, and even facilitating the location of new archaeological sites,” the police statement added.

The discovery comes a year after 36 stolen antiquities, also recovered by the Spanish Civil Guard, were returned to Egypt. The objects, which included figurines of goddesses and ancient jars, were seized at the Spanish port of Valencia after being smuggled out of archaeological sites in 2014, according to Reuters.

source

8 in 10 say 2023 will be year of economic difficulty: Gallup

Just In | The Hill 

Eight in 10 U.S. adults believe that 2023 will be a year of economic difficulty with higher taxes and a growing budget deficit, according to a new poll. 

The Gallup poll released Tuesday found that 79 percent of respondents believe the year will be economically difficult, while only 21 percent believe it will be a year of economic prosperity. More than 80 percent expect higher taxes and 65 percent believe prices will rise at a high rate. 

Just more than half said they expect unemployment will rise, but 46 percent said they believe 2023 will be a year of full or rising employment. 

Pollsters found across the board that Democrats were more optimistic about the future than Republicans, which Gallup said is a typical phenomenon based on the party of the sitting president. 

Almost 70 percent of Democrats expect full or rising employment, while only 23 percent of Republicans do. More than half of Democrats expect the stock market to rise and prices to rise at a reasonable rate, but less than 20 percent of Republicans said the same. 

Gallup’s analysis states that Americans are greeting 2023 with skepticism and not much expectation that the economic problems they faced last year will end this year. 

The results of the poll come as high inflation has shown some signs of alleviating but still has a long way to go. The Federal Reserve has aggressively raised interest rates over the months to try to get inflation back to 2 percent. 

The annual inflation rate dropped to 7.1 percent in November but remained near 40-year highs. 

Some economists have expressed concerns about rising interest rates causing an economic slowdown, but the economy has shown some resilience as the number of jobs has continued to increase. 

Still, numerous economic experts have said they expect at least a mild recession in 2023. 

The Gallup poll was conducted from Dec. 5 to 19 among 1,803 U.S. adults. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 points.

​Finance, economic difficulty, economic outlook, gallup poll, inflation, Interest rates, Recession, unemployment Read More 

[World] Kevin McCarthy’s Speaker bid threatened by Republican rebels

BBC News world 

Image source, Getty Images

Republican Kevin McCarthy is struggling to secure enough support to ensure he wins a vote to become the new Speaker of the House of Representatives.

The Californian congressman must win a majority vote in the House on Tuesday to get the role.

But a group of Republicans are refusing to back him, despite him making a number of last-minute concessions.

Mr McCarthy cannot afford to lose more than a handful of votes from his party if he is to win the vote.

The role of Speaker of the House is one of the most important jobs in US politics.

They control the legislative agenda and timetable in the House, as well as who sits on various committees.

Failure to win the speakership on the first attempt could therefore weaken both Mr McCarthy and the Republicans’ credibility, hampering House Republicans’ plans of acting quickly to investigate the Biden administration as well as President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.

How did we get here?

In November’s midterm elections, the Republican Party narrowly secured control of the House of Representatives (the lower chamber of the US Congress) from the Democrats, winning 222 of the 435 seats.

Following the result, the Republican Party’s leader, Mr McCarthy, ran to be the party’s candidate for the new Speaker, and won with 188 votes.

Since then, he has been working to gain the support of Republicans ahead of the opening of the new Congress on Tuesday, when the vote will take place. Thirty five new US senators will also be sworn into the Senate.

If Mr McCarthy wins, he will replace Democrat Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House.

But some right-wing Republicans are refusing to support him, making his bid for the speakership less certain.

The narrowness of the Republicans’ majority in the House means that Mr McCarthy can only afford to lose four of their votes if he is to secure a majority of 218 and secure the position of speaker.

No Democrats are likely to vote for him.

Why are some Republicans refusing to back him?

Those who oppose Mr McCarthy’s bid for the speakership are Trump-supporting hardliners, dubbed the “Never Kevins” by some.

They include representatives Bob Good and Matt Gaetz, who believe Mr McCarthy represents too much of the mainstream and the establishment.

“I won’t be voting for Kevin McCarthy tomorrow. He’s part of the problem. He’s not part of the solution,” Mr Good told Fox News on Monday. “There’s nothing that indicates to me that he’s going to change his pattern since he’s been in leadership, where he’s part of the swamp cartel.”

“I think he’s just a shill of the establishment,” said Mr Gaetz in an interview with the Daily Caller website last week. “I think that Kevin McCarthy is little more than a vessel through which lobbyists and special interests operate.”

Some may also remain wary of his previous stance towards former President Donald Trump following the Capitol riots in 2021, having originally been critical of the then-President, who he said bore responsibility for the attack.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Media caption,

Then and now: Kevin McCarthy on Donald Trump and the Capitol riot

What concessions has Mr McCarthy made?

Despite the opposition, Mr McCarthy said he remained confident he would win Tuesday’s vote. “I think we’re going to have a good day tomorrow,” he told reporters on Monday.

But he has had to make a number of concessions in order to try to win over Republicans who remain opposed to him or who remain on the fence.

One of the key demands Republicans have been asking for would make it easier for a small number of representatives to challenge his role as Speaker – weakening his own position in the House.

Mr McCarthy initially refused to acquiesce to the demand. But with time running out to win opposing Republicans over, he unveiled a package of rule changes on Sunday, including changes to how the Speaker could be removed. The concession means that any five Republican party members can call for the Speaker’s removal at any time.

These, however, did not satisfy some right-wing Republicans he was attempting to win over.

A letter released on Sunday, signed by nine Republicans, said Mr McCarthy’s concessions come “almost impossibly late to address continued deficiencies”.

And on Tuesday morning, one of those rebels, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, confirmed he was a definite no vote. “Kevin McCarthy had an opportunity to be Speaker of the House. He rejected it,” Perry said in a statement.

What happens if no one wins a majority?

No business can be undertaken within the House – not even the swearing in of new members of Congress – until a candidate has been chosen.

So if Mr McCarthy does not win the first vote, members of the House will keep taking part in successive votes until someone wins a majority.

Mr McCarthy has vowed to fight on even if he does not win immediately. And there is no other obvious candidate who could viably challenge for the speakership.

But having to hold more than one vote to decide on the speaker would be embarrassing – not only for Mr McCarthy, but for the Republican party too.

No other candidate running for the speakership for the first time has failed to win in the first vote for 100 years, so such a failure could weaken the Republicans’ credibility within the House.

 

Read More 

Five things to expect from the incoming House

Just In | The Hill 

In our personal lives, a new house usually is exciting. In our political lives, especially this year, a new House of Representatives dominated by MAGA-style conservatives is a cause for national concern.

Here are five things we can expect:

Leadership chaos

The chaos will start today, as the new Republican-controlled House selects a Speaker. It takes leadership to herd political cats into the disciplined force necessary to get things done for the American people.

The incoming House doesn’t have it. With House Republican infighting untamed, current House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) remains short of the votes he needs to become House Speaker.

To get them, he has reportedly floated a concession aimed at the right-wing Freedom Caucus’s demands that five members may call a vote to replace the Speaker. That Sword of Damocles hanging over his head would effectively strip him of authority to do anything other than what the most extremist members want.

And even that appears not to have done the trick, as nine members immediately sent a letter saying they want more before they’ll for him, with some signaling that whatever he concedes won’t be enough.

McCarthy’s top lieutenant, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) has waited quietly in the wings as the likely alternative if McCarthy’s bid fails. Meanwhile, on Dec. 30, Scalise conspicuously reminded his Republican colleagues of his commitment to banning abortion and other right-wing causes in a letter to his Republican colleagues — an implicit knock at McCarthy’s lack of principles.

One can only imagine the cracks in the foundation of trust within the GOP House leadership team.

What we know is that McCarthy, desperate to achieve the position denied to him in 2015 when Republicans passed him by in favor of then-Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), has made clear to his Freedom Caucus opponents that he will do almost anything to get their votes — reinforcing that he has no principles. The concessions are sure to alarm non-radical Republicans, including the 17 GOP members from competitive districts.

The leadership chaos is a harbinger of policy chaos to follow — including the likelihood of rolling government shutdowns and the real threat of default by failing to raise the debt ceiling sometime next summer. In 2013, when Tea Party radicals (egged on by McCarthy) pushed close to the abyss with the threat to default, then-Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) pulled it back. The threat caused a downgrade in the U.S.’s credit rating.

The odds that a McCarthy or Scalise would block the radicals now are slim to none.

Political lies

We’ve witnessed monumental deceit visited upon voters from newly elected Congressman George Santos (R-N.Y.).

But let’s face it. He’s a lag indicator: Trumpism’s central feature has long been a commitment to big lies and little ones, and it has taken over the party. Exhibit A: Trumpist Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) has welcomed Santos with the statement, “Glad George is being honest.”

Another George — this one surnamed Orwell — is rolling over in his grave.

Greene’s tolerance for deceit is not unique. Although some Republicans, including the Republican Jewish Coalition, have condemned Santos, the silence from the GOP House leaders has been deafening.

The Republican contempt for basic ethical integrity is underscored by the new GOP House rules package which reportedly guts the independent Office of Congressional Ethics, ousting Democratic members and eviscerating its staff. 

Kabuki Theatre

We’ll soon be witnessing the 2023 version of Republicans’ 2012-2016 Benghazi saga — political theater designed both to bring down the Democrats’ next presidential candidate and to amplify grievances, including ones built on lies and exaggerations.

Expect hearings that call for prosecuting Anthony Fauci, the retired head of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases; for impeaching Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, and others; and for investigating the Jan. 6 House investigators — the new battle hymn of the Republicans. Attacks on the Pentagon for being too “woke” in rooting out extremists are also rumored. And, of course, Hunter Biden’s laptop, over and over. They are banking on the media treating the faux “hearings” as legitimate oversight.

An ‘undo everything’ Congress

The House majority’s time will accentuate the negative. They’ll devote no time to legislation needed to expand jobs for ordinary Americans, to ensure adequate health care, elder care and child care, or to deal with the climate crisis.

If anything, they’ll work to cut Social Security benefits, Medicare, reproductive rights and the taxes of their wealthy donors. And they will use the threat of shutdowns and default to try to achieve these ends.

Poison pills for democracy

Instead of building on the Jan. 6 Committee to protect democracy from the mob, House Republicans will uplift and laud the violent invaders of the Capitol in 2021 who sought to overturn our democracy — and will try to blame Nancy Pelosi for the riot.

They will treat the charged and convicted attackers as victims and will attack the jail conditions in which arrestees awaiting trial have been held. (Do not expect any mention of D.C. residents arrested for drug possession being held in the same conditions.)

The House majority also will try to restrict voting rights and to block further military aid to Ukraine, aid that both advances democracy in Europe and protects our national security. Ukrainian fighters have weakened the military of our Russian adversary, but a large swath of the House’s MAGA Republicans sound more favorable toward Russia and Putin than they do to Ukraine.

Among those unhappy with a leaderless, nihilist House is — of all people — Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). If House Republicans face a backlash, including from suburban voters appalled at their recklessness and extremism, the effects will be felt in 2024, including in Senate races where the GOP has a clear advantage to regain the majority.

But whether McConnell, now in the crosshairs of Donald Trump and some right-wing talk-show hosts, can curb these excesses is unlikely. So Republicans may face that backlash next year — but the country may have to weather a series of violent storms before then.

Norm Ornstein is an emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

Dennis Aftergut is a former federal prosecutor, currently of counsel to Lawyers Defending American Democracy.

​Campaign, Opinion Read More 

'It's like a constant gamble:' Ukrainian couple await birth of twins in wartime Kyiv



CNN
 — 

Kateryna and her husband Oleg endure what every citizen of Kyiv must – long blackouts, hours without any internet connection and constant apprehension about the next missile barrage.

But as they begin 2023, they are also preparing for the arrival of twin boys. Kateryna, who is 34, is eight months pregnant. CNN agreed to use only first names for her and Oleg as they fear for their privacy.

She’s not getting much rest ahead of the big day. The air-raid sirens blare almost every day, the crump of explosions is all too familiar. Their lives are shaped by the scheduled power cuts, as electricity is shared among the regions to mitigate the impact of Russia’s strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.

“On New Year’s Eve, I tried to take a nap,” she told CNN from her house in the Kyiv suburbs. “But I woke to the sound of explosions, and they went on through the night. The sirens were on for much of the night, until 4:30 a.m.,” she said.

It’s difficult for residents to distinguish between the sound of air defenses in operation and the impact of Russian cruise missiles and drones.

“I don’t mind the blackouts,” Kateryna said, “but we worry about the next wave of Russian missiles. Will it be us? It’s like a constant gamble.”

A nearby district – Vyshhorod – was hit a month ago, and the indiscriminate nature of the strikes means that residential districts are as much at risk as power plants and railway lines. Dozens of heath facilities across Ukraine, including maternity and children’s hospitals, have been struck since the beginning of the conflict.

Kateryna and Oleg sit by the Christmas tree at their home in the Kyiv suburbs.

When the sirens aren’t wailing, Kateryna said, there is another noise that is new to her neighborhood: the chattering of generators as homes and businesses try to compensate for being without electricity for as much as 12 hours a day.

“They are the jingle bells of this Christmas,” she said.

Despite the risk and the imminent arrival of the twins, Kateryna still travels into central Kyiv twice a week to use one of the co-working spaces that have popped up across the Ukrainian capital.

These spaces have become quite professional, with furniture, heat, lighting and reliable internet, provided through Starlink terminals, bought from the company owned by Elon Musk.

Kateryna works in logistics, helping to import large containers into Ukraine. It’s more than just a livelihood. It’s also a way to contribute to the war effort.

A co-working space in Kyiv, where Kateryna goes to work, offers heating and reliable internet access.

Kateryna and Oleg are luckier than most Ukrainians in that they have a small generator at home, but they use it sparingly. There is always the risk of running out of diesel to power it – it uses a liter of fuel every hour and needs to cool down every four hours. They have to choose which appliances to run: it’s lights or laundry, they said.

They fully expect to need it long after the twins are born.

Living in Kyiv during Russia’s war on Ukraine is about being prepared. Kateryna and Oleg have cupboards full of batteries, power banks and flashlights. If the Russian missile campaign against Ukrainian infrastructure continues, as most expect it will, the scheduled power outages may become less predictable, with more emergency cuts.

There is enough food in the stores “but sometimes I have to shop with a flashlight,” Kateryna says. They keep about two months’ worth of food supplies stacked in the house, just in case the situation goes from bad to worse.

Kateryna takes a picture lit by a portable lamp that sticks to the wall.

Like many people from Kyiv, Kateryna and Oleg moved away from the capital to a safer area in western Ukraine when the invasion began last February. But they never wanted to leave the country. And soon they felt the draw of home pulling them back to the city.

“I have a job here; Oleg has a job here and he cannot work remotely. We have many friends here, our home. For me it’s a nightmare to move somewhere else,” Kateryna said.

Kateryna feels they are both involved in the effort to secure Ukraine’s future. In the early months of her pregnancy, she helped Ukrainian volunteer organizations with fundraising for warm clothes and equipment for the Ukrainian army, she said.

“The company my husband works for has a fund and they help the Ukrainian fighters who are on the front line with equipment like drones and pick-up trucks. We helped collect money for such equipment,” she said.

Kateryna stands in front of the fuel supply for their small, diesel-powered generator.

Kateryna's husband has put together  cots for the twin babies they are expecting.

Like many other Ukrainians, they helped a family that had fled the frontlines earlier in the war. The mother had given birth in the midst of Russian shelling of their hometown of Kreminna in eastern Luhansk region. When the family settled in a Kyiv suburb, Oleg and Kateryna helped them out with warm clothes and food.

Kateryna says she is not afraid of becoming a wartime mother. She and Oleg want their sons to grow up in an environment that would be the polar opposite of what life would be under Russian occupation.

“I really want my children to live in a free Ukraine, I want them to be safe. They have the right to safety and protection just like all other children in the world. I don’t want them to live in fear of dying from a Russian rocket, they should be happy and carefree,” she said.

Her one concern – beyond giving birth to healthy children – is that she might find herself lying in the hospital amid another wave of missile attacks. At that point, she will pray very hard, she said.

source

Feehery: Why McCarthy shouldn’t fear the motion to vacate chair

Just In | The Hill 

It was on St. Patrick’s Day in 1910 when George Norris of Nebraska offered a resolution to strip Speaker Joe Cannon, the Czar from Illinois, of some of his dictatorial powers. Norris was a progressive Republican and he chafed at the conservative Cannon’s rule. Cannon not only had the power of recognition on just about every motion but also had complete power to appoint anybody he wanted to whatever committee he wanted and had total control of the Rules Committee. 

Because so many Republican members were out celebrating Ireland’s patron saint, Norris thought he could sneak through a resolution that would weaken Cannon’s iron grip, but the wily and shrewd Illinois congressman wasn’t about to allow the liberal Nebraskan a chance to diminish his power. 

Over the next several days, parliamentary motions filled the air, ending with the first and only time that the House would ever vote to vacate the chair. Cannon would survive the effort to oust him but, in the process of securing his position, he had to compromise with the insurgents and give up some of his power. 

A century later, my former boss, Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) would make a speech about the nature of the speakership, and in it, he would give some advice to future occupants of the office. Chief among them was an admonition to always seek to please a majority of the majority, because if a Speaker could do that, he would stay in power for as long as he (or she) kept the majority. 

The motion to vacate the chair is not used very often because it is an ineffective and silly way to keep a majority in the majority, and it is a waste of time for the minority to call for such a motion, because, well, they are in the minority and they don’t have the votes.

The first time I had even heard of the motion to vacate the chair was when I was working for House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Texas). After a late night of plotting, DeLay had promised a small cohort of rebels — which included future stars of the party like Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Steve Largent (R-Okla.) — that he would support them in their efforts to send Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) a message that his leadership was not working for the bulk of the Republican Conference.

Gingrich put down the rebellion when he realized that he had the votes to stay as Speaker, and they didn’t have a viable alternate. 

I left my staff position in Congress in 2005 and I wasn’t around when Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) faced threats from Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) that he would call for a vote to vacate the chair. I never thought Boehner was in much trouble of losing such a vote because he was popular enough within his conference to survive against any challenger and Democrats certainly weren’t going to support any effort to replace him with a more conservative alternative.

Boehner also was pretty popular with the public at large, and no Republican was in danger of losing his seat to a Democrat because Boehner wielded the Speaker’s gavel.

When Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) became Speaker, she made it more difficult for a small group of members to call for a motion to vacate the chair for two reasons. First, unlike Boehner, she was toxic in swing seats, as witnessed by the fact that Republicans ran against her in several campaign cycles, which is unusual in congressional history. Most Speakers of the House aren’t that well known to most voters. Second, Pelosi had little patience for parliamentary tradition or minority rights, and she was brutal in her consolidation of power.

I understand why Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is nervous about giving members back the right to a motion to vacate the chair but, in my opinion, he doesn’t have that much to worry about. He is not nearly as unpopular or as well-known as either Pelosi or Gingrich, and I don’t think there will be much political utility in running congressional campaigns targeting him specifically. And the motion to vacate the chair is overrated as a parliamentary tactic and won’t be invoked by most sane members unless things really go sideways in 2023.

Feehery is a partner at EFB Advocacy and blogs at thefeeherytheory.com. He served as spokesman to former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), as communications director to former House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and as a speechwriter to former House Minority Leader Bob Michel (R-Ill.).  

​Opinion, Campaign, Columnists, motion to vacate chair, Speakership vote Read More