‘WORSE THAN IT ALREADY IS’: Americans reveal low expectations for Biden in 2023

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Americans in the Lone Star state said they don’t expect to see much out of President Biden in 2023, with several indicating little confidence in his ability to improve the economy.

“I just expect him to be the same as he’s always been and not really do much for our country,” Eleanor, a Dallas resident, told Fox News.

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE

A man from Brownsville, a Texas border town, said he expects “nothing” from Biden in 2023.

“I don’t think he’s a good leader,” he said.

Several people doubted Biden’s ability to turn the economy around. Economists worry that the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes to fight surging inflation could lead to a recession

HARVARD ECONOMIST WARNS US HEADED FOR ‘SIGNIFICANT’ RECESSION

“I hope that we can get the economy better,” Mary, another Dallas resident, told Fox News. “I hope that his team can get it back up to where it used to be.”

“I don’t know that I really see that happening,” she added.

One woman said she expects the state of the nation to decline under the Biden administration’s third year.

“I just think that it’s just gonna be even worse than it already is,” the Houston resident told Fox News. “Inflation is already so bad.”

BIDEN SAYS SCOTUS, GOP DO NOT ‘HAVE A CLUE’ ABOUT THE ’POWER OF AMERICAN WOMEN, BUT THEY’RE ABOUT TO FIND OUT’

But Moe, of Austin, said she hoped Biden would implement policies supporting women after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last summer.

“I would love for women to be treated like human beings and have our bodily autonomy back,” she told Fox News.

To watch more Americans share their expectations of Biden in 2023, click here.

 

Read More 

 

GOP deal emerges late Thursday that could give McCarthy a path to the speakership

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

After 11 votes in three days that went nowhere, signs emerged Thursday night that Kevin McCarthy may finally have a viable path to becoming the next House speaker.

It won’t be easy, automatic or immediate, according to House lawmakers who themselves were processing the information in real time as details of the deal emerged. But a written framework for rules in the 118th Congress was released on Thursday that McCarthy’s allies hope will allow many of the GOP lawmakers who have been voting against McCarthy all week to eventually support him.

Lawmakers said the framework gives members of the House Freedom Caucus (HFC) who have been resisting McCarthy virtually everything they’ve been asking for. That includes a stronger HFC representation on key House committees, guardrails aimed at curbing excessive federal spending, and allowing just a single member of the House to make a motion to replace the speaker, lawmakers familiar with the framework told Fox News.

ANTI-MCCARTHY REPUBLICANS, DEM LEADER JEFFRIES FUNDRAISE OFF STALLED HOUSE SPEAKER VOTE

McCarthy had been resisting that last demand and was hoping to require at least five House members to make a motion to “vacate the chair.”

GOP lawmakers who have so far denied McCarthy the 218 votes he needs to become speaker said it will take time to review the framework. Rep.-elect Ralph Norman of South Carolina told Fox News that “this is round one” and that “we still have a ways to go.”

When asked if lawmakers would be working through the weekend to finalize the deal, he said, “probably, yes.”

HFC Chair Rep.-elect Scott Perry of Pennsylvania tweeted late Thursday that time would be needed to assess what’s before them. “We’re at a Reagan moment – ‘trust but verify,’” he wrote. “The devil is in the details, and we’ll take our time to ensure it’s right, not easy. One way or another, the status quo must go.”

THE VOTE FOR HOUSE SPEAKER

There was another reason it might be a few more days before the deal is finalized – some Republican members can’t be in town Friday or the weekend. For example, Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado had to leave Washington Thursday afternoon for a medical appointment, and others were thought to have conflicts that might keep them away.

With such a slim GOP margin in the new House, Republicans will probably need everyone back before voting on McCarthy, and that makes a vote next week seem likely. Some of McCarthy’s most vocal opponents, such as Reps.-elect Matt Gaetz of Florida and Bob Good of Florida, are never expected to support him.

That fact alone is what will keep McCarthy’s path very narrow – he can only afford to lose four GOP votes, and if he wins the gavel, he will likely do so with the bare minimum 218 votes.

HOUSE SPEAKER VOTE: HERE ARE THE 21 REPUBLICANS WHO AREN’T VOTING FOR MCCARTHY

But after three straight days of repetitive voting that resulted in no majority vote for a new speaker, the prospect of a possible deal on the table heartened other GOP lawmakers. Rep.-elect Dusty Johnson of South Dakota said there was suddenly momentum where there had been none.

“I think there’s slow and steady progress being made,” he told Fox News. “I mean, in general you don’t eat a sandwich in one gulp. Take it one bite at a time. And I don’t know exactly what the next few hours will bring but I think there’s a pretty good possibility, we’re going to take a pretty big chunk out of that sandwich.”

Rep.-elect Patrick McHenry of North Carolina said the progress made over the last day and a half made him think McCarthy now has a path to become outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s replacement.

“We’ve got to bring them on the inside for our functioning Republican majority, which we will, which we will with a Republican Speaker,” he said. “Kevin McCarthy will be that speaker at the end of the day, may not be this day. But it will be soon.”

One critique McCarthy has faced is whether he’s on the verge of giving too much away to the HFC, which easily has the numbers to kill any legislation on the floor this year given their roughly 50 members and the GOP’s slender House majority. But McCarthy rejected the idea that he’ll be a weak speaker under the rules he’s negotiating.

“No,” he told Fox News. “I would only be a weaker speaker if I was afraid of them.”

Fox News’ Jacqui Henrich, Tyler Olson, Brianna McClelland and Chad Pegram contributed to this report, and Fox News Digital’s Brianna Herhily.

 

Read More 

 

Meet the American who invented the TV remote control: self-taught Chicago engineer Eugene Polley

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Eugene Polley is not the most popular man on the planet. But perhaps he should be. 

He left a legacy of leisure that billions of people lean upon each and every day.

Polley, a self-taught mechanical engineer from Chicago, invented the television remote control in 1955. 

He envisioned a future in which we never had to leave the couch or twitch any muscle more than a finger.

MEET THE AMERICAN WHO SAVED THE CHAMPAGNE INDUSTRY: MISSOURI SCIENTIST CHARLES VALENTINE RILEY

Eugene Polley changed our lives for the easier. 

Polley worked for Zenith Electronics for 47 years, climbing his way up from stock boy to groundbreaking inventor. He developed 18 different patents. 

His most consequential innovation, the first wireless TV remote control, was called the Flash-Matic. The few previous control devices were hard-wired to the television.

It looked like a science-fiction ray gun. It operated the boob tube with beams of light. 

Polley’s Flash-Matic replaced the only known remote control TV technology at the time, the 8-year-old child. 

This primitive and often unreliable form of human labor had begrudgingly walked back and forth to change channels on demand for adults and older siblings ever since the advent of television. 

“When kids changed the channel, they usually had to adjust the rabbit ears, too,” joked Zenith senior vice president and company historian John Taylor.

Like millions of Americans over age 50, Taylor logged countless unpaid hours of his youth clicking the dials on the family TV set.

The Flash-Matic offered a “startling new kind of television,” Zenith announced in a press release dated June 13, 1955.

SHERIFF MARK LAMB CALLS OUT ‘ATTACK ON TRADITIONAL VALUES’ IN AMERICA, HAS A FIX FOR THAT

The new product, Zenith stated, “uses a flash beam from a small pistol-shaped gadget to turn the set on or off change channels or cut out the sound of long-winded commercials.”

The Zenith announcement continued, “The magic ray (which is harmless to humans) does all the work. No dangling wires or connected cords are needed.”

The world has never been the same.

“For many people, it’s the most-used object in everyday life,” the inventor, at that point long retired, told Sports Illustrated in 1999. 

“It gets more use than the flush toilet.”

The descendants of his innovation are everywhere today. Most people have several TV remotes at home, with more at the office or the job site — and maybe one in an SUV. 

BARBARA WALTERS LEFT BEHIND MESSAGES SBOUT HER ‘SENSE OF ISOLATION’ AS A CHILD — AND WHAT DROVE HER SUCCESS

Despite the ubiquity of the TV remote, the name of its inventor was almost lost to history.

Elvis Presley is more famous than Eugene Polley simply because he could swivel his hips.

Yet who impacts our lives more each day? Eugene Polley had to fight for his legacy after credit for inventing the TV remote first went to a rival engineer. 

Eugene Joseph Polley was born in Chicago to Anthony and Veronica (Wachowski) on Nov. 29, 1915. 

Both were of Polish descent. Veronica came from a well-off family but married a “black sheep” husband, the inventor’s son, Gene Polley Jr., told Fox News Digital.

Anthony Polley “was a bootlegger” with a colorful history, Gene Jr. said. 

“He ended up running for governor of Illinois.” He even boasted connections at the White House. “My dad got to meet the president when he was a young boy,” Gene Jr. added.

Despite the father’s ambition and connections, the Polley family possessed limited financial means. 

“My father wore hand-me-down clothes,” Polley Jr. said. “Nobody would pitch in to help him with an education.”

The future inventor tried two years of college but dropped out due to a lack of finances. 

MEET THE AMERICAN WHO CREATED THE NATION’S FIRST SPORTS BAR IN ST. LOUIS: WORLD WAR II VETERAN JIMMY PALERMO

He ended up with a job as a stock clerk in 1935 at what was then called Zenith Radio Company. 

Now a division of LG electronics, Zenith was founded in 1921 in Chicago by a team of partners that included World War I U.S. Navy veteran Eugene F. McDonald. 

He was known around the company as the commander.

Polley’s work ethic, organizational skills and natural mechanical ability caught the attention of the commander. 

When the United States entered World War II in the 1940s, Polley was part of the Zenith engineering teams who were working on major weapons programs for Uncle Sam. 

Polley helped develop radar, night vision and proximity fuses, which use radio waves to ignite ordnance at a set distance from its target.

American consumer culture exploded after the war — and Zenith was at the forefront of the rapidly growing television market.

‘DANCING WITH THE STARS’ PRO WITNEY CARSON REVEALS THE SEX OF SECOND BABY WITH HUSBAND CARSON MCALLISTER

Commander McDonald, however, was among those annoyed by the bane of broadcast television: commercial interruptions. He ordered the creation of the remote control so that he had a way to mute the sound during the breaks in programming. The commander, of course, saw the profit potential, too. 

Polley designed a system with a television that contained four photo cells, one in each corner of the console. Users could change both picture and sound by pointing the Flash-Matic at the proper photo cell embedded in the TV. 

“He drove to Commander McDonald’s house and installed it for him,” said Polley Jr. 

“Within a week, the commander said he wanted it in production. It sold like hot cakes — they couldn’t keep up with demand.”

“Commander McDonald loved the concepts proven by Polley’s Flash-Matic,” Zenith states in a company history. But he quickly “directed his engineers to explore other technologies for the next generation.”

Polley’s remote control had its limitations. Most notably, its use of light beams meant ambient light — such as sunlight moving through a home — could disrupt the television. 

Just a year after the Flash-Matic hit the market, Zenith introduced a new product, the Space Command, designed by engineer and prolific inventor Dr. Robert Adler. It was a radical departure in technology, using ultrasound instead of light to control the tube.

The Space Command “was built around aluminum rods that were light in weight and, when struck at one end, emitted distinctive high-frequency sounds … They were very carefully cut to lengths that would generate four slightly different frequencies.”

Different frequencies controlled different functions: on/off, channels and sound.

It was the first “clicker” remote — the click caused when a small hammer struck the end of one of the aluminum rods.

Adler’s Space Command quickly surpassed Polley’s Flash-Matic in sales and popularity.

And Adler soon replaced Polley in the eyes of the industry as the inventor of the TV remote.

The National Inventors Hall of Fame actually calls Adler the inventor of the first “practical” TV remote control. Polley is not in the inventors’ club.

Polley’s pioneering work in remote TV technology was being swept aside.

“Adler had a reputation for taking credit for collaborative work that was done by other engineers at Zenith,” claims Polley Jr. “It just annoyed the hell out of my father,” he added.

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY, DEC. 28, 1958, COLTS BEAT GIANTS FOR NFL TITLE IN ‘GREATEST GAME EVER PLAYED’

The friction was heightened by their different backgrounds.

Polley was a self-taught mechanical engineer with no college credentials who worked his way up from the stock room. 

“I’m reluctant to call him a blue-collar guy,” Taylor, the Zenith historian, said. “But he was a scrappy mechanical engineer, a scrappy Chicago guy.”

Adler was born into an elite family in Austria, studied at the University of Vienna and had a PhD in physics.

“They were two very different guys,” Taylor, who knew both men later in their careers, told Fox News Digital.

The breaking point for Polley came when Adler made an appearance on a late-night national talk show and claimed he was the father of the TV remote, said Polley Jr.

“My father saw that and just erupted,” said the son. 

Polley had retired from Zenith in 1982. His late daughter, Joan Polley, set about to help correct history. 

“She was one of his biggest champions,” said Taylor. “She was the first one who showed up in my office and said, ‘What’s all this about Bob Adler?'”

Changing technology helped in Polley’s favor, too. 

Infrared remote controls started to replace Adler’s ultrasound technology in the 1980s. These new remotes powered TV sets with line-of-sight light instead of sound — as did Polley’s Flash-Matic, though in much more primitive form.

“Today’s controllers are much closer to Polley’s idea than to Adler’s,” the Guardian of London noted in its obituary of Polley in 2012.

The switch to infrared technology came just as remotes were finding their way into every American home. 

About 60% of televisions were operated by remote-control in 1981, according to Taylor.

“By the end of the decade, every TV had remote control,” he said.

The industry recognized both men when Polley and Adler shared an Emmy Award in 1997 for “pioneering development of wireless remote control for consumer television.” 

“It makes me think maybe my life wasn’t wasted. Maybe I did something for humanity — like the guy who invented the flush toilet,” Polley told the Baltimore Sun in November 2000. 

Eugene Polley died of natural causes on May 20, 2012. He was 96 years old. 

He enjoyed a fruitful career at Zenith for 47 years — his entire professional career. 

But he received only $1 for the patent to the Flash-Matic, as employee inventions belonged to the company. 

Commander McDonald gave him a $1,000 bonus in recognition of the technological breakthrough in remote technology.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

He had lived long enough to receive the acclaim due to him for his innovation; he had lived long enough to see a world in which the remote-control technology he pioneered was so ubiquitous we can’t image life without it.

Polley and Adler were the subject of a glowing tribute in Sports Illustrated in 1999, which honored them as the magazine’s “Men of the Millennium.”

Author Steve Rushin made a special effort to single out Polley for his achievement. 

“Yes, society has circled back to Polley’s original concept,” Rushin wrote, noting the technological return to light-powered remote control.

“This flippin’ genius now has a glorious 75-button remote in his home. An emperor in his easy chair, Polley … sometimes wears one of those novelty caps sold at truck stops. The cap’s foam crown declares him, now and forever, King of the Remote Control.”

To read more stories in this unique “Meet the American Who…” series from Fox News Digital, click here

 

Read More 

 

‘The Old Way’ star Nicolas Cage on first Western flick, how he would fare on the wild frontier

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Nicolas Cage is known for a host of iconic roles on the silver screen, but there’s one direction he’s yet to face after decades in the industry: heading out into the wild, wild west.

In his latest flick, Cage admitted he had no trouble tapping into his Western roots to play the “cold-blooded gunslinger turned respectable family man” Colton Briggs in “The Old Way.”

“The Western genre is something I’ve always admired,” Cage exclusively told Fox News Digital. “I grew up watching my favorite Western performance, Charles Bronson as Harmonica in “Once Upon a Time in the West.”

“I grew up in California, used to watch these movies on my little TV, and I live in Nevada. I always felt like I would be a good match for a Western. They wouldn’t be that much acting for me. I felt like I could fill those boots and wear that hat.”

‘NATIONAL TREASURE 3’ WITH NICOLAS CAGE GETS MAJOR UPDATE FROM PRODUCER JERRY BRUCKHEIMER

The “Moonstruck” star said he had “Bronson in the back of my mind” throughout filming the outlaw drama which focuses on a Briggs avenging the death of his wife with an unlikely partner, his 12-year-old daughter. Cage, 58, also recalled a few of his favorite roles through the years as he pondered being able to survive in the wilderness like his character.

“When the script came to me for the first time, a traditional Western script, I thought, ‘Well, yeah, I’m going to do that,'” he said. “‘You’re going to pay me to put on … and dress the way I like to dress, and wear the cowboy hat and homage some of my favorite movie stars of all time and yell? I’m there.” 

He added, “My stomach rumbles like anybody else’s. So it was absolutely I was in ’cause I’m not getting any younger, and I didn’t know if I’d be invited again, so I had to do it.”

NICOLAS CAGE HAD TO BE CONVINCED TO TAKE ON ROLE AS HIMSELF IN ‘THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT’

Cage stars alongside Ryan Kiera Armstrong, who plays his daughter Brooke, Shiloh Fernandez, and Clint Howard in the action-packed film from Brett Donowho, which was filmed in Montana in October 2021. At the time, the movie made headlines after “Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was reportedly involved in an incident that led to Cage walking off set. 

When asked by Fox News Digital if he thinks he’d be able to survive the elements of the wild west, the “Con Air” actor admitted he really wasn’t sure. 

“There was no television. They were reading all the time. They’re reading books. They were these were smart guys,” he said while praising the “extremely intelligent” wranglers. “But the other thing is that they had a level of bravery to be able to get out to the west. To make it in those days, you know, the pioneers and all that, going cross-country … To get there in the first place, you had to have the ‘true grit.’ And I don’t know. I really don’t know. 

“I wouldn’t be able to tell you unless I found out. I’d like to think I’m someone that could survive, but that’s a tough environment.”

Of acting in his first Western, Cage said he “enjoyed the experience.” “I was always thinking about Bronson in the back of my mind, not that I got close to it, but I had him there in my mind,” he shared.

When it came to listing a few of his favorite characters he’s had the opportunity to play, Cage paused only for a minute before reviewing his lengthy resume, which includes “Honeymoon in Vegas” with James Caan, “Valley Girl,” “Peggy Sue Got Married,” “Raising Arizona,” “The Rock,” and “City of Angels.”

“I loved Castor Troy in ‘Face/Off.’ That one really rings a bell. You know, that was a lot of fun,” he said of the ’97 sci-fi, action film with John Travolta. “And I’m sure Peter Lowe in ‘Vampire’s Kiss,’ I think ‘Joe,’ the movie I did with David Gordon Green.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

“I love Rob in ‘Pig.’ I don’t even know if I can watch that movie again because the last time I saw it, I was like, ‘Who is this person? I don’t know. Where did this guy come from? This is amazing. I don’t know who I’m looking at. Who am I watching?'” 

Fans may also be able to expect Cage back as Benjamin Franklin Gates for a third installment of the “National Treasure” series after producer Jerry Bruckheimer said another movie is in the works. The first film was released in 2004 and the follow-up, “National Treasure: Book of Secrets,” came out in 2007. 

“We said we’d like to make another ‘National Treasure’ and they said, ‘Sure, let’s come up with a new cast,” the producer recently told E! News while discussing a spinoff series. Cage isn’t in the TV series, but the movie is being developed with Cage back as the leading man. 

“At the same time, we were developing ‘National Treasure’ for the theaters with Nicolas Cage, which we still are. So, that’s ongoing,” Bruckheimer said.

In the meantime, Cage is enjoying life in Nevada with his wife, Riko Shibata, and their four-month-old daughter, August Francesca Coppola. He also has two sons from previous relationships, Weston and Kal-El.

The “Fast Times at Ridgemont High” actor recalled one famous address from his past with an equally acclaimed owner.

“Starchild from KISS was my landlord. I lived at The Palms for a while,” he reminisced. “Listen, Vegas has been good to me too. I have no complaints. It’s been a good city for me, you know, It’s not like everyone thinks it is. It’s also a small town with some great culture.”

He praised Las Vegas for its “easy living” and said, “I think people are going to start realizing that. It takes years off our lives.”

 

Read More 

 

Biden wants your next airport visit to include a face scan. That’s a huge threat to your freedom

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

In December, the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA), an agency within Biden’s Department of Homeland Security, acknowledged it has significantly expanded facial recognition technology at security checkpoints in airports across the United States. 

Under the expanded program, 16 of the nation’s largest airports are now using face scans as a way to verify the identities of travelers, including in Atlanta, Boston, Denver, and Los Angeles. The TSA’s initial test facial recognition program started under the Trump administration in 2017. 

The system asks passengers to insert a photo identification into a security kiosk and then look at a camera. After a few seconds pass, the machine uses artificial intelligence to compare the face scan with the photo ID. If the system says the two match, the passenger can move forward to his or her gate. If a potential mismatch is identified, a human TSA agent will determine whether to deny access to the traveler. Eventually, humans will be removed from the verification process altogether. 

DELETED BIDEN CAMPAIGN AD SLAMMING BUTTIGIEG’S LACK OF EXPERIENCE RESURFACES AMID MULTIPLE CRISES

If the new program is deemed successful, TSA plans to expand facial recognition at airports nationwide, making it one of the largest efforts to collect advanced biometric data of law-abiding citizens in US history.

The Biden administration says that biometric technology like facial recognition can “enhance security effectiveness, operational efficiency, and the passenger experience,” and in some respects, it most certainly could.

TSA administrator David Pekoske says his agency has found that the facial recognition algorithm is more accurate than human TSA agents, and TSA claims that eventually facial recognition could be combined with government databases to eliminate the need for carrying an ID at the airport completely. But as convenient and effective the program could become, it poses substantial long-term threats to individual liberty that far outweigh its possible benefits. 

The TSA says it will not keep the data associated with most travelers’ facial scans, although some will be retained to test the system’s effectiveness and for law enforcement. And the TSA further promises that under the current iteration of the program, it will allow travelers to opt out of the facial scans entirely. But there is no guarantee that these policies will remain permanently in place, and there are no federal laws that would prevent the TSA from storing biometric data in the future. 

Allowing the TSA to collect and potentially store facial scans would make it much easier for government to track citizens’ every move in the years to come, and it could open the door to significant abuses of power and privacy risks. This might sound like a wild conspiracy theory or plot from a science fiction movie, but authoritarian regimes around the world are already using facial recognition to limit freedom. 

For example, the Chinese government uses on a daily basis its vast surveillance state coupled with facial recognition to track and control its massive population, as part of its social credit system. In Hong Kong in 2019, facial recognition was one of the most important tools used by the China’s Communist Party to rein in protesters seeking to retain personal liberties. 

Similarly, in Russia, Vladimir Putin’s ruthless government has repeatedly used facial recognition to keep tabs on protesters and political opponents. In some cases, Putin’s agents have even used facial recognition to help government agents arrest critics. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Biden is not nearly as authoritarian as the Communist Party of China or Vladimir Putin, of course, but there is no guarantee that he or rogue agents in the federal government won’t abuse facial recognition technology if given the opportunity. And who knows what a future administration might do when given such a powerful tool? 

The U.S. government has already in recent years been caught on numerous occasions unjustly spying on Americans. For example, in 2022, Oregon Democrat Senator Ron Wyden alleged that the Phoenix office of the Homeland Security Investigations had been illegally issuing customs summits to gain access to citizens’ financial data — all without approval from a court. More than 6 million records were allegedly made available to law enforcement agents under potentially illegal subpoenas. 

The Homeland Security Investigations agency, like the TSA, is housed under the Department of Homeland Security. 

There are times when privacy must be limited in order to enhance security, but there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that Biden’s current expansion of facial recognition is one of those moments. Traveling by air is one of the safest forms of transportation in the United States today, and despite there having been very little facial recognition used over the past two decades, we have yet to see a single major terrorist attack involving airplanes since September 11, 2001. Why, then, is it so important for government to use facial recognition to improve safety? 

It is essential for the perseveration of a free society for citizens to have greater control over their government than that government has over citizens. The balance of power has in recent decades been tilting in favor of government, and this move by the Biden administration would undoubtedly continue that disturbing trend. It must be stopped immediately. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM JUSTIN HASKINS

 

Read More 

 

As Biden visits border, still no apology over false claims that Border Patrol agents whipped migrants

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

President Joe Biden will visit the besieged southern border on Sunday, but it is not clear if he will meet with Border Patrol agents or if he will address or apologize for a false claim he made in 2021 when he accused agents of having “strapped” Haitian migrants.

Biden said on Thursday that he will visit El Paso, Texas, where he will assess border enforcement operations and meet with local elected officials and community leaders. He made the announcement during a White House speech *in which he unveiled a slew of measures, including an expanded parole program and a plan to increase returns to Mexico, to deal with the ongoing border crisis.

However, there could be a cloud hanging over the visit with regard to comments he made in September 2021, when he accused agents of having whipped migrants and promised that “they will pay.”

Biden had spoken out after an incident in which Border Patrol agents on horseback were dealing with a surge of more than 10,000 migrants predominantly from Haiti. 

BIDEN ANNOUNCES BORDER VISIT, NEW MEASURES AS PRESSURE GROWS OVER OVERWHELMING MIGRANT SURGE

Photographs of migrants encountering agents zipped around social media as some Democrats and media commentators incorrectly interpreted as showing agents using whips or whipping migrants who were trying to cross the river. In fact, the agents were using split reins to control their horses.

But the incident steamrolled and the conduct of the agents saw condemnation from various administration officials, including, ultimately, Biden.

“To see people treated like they did, horses barely running over, people being strapped — it’s outrageous,” Biden told reporters, making a whipping motion with his hand. “I promise you, those people will pay. There will be an investigation underway now, and there will be consequences. There will be consequences.”

CBP FINDS ‘NO EVIDENCE’ BORDER PATROL AGENTS WHIPPED HAITIAN MIGRANTS BUT STILL SEEKS TO DISCIPLINE THEM

The comments outraged Border Patrol agents at the time, given that it was already clear from video and basic knowledge of operations that no whipping was involved — with many fearing that it was placing political pressure on investigators to fault the agents with something.

But the administration did not back down and the investigation dragged deep into 2022, as the agents involved were put on desk duty.

Ultimately, the Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Professional Responsibility’s investigation found that there was no evidence that agents struck migrants and noted that they do not (and did not) carry whips. The probe did find multiple infractions, but they were a far cry from Biden’s claim that migrants were whipped. CBP said that an agent was found to have used “denigrating and offensive” language against migrants regarding national origin and gender and was also accused of having maneuvered a horse around a child in an “unsafe manner.”

The report also faults agents for using an “unmoderated” tactical radio, of having insufficient training for the situation, and for an “unnecessary use of force” to drive the migrants back.

Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, told Fox News that the incident shows a disregard for the rule of law from the president and a fear of upsetting a left-wing base that dislikes law enforcement.

“If he cared about the rule of law, he would recognize that what he did was wrong. And in recognizing that what he did was wrong, he would make it right,” Judd told Fox News Digital in an interview. “And he refuses to do that. And that’s politics. He knows darn good and well that if he were to make right his wrong, his base would be extremely upset with him.”

When asked if the incident still mattered to the men and women who patrol the border on the front lines, Judd said “absolutely,” accusing Biden of a “guilty until proven innocent” mindset when it comes to agents.

“What we know is that if we do something that gets called into question by his base, he’s going to come after us. That’s what we know. And that’s what was shown through this incident. And the fact that he hasn’t apologized clearly shows that he’s still of that mindset,” he said.

 

Read More 

 

Racially charged attack on Byron Donalds continues left-wing pattern against minority conservatives

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News 

Liberal Rep-elect Cori Bush, D-Mo., prompted outrage when she dismissed colleague Byron Donalds, R-Fla., as a “prop” who is intent on “on upholding and perpetuating white supremacy.” 

Donalds fired back at Bush, and her comments received criticism from figures like Rep. Dan Bishop, R-N.C., on Thursday, who attacked her in a floor speech as Bush was seen smirking by C-SPAN cameras.

Republican official Harmeet Dhillon told Fox News Digital of Bush’s attack, “I think this is a common theme from Democrats to stigmatize any African American or really any minority person who dares to think for themselves, and our party is a party of respecting the individual.”

But it’s not just Democratic politicians who have attacked conservative and Republican people of color. The remark was met with a tame response from the media. 

HOUSE SPEAKER RACE: BYRON DONALDS RESPONDS TO ‘RETRIBUTION’ FOR RUNNING AGAINST KEVIN MCCARTHY

The website Politico referred to Bush’s comment as simply a “sharp jab,” and the online magazine The Root cheered Bush’s remarks, writing, “There’s no doubt that Donalds knows he’s being used—he’s a Black Republican, after all. But at this point, it’s clear he has no problem with it.” The left-wing site HuffPost gave Bush a platform to elaborate, where she said she had no issue with Donalds, but rather the Republicans she accused of using them. She added she was glad conservatives were offended, saying they had demonstrated their ignorance.

The racially charged slam on Donalds is hardly in a vacuum on the left, however, as prominent media personalities and outlets, including figures at “The View,” MSNBC and Los Angeles Times, have in recent years also taken sharp aim at minority Republicans. Twitter also took hours to ban the hashtag “Uncle Tim” for Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., when he gave the response to President Biden’s first address to Congress.

During election night coverage on November 4, 2020, MSNBC host Joy Reid used a racial slur, a variation on “Uncle Tom,” to refer to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Regarding legal challenges to the election, she wondered, “Do any of you guys trust Uncle Clarence and Amy Coney Barrett and those guys to actually follow the letter of the law?” 

More recently, on the July 30, 2022 edition of the now-canceled “Cross Connection,” Elie Mystal dismissed former Georgia Republican senatorial candidate Herschel Walker as “clearly unintelligent” and asserted that he was a willing pawn of white Republicans: “Walker is going to do what he’s told, and that is what Republicans like. That’s what Republicans want from their Negroes: to do what they were told.” 

In September, “The View” co-host Sunny Hostin attacked former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley as a minority who was running from her ethnicity. “What’s her real name again,” she asked on September 21. Talking about Haley, whose given first name is Nimrata, Hostin added, “I think that if she leaned into being someone of color, it’s different.” One of Hostin’s co-hosts noted wryly that Hostin herself goes by the nickname “Sunny” instead of her given name Asunción; fellow co-host Whoopi Goldberg also uses a stage name.

Hostin also raised eyebrows last year when she declared that she didn’t understand Black or Latino Republicans, suggesting no non-whites should be in the party.

‘THE VIEW’ HOST SUNNY HOSTIN DECLARES JOE BIDEN THE REAL ‘WINNER’ AFTER MIDTERMS

Another example includes a writer for the Los Angeles Times in 2021 calling Larry Elder, then a Republican candidate for governor in California, “the black face of white supremacy.” An MSNBC contributor that year also said Elder was “Trumpism in blackface” and received no pushback from left-wing host Nicolle Wallace.

Regarding the attacks on Representative Donalds, Fox News contributor Joe Concha told Fox News Digital that the comments have “no place in public discourse, particularly by a sitting Congresswoman.” Speaking of the media, he noted, “But I’ve seen very little condemnation from those who usually stand on outrage soapboxes for a living and call themselves journalists. If there was any kind of attack like this on, say, Hakeem Jeffries, you could be sure it would be to lead stories for a week with calls for resignation.”

“Not only is there a double standard, the media itself does this. I know this as an Indian American.” added Dhillon.

She described questions like, “‘As an Indian American how can you possibly support the Republican Party,’ as though I’m a zoo animal or a curiosity.”

 

Read More 

 

Prince Harry’s book exposes grief, war, drugs, family rifts

Top News: US & International Top News Stories Today | AP News 

Masks showing Britain’s Prince William, left, Prince Harrry, centre, and his wife Meghan, right, are seen for sale in a shop in London, Friday, Jan. 6, 2023. Prince Harry alleges in a much-anticipated new memoir that his brother Prince William lashed out and physically attacked him during a furious argument over the brothers’ deteriorating relationship. The book “Spare” also included incendiary revelations about the estranged royal’s drug-taking, first sexual encounter and role in killing people during his military service in Afghanistan. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

LONDON (AP) — Bereaved boy, troubled teen, wartime soldier, unhappy royal — many facets of Prince Harry are revealed in his explosive memoir, often in eyebrow-raising detail.

From accounts of cocaine use and losing his virginity to raw family rifts, “Spare” exposes deeply personal details about Harry and the wider royal family.

The Associated Press purchased a copy of the Spanish-language edition of the book ahead of its publication around the world on Tuesday. Its revelations have electrified the British media — but have been met with silence from Buckingham Palace.

BROTHER AND SON

The book opens with a quote from American writer William Faulkner: “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”

Harry’s story is dominated by his rivalry with elder brother Prince William and the death of the boys’ mother, Princess Diana, in 1997. Harry, who was 12 at the time, has never forgiven the media for Diana’s death in a car crash while being pursued by photographers.

The loss of his mother haunts the book, which Harry dedicates to wife Meghan, children Archie and Lili “and, of course, my mother.”

The opening chapter recounts how his father Prince Charles — now King Charles III — broke the news of his mother’s accident, but didn’t give his son a hug.

Hub peek embed (Afghanistan) – Compressed layout (automatic embed)

Harry reveals that years later he asked his driver to take him through the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris, site of the fatal crash, hoping in vain that it would help end a “decade of unrelenting pain. He also says he once consulted a woman who claimed to have “powers” and to be able to pass on messages from Diana.

Harry adds that he and William both “begged” their father not to marry his long-term paramour Camilla Parker-Bowles, worried she would become a “wicked stepmother.”

Harry also is tormented by his status as royal “spare” behind William, who is heir to the British throne. Harry recounts a longstanding sibling rivalry that worsened after Harry began a relationship with American actress Meghan Markle, whom he married in 2018.

He says that during an argument in 2019, William called Meghan “difficult” and “rude,” then grabbed him by the collar and knocked him down. Harry suffered cuts and bruises from landing on a dog bowl.

Harry says Charles implored the brothers to make up, saying after the funeral of Prince Philip in 2021: “Please, boys. Don’t make my final years a misery.”

Neither Buckingham Palace, which represents King Charles III, nor William’s Kensington Palace office has commented on any of the allegations.

WILD TEENAGE YEARS

The memoir suggests the media’s party-boy image of Harry during his teen and young adult years was well-deserved.

Harry describes how he lost his virginity at 17 — in a field behind a pub to an older woman who loved horses and treated the teenage prince like a “young stallion.” It was, he says, a “humiliating episode.”

He also says he took cocaine several times starting at the same age, in order “to feel. To be different.” He also acknowledges using cannabis and magic mushrooms — which made him hallucinate that a toilet was talking to hm.

ARMY REVELATIONS

Harry spent a decade in the British Army, serving twice in Afghanistan. He says that on his second tour, as an Apache helicopter co-pilot and gunner in 2012-2013, he killed 25 Taliban militants. Harry says he felt neither satisfaction nor shame about his actions, and in the heat of battle regarded enemy combatants as pieces being removed from a chessboard, “Baddies eliminated before they could kill Goodies.”

Veterans criticized the comments and said they could increase the security risk for Harry. Retired Col. Richard Kemp said it was “an error of judgment,” and regarding enemy fighters as chess pieces is “not the way the British Army trains people.”

“I think that sort of comment that doesn’t reflect reality is misleading and potentially valuable to those people who wish the British forces and British government harm,” he told the BBC.

The Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan in 2021. Afghan Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Qahar Balkhi called the Western invasion of Afghanistan “odious” and said Harry’s comments “are a microcosm of the trauma experienced by Afghans at the hands of occupation forces who murdered innocents without any accountability.”

PERSONAL JOURNEY

Harry credits Meghan with changing the way he sees the world and himself. He says he was “wrapped in privilege” and had no understanding of unconscious bias before he met her.

The young prince notoriously wore a Nazi uniform to a costume party in 2005, and claims in the book that William and his now-wife Kate encouraged the choice of outfit and “howled” with laughter when they saw it. He was recorded using a racist term about a fellow soldier of Pakistani descent in 2006, but says he did not know the word was a slur.

Meghan and Harry cited the U.K. media’s treatment of the biracial American actress as one of the main reasons for their decision to quit royal duties and move to the U.S. in 2020.

The book gives no sign that royal family relations will be repaired soon. Harry told ITV in an interview to promote the book that he wants reconciliation, but that there must be “accountability” first.

In the final pages, Harry describes how he and William walked side by side during the funeral procession of Queen Elizabeth II in September, but spoke barely a word to one another.

“The next day, Meg and I returned to the United States,” he says.

 

Read More 

[World] Joshimath: Panic in India’s Uttarakhand town over large cracks in homes

BBC News world 

Image caption,

Joshimath residents have said the cracks widened over the past few months

Residents of Joshimath town in Uttarakhand state are demanding evacuation and rehabilitation after large cracks appeared in their homes.

On Thursday, officials stopped several construction projects after thousands of protesters blocked a national highway in the Himalayan state.

The state’s chief minister is holding a high-level meeting on Friday to discuss the issue.

Dozens of people were evacuated to temporary shelters this week.

District officials have said that cracks have developed in more than 500 houses in the area due to gradual land subsidence, which refers to the ground slowly sinking.

This is not a recent problem – in 1976, a government committee had flagged the risks of land sinking in Joshimath after residents complained of cracks in their houses. In its report, the panel had also warned against allowing heavy construction work in the area.

But in the decades since, construction activity has increased manifold in Uttarakhand state, which is situated in the ecologically fragile Himalayan region. The state is home to a number of revered Hindu shrines that draw millions of pilgrims every year.

Rampant construction, experts have said, is damaging the ecological balance of the region, which is vulnerable to earthquakes and landslides.

On Thursday, officials said several construction projects – including the ambitious Char Dham (Hindu pilgrimage route) road-widening project – were being halted “until further orders”.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Media caption,

Joshimath: The scenic Indian town in danger of sinking

In October, the BBC’s Vineet Khare visited Joshimath and spoke to several residents who were living in fear.

“We leave the house the moment it starts raining because we’re scared,” Sumedha Bhatt, who lives in Ravigram village, told him.

On that visit, the BBC found that many people had already begun leaving their houses as the cracks had started widening after heavy rains. Some families had also resorted to makeshift measures, such as using polyethylene sheets to prevent seepage and using wooden planks to offer additional support to their houses.

Geologist Swapnamita Vaideswaran, who has been using archival and satellite imaging to map the scale of the subsidence, said that her work over the past two years showed that Ravigram village was sinking by 85mm per year.

Uttarakhand chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami is expected to visit Joshimath soon.

Read more India stories from the BBC:

 

Read More