Mom’s immune status changes with how she feeds baby




The immune status of postpartum mothers shifts with how she feeds her baby, a new study finds.

According to the paper published in the journal Scientific Reports, certain inflammatory proteins—substances that are secreted as part of an immune response—peak at different times of day, correlating with whether the mothers breastfeed, pump, or formula-feed their babies.

“It’s a great study; there are so many unanswered questions about maternal health in the postpartum period,” says Amy Boddy, a human biologist and evolutionary theorist at the University of California, Santa Barbara anthropology department and the paper’s senior author.

It’s a rare deep look at immunity from the postpartum mother’s perspective, which Boddy hopes will become a springboard for future research.

Indeed, she says, much of the research on the effects of breastfeeding concentrates on the infant, with many findings that demonstrate benefits of breastfeeding to the baby’s immunity and development. In the longer term, mothers who have breastfed also have a lower risk for developing certain cancers and diabetes.

But how about women within the crucial first months to years after childbirth?

To investigate, Boddy, Carmen Hové, the study’s lead author and co-principal investigator, and team followed a population of 96 women in the Seattle area who had given birth within the previous six months and collected their saliva twice over a 24-hour period, once before going to bed, and again in the morning after waking.

Because the COVID-19 pandemic had just hit and everyone was on lockdown, the researchers found themselves with an unexpectedly ideal experimental situation, in which the mothers’ environments were heavily controlled for infections which could confound the immunity readings.

“It was kind of a perfect natural experiment, because we’re looking at immune function and of the reports, no one was sick,” Boddy says. The goal? To follow cyclical levels of five types of proteins (labeled CRP, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) that indicate inflammation that is a marker of immune response.

“It’s been shown before that breastfeeding has a suite of inflammatory responses to it,” Boddy explains. “Inflammation isn’t always a bad thing—the breast is remodeling, functioning, and doing things in the body.”

The proteins’ diurnal patterns meant that generally speaking, concentrations are typically higher in the mornings and lower in the evenings. What the researchers were interested in was seeing out-of-the-ordinary levels in the normal ebb and flow of these proteins and how they matched up with the new mothers’ infant feeding strategies.

For several proteins, there were no measurable deviances in the morning and evening levels no matter whether the mothers pumped or breastfed. However, for the C-reactive protein (CRP) the researchers found that levels peaked in the evenings for women who relied heavily on breastfeeding, reversing the normal diurnal trend.

“We expected that low rates of lactating would be associated with a relatively high morning peak in CRP and vice versa,” Hové says. “What we ended up finding is that among mothers who reported intensive lactation, via either breastfeeding or pumping, CRP was higher at nighttime.” More research is needed to determine the precise effects of this unique pattern in breastfeeding or lactating mothers, she adds.

“We don’t know exactly what’s going on here,” Boddy says, “maybe not emptying your breast fully, leads to inflammation.”

Or maybe it’s the other direction, and the inflammation is a healing response from pregnancy. Maybe the incomplete emptying is a change of behavior due to stress. Perhaps the stress is the result of interrupted sleep that comes with round-the-clock breastfeeding schedules.

“We don’t have the causal arrow of what’s going on; it’s just an association,” she says. “This study shows that there is a unique immune profile, and we should study this in more detail.”

What this study reveals is the true complexity of postpartum breastfeeding. Breastfeeding is part of an ongoing physiological negotiation between mother and the new baby which favors the infant, Boddy says.

“There’s something in evolutionary biology called maternal-fetal conflict. The idea is, when you’ve two bodies in one maternal unit, that the baby always wants a little more than the mother has to give,” she explains. This research dives into the gray area of postpartum health from the mother’s perspective, particularly in the realm of breastfeeding and immunity.

Indeed, despite the ideal, long promoted by institutes such as the World Health Organization that “breast is best,” the researchers found that even from their sample of educated, relatively affluent women, there existed a combination of lactation feeding strategies, highlighting challenges of exclusive at-the-nipple feeding.

“There’s been a lot of pushback, mostly from lactating mothers, centered around time constraints. Our society doesn’t make it easy for us to actually breastfeed and have lactational support,” says Boddy, who nursed both her children as infants and found it “challenging to meet breastfeeding goals.”

In addition, the guidelines aren’t clear on when breastfeeding should end. When do the physiological and other benefits diminish for the mother in this ongoing negotiation, which could last years? Could this information yield some insight on other trends, such as maternal mortality?

The researchers hope to study the topic more deeply, and on a more individual level, to tease out further patterns in postpartum health and breastfeeding, such as with the various hormones involved in lactation.

“I think this study has opened up more questions than what we’ve answered. What we would like to do is follow some of these same women throughout the course of their postpartum experience,” Boddy says. “It’s always been challenging to find the best way of feeding our babies and breastfeeding is so demanding.”

Source: UC Santa Barbara

source

Arizona county to build bridge over creek where 3 children drowned

Nearly five years after three young children died in northern Arizona’s Tonto Creek, Gila County is using a $21 million federal grant to build a bridge over part of the stream.

County officials announced Wednesday that the bridge is more than 94% complete and should have two-way traffic crossing by the end of this month.

The project began in September 2022, funded by the county and a Federal Highway Administration grant.

ARIZONA IS BOOSTING EFFORTS TO PROTECT PEOPLE FROM THE EXTREME HEAT AFTER HUNDREDS DIED LAST SUMMER

The bridge was designed to help people who cross the creek daily on their way home or make trips to the grocery store, school and post office.

Tonto Creek is nearly 73 miles long on the north edge of the Tonto National Forest and the stream flows year round.

Arizona news graphic

Gila County, Arizona, is using federal grant money to build a bridge over an area where three children died five years prior. (Fox News)

In November 2019, a couple headed to a family member’s home tried to cross the swollen creek with seven children in their military-style vehicle.

The couple disregarded signs and barricades that told motorists not to cross.

The husband and wife and four of the children managed to get out of the vehicle and were rescued.

But three other children — a 5-year-old boy, a 6-year-old girl and a 5-year-old male cousin — were swept away and died.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The couple avoided prison terms and were each sentenced to several years of probation in January 2022.

source

US pauses bomb shipments to Israel over Rafah concerns

An Israeli airstrike in Gaza City killed at least eight people, according to witnesses and Dr. Amjad Ailawa of the Al-Ahli Baptist hospital. 

The doctor also said children were among those killed, and that dozens had also been injured.

Eyewitnesses on the ground told CNN no warning was given by the Israeli military before it struck a four story building in the Al-Daraj neighborhood, in the eastern part of the city.

“All of a sudden, I heard a loud explosion, I didn’t know where the airstrike hit exactly but I got injured in my hand and in my back,” one man who didn’t want to be named told CNN. “I ran away quickly because the scene was really terrifying. There was a large number of killed…”

CNN footage of the aftermath showed the impact on the building, as well as the debris from the explosion all across the road. Shredded fabric and the remains of personal belongings were also seen amid what was left of the apartment.

Some of the deceased children could be seen being carried away, their bodies wrapped and carefully placed atop a donkey cart.

“These are the targets of Israel,” a man, walking alongside the cart said, as he pointed towards the bodies.

CNN has reached out to the Israeli military for comment on this incident but has yet to hear back.

source

New method makes more efficient solar cells at room temp




Researchers have developed a method to make high-quality perovskite films at room temperature.

Finding reliable, eco-friendly power sources is crucial as our world grapples with increasing energy needs and the urgent call to combat climate change. Solar energy offers one solution, with scientists devising ever more efficient materials for capturing sunlight.

Perovskite solar cells have emerged as a promising alternative to conventional, silicon solar cells, boasting a number of advantages. But processing the material has been a complicated affair.

The new innovation not only simplified the production process but also increased the material’s efficiency from under 20% to 24.4%.

The details appear in the journal Joule.

Perovskite is a class of materials characterized by its specific crystal structure, exemplified by the mineral of the same name. Solar cells made from this material boast many advantages compared to silicon-based solar cells. They’re lightweight, flexible, and can be applied as a spray or printed like ink. Perovskite solar cell production also has the potential for a smaller carbon footprint than silicon photovoltaics, which require high temperatures and a cleanroom environment.

That said, producing these cells involves high-temperature annealing and tricky post-treatment steps, significantly slowing fabrication and making it hard to incorporate them into everyday items. These factors impede perovskite’s adoption in large-scale manufacturing and make them less environmentally friendly.

By fine tuning the material’s chemical composition, the authors developed a perovskite ink that created high-quality films much more effectively.

“Our method follows the same procedures as the conventional one, except for omitting the two most time-consuming steps: thermal annealing and post-treatment,” says co-lead author Ahra Yi, a postdoctoral researcher at UC Santa Barbara. The simpler fabrication technique also meshes better with standard manufacturing processes and reduces the overall energy use, which lowers its carbon dioxide emissions.

What’s more, the new material outperformed cells made using the high-temperature process.

“Our optimized perovskite solar cell achieved a remarkable efficiency of 24.4%,” says co-lead author and doctoral student Sangmin Chae, “surpassing previous limits, which were below 20% for room-temperature processed devices.”

The new procedure is also extremely gentle. To demonstrate this, the team prepared a perovskite layer on fresh leaves, a feat that was impossible with the previous, high-temperature process.

A leaf without any coating on it sits next to a leaf with a silvery coating covering its surface.
A thin perovskite film coats a fresh leaf. (Credit: Ahra Yi and Sangmin Chae et al.)

“We thought this choice would be both eye-catching and symbolic, since solar cells mimic the photosynthetic process in leaves,” says Yi.

This versatility opens up a wide range of possible applications. It’s well suited for flexible indoor and outdoor energy generation.

“With our approach, we can now contemplate the development of high-efficiency solar cells with free-form designs capable of powering the ever-increasing array of wearable electronics, sensors, displays, security cameras, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, et cetera,” says senior author Thuc-Quyen Nguyen, and professor and director of the UCSB Center for Polymers & Organic Solids.

Source: UC Santa Barbara

source

Fani Willis suggests she won't testify in 'unlawful' Georgia Senate investigation

Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis suggested the state Senate’s investigation into her was “unlawful” and indicated she would not cooperate with a subpoena from them. 

“Well, first of all, I don’t even think they have the authority to subpoena me, but they need to learn the law,” Willis said after being asked if she would appear in front of a Georgia Senate committee without being required by a subpoena. 

When a reporter pressed her on it, asking “yes or no” if she would appear, Willis said, “I will not appear to anything that is unlawful.”

NPR CEO KATHERINE MAHER DECLINES HOUSE HEARING INVITE AMID BIAS SCANDAL

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis indicated she would not comply with a subpoena. (Alex Slitz-Pool/Getty Images)

The district attorney’s responses were prompted by the committee chairman, Republican Bill Cowsert, and his reported claim that he would subpoena her if she did not appear on her own. 

A Republican-led Georgia Senate investigative committee was established in January to investigate whether Willis misused taxpayer funds in her indictment of former President Trump and others on racketeering charges. 

FLIGHTS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WITHOUT IDS TARGETED IN FAA BILL AS DEADLINE LOOMS

Georgia Republicans

Bill Cowsert, center right, is chairman of the committee. (AP Photo/Jeff Amy)

After a recent committee hearing, Cowsert told WSB-TV Channel 2 Atlanta’s Richard Elliot, “If she’s not willing to come and explain her conduct, then we will subpoena her and ask her to come, require her to come.” 

“I have not broken the law in any way,” Willis told reporters at a press conference this week. “I’m sorry folks get p—ed off that everyone gets treated equally.”

WHITE HOUSE LOOKS TO CONVINCE AMERICANS OF ‘BIDENOMICS’ WITH KAMALA HARRIS TOUR

Fulton County DA Fani Willis

DA Fani Willis maintained she had not broken any laws. (Getty Images)

Fox News Digital’s inquiries to the DA’s office and the Georgia Senate press office for Cowsert did not immediately receive a response. 

Trump was initially indicted in the Fulton County case in August 2023 alongside 18 others under Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act for their alleged actions in a scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election. 

ALL GOP SENATORS PRESS BIDEN NOT TO SUPPORT EXPANDING WHO PANDEMIC AUTHORITY

Nathan Wade

Nathan Wade resigned following the judge’s ruling. (Alex Slitz-Pool/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Earlier this year, it was discovered that Willis had a romantic relationship with Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor she hired to take on the case. Ultimately, Wade resigned from the case after the judge determined there were no grounds to disqualify Willis, but that she could only remain on the case without Wade.

Trump’s legal team has since moved to appeal the judge’s ruling that she could stay on the case. 


source

Trump trial judge compared to 'corrupt dictatorships' as Stormy Daniels unleashes salacious testimony

Legal experts railed against former pornographic actress Stormy Daniels’ salacious testimony as “prejudicial” on Tuesday, as former President Trump’s legal team moved for a mistrial that ultimately failed in the action-packed court day.  

“I used to try cases for a living. I still have a pretty good sense of what evidence is relevant, what is prejudicial and what is completely over-the-top inadmissible. What the judge is letting in today in the Trump trial in NYC will be remembered as a dark stain on our judicial system, reminiscent of corrupt dictatorships. Shame on the prosecution for undermining our judicial system,” David Friedman, a lawyer and former U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration, posted on X

The comment came ahead of Trump’s legal team moving for a mistrial as Daniels went into detail regarding her alleged sexual encounter with the real estate mogul in 2006.

“THE PROSECUTION, WHICH HAS NO CASE, HAS GONE TOO FAR. MISTRIAL!” Trump posted on Truth Social Tuesday.

LIVE UPDATES: NY V TRUMP TRIAL RESUMES WITH WITNESS TESTIMONY AFTER JUDGE MERCHAN THREATENS TRUMP WITH JAIL TIME

Stormy Daniels is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger during former U.S. President Donald Trump's criminal trial

This courtroom sketch shows Stormy Daniels as she is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger during former President Trump’s criminal trial in New York City on May 7, 2024. (Reuters/Jane Rosenberg)

“This Witch Hunt is FALSE ANCIENT HISTORY that was fully adjudicated by the Voters in the 2016 Presidential Election. It only has to do with Election Interference, and trying to help Crooked Joe Biden get elected because he can’t do it by himself. It is a vicious attack by the Soros backed D.A., Alvin Bragg, in strict coordination with the D.O.J. and the White House, on Biden’s Political Opponent, ME. IT IS ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, AND STRICTLY THIRD WORLD COUNTRY!”  

The motion for a mistrial was ultimately denied by presiding Judge Juan Merchan. 

NY V TRUMP: JUDGE DENIES MOTION FOR MISTRIAL AMID STORMY DANIELS TESTIMONY

Former U.S. President Donald Trump attends his trial

Former President Trump attends his criminal trial in New York City on May 7, 2024. (Win McNamee/Pool via Reuters)

Daniels detailed to the court that she met Trump in 2006 at Lake Tahoe during a celebrity golf tournament. She alleged that the pair had sex in Trump’s hotel room during the event, which Trump has repeatedly denied in public comments. Daniels’ testimony also included describing to the court how she got into the pornography business after working as an exotic dancer as a teenager.

The case revolves around the alleged falsification of business records. Prosecutors say Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, paid Daniels $130,000 to quiet her claims of the alleged extramarital sexual encounter. Prosecutors allege the Trump Organization reimbursed Cohen and fraudulently logged the payments as legal expenses, and they are working to prove that Trump falsified records with the intent to commit or conceal a second crime, which is a felony.

STORMY DANIELS TAKES STAND IN TRUMP CRIMINAL TRIAL

Legal experts sounded off on social media that Daniels’ testimony was irrelevant to the case and that it should not have been admitted into the record.

Stormy Daniels is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger before Justice Juan Merchan during former U.S. President Donald Trump's criminal trial

This courtroom sketch shows Stormy Daniels as she is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger during former President Trump’s criminal trial in New York City on May 7, 2024. (Reuters/Jane Rosenberg)

“The salacious testimony of Stormy Daniels is not only prejudicial, but irrelevant, so by no rationale under the evidentiary rule should it have been admitted,” attorney David Limbaugh posted on X.

“Stormy Daniels testified against Trump this morning, going into salacious detail about the alleged sexual encounter. This is irrelevant. It has no bearing on the issue in the trial, which is whether Trump hid the payment to her in order to influence the 2016 election,” an Indianapolis civil rights attorney wrote in a post. “In a fair trial the judge would exclude that line of questioning.”

“In a flagrant violation of NY’s rules of evidence and judicial ethics guidelines, the judge is allowing Stormy Daniels to ‘run wild’ with her highly prejudicial testimony, running roughshod over the objections of Trump’s attorneys, and allowing Daniels to vividly discuss every last salacious detail about the alleged interaction she had with Trump,” posted Paul Ingrassia, a lawyer and communications direction for the National Constitutional Law Union.

EX-TOP BIDEN DOJ OFFICIAL NOW PROSECUTING TRUMP WAS ONCE PAID BY DNC FOR ‘POLITICAL CONSULTING’

“Prosecutors are asking how tall she is relative to Trump and whether there was a power dynamic between them. Now asking about their alleged sexual affair, the position they were in, whether they were intoxicated, ‘uncomfortable,’ and ‘how they closed it off,’” Ingrassia added, calling the questioning and testimony “totally out of line.”

The former president’s son, Eric Trump, also weighed in on the testimony, calling it “garbage.” Eric Trump attended court again with the 45th president on Tuesday, where he viewed witness testimony.

“Perspective: Sitting front row attempting to figure out how any of this garbage from 20 years ago relates to ‘legal’ bills submitted by a long time (sic) personal attorney being booked as a ‘legal’ expense – but I digress,” Eric Trump posted to his X account on Tuesday. 

“To be clear, they don’t give a s— about the merits of this case – the 15 Manhattan prosecutors are sitting at their table and behind in the courthouse pews, giddy by this salacious show. This is the intent, not the merits, nor the fact that this entire case is a massive extortion play,” he continued.

NY V TRUMP: MAYOR ADAMS SAYS RIKERS ISLAND IS ‘PREPARED’ IF TRUMP IS SENTENCED TO JAIL

Judge Merchan poses for photo

Judge Juan Merchan (AP Photos/File)

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley said Daniels is “an entirely unnecessary witness,” with her testimony serving as a “form of punishment” against Trump.

“And the problem with what the judge has done here is that this is an entirely unnecessary witness. It is uncontested that there’s an NDA. … What happened in their relationship, if there was one, is immaterial to how those payments were denoted by the Trump campaign. So, the court had the opportunity repeatedly to say, ‘We’re not going to take this courtroom through details of this relationship,'” Turley said on Fox News.

“This is a form of punishment. They’re trying to use a witness for punitive purposes and, in my view, political purposes, and this is what happens. And it happened because the judge lost control of his courtroom.”

Following a break Tuesday morning, Merchan said prosecutors were going into too much detail when questioning Daniels.

“The degree of detail we’re going into is unnecessary,” the judge told Manhattan prosecutor Susan Hoffinger, asking her to move the testimony along.

ERIC TRUMP SLAMS STORMY’S TESTIMONY FROM FRONT ROW COURT SEAT: ‘GARBAGE’

The defense team repeatedly objected to the prosecutors’ questions, which included intimate details of the alleged sexual encounter. Trump’s team argued there was no need for the details, adding there was also an issue with her credibility and noting Daniels had signed a statement in 2018 saying the sex act didn’t happen.

Daniels confirmed in testimony that she had signed the 2018 statement but did not do so “willingly,” alleging it was not factual and that she was under a nondisclosure agreement.

Stormy Daniels stands in front of a pink background

Stormy Daniels (Phillip Faraone/Getty Images/File)

As Trump’s team moved for a mistrial, attorney Todd Blanche told the court that the district attorney’s office, which is headed by Democrat Alvin Bragg, was working to inflame the jury with testimony that had no bearing on the case.

TRUMP SAYS JAIL TIME TO DEFEND FREE SPEECH IS ‘SACRIFICE’ HE’S WILLING TO MAKE

Merchan said Tuesday that a mistrial is not warranted but that some of Daniels’ testimony should have been “left unsaid,” and he noted he was surprised the defense team did not object more frequently during the testimony.

“I agree that it would have been better if some of these things had been left unsaid,” he said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“I will also note that I was surprised that there weren’t more objections” from Trump’s legal team, Merchan added, saying the defense team needed to take some responsibility.


source

Why parrotlets adopt (or kill) their rivals’ babies




Competition over love and real estate drives two extreme behaviors in green-rumped parrotlets, a new study finds—either caring for or killing one another’s babies.

Infanticide and adoption in the animal kingdom have long puzzled scientists. While both males and females of many species are known to kill the babies of their rivals to secure sexual or social advantage, other animals have been observed caring for the young of dead or missing comrades.

In a new study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers present nearly 30 years of observations revealing why both of these extreme behaviors are surprisingly common among the small South American birds.

“In parrotlets, infanticide and adoption revolve around real estate and love,” says study senior author Steven Beissinger, a professor of environmental science, policy, and management at the University of California, Berkeley.

“Most of the infanticide attacks happened when a breeding pair was attacked by another pair that was trying to take over a coveted nest site. It also occurred when males wanted to breed with a widow who already had offspring—but we were surprised to find that these new males were just as likely to adopt the offspring as attack them.”

Since 1988, Beissinger has led a team of biologists observing a community of green-rumped parrotlets residing on a cattle ranch in Guárico, Venezuela. While most wild parrots live in the forest canopy—making them very difficult to track and study—green-rumped parrotlets prefer to nest in hollowed-out trees and fence posts in grasslands.

To observe the family dynamics of these birds, Beissinger crafted artificial nesting sites out of large PVC pipes and installed them throughout the ranch. He also began color-banding the parrotlets to track individuals and their relationships.

Early in the study, Beissinger and his former graduate student Scott Stoleson were surprised to find dead babies in a nest, with no clear indication of what had killed them.

“At low population levels, it’s all love and peace, right? But then when you get to high population densities, it’s a bloodbath.”

“We couldn’t tell if something had attacked them, or if they had died from disease, or something else,” Beissinger says. “But when we were watching some of the nests, all of a sudden in went a male who didn’t belong—who wasn’t a parent at that nest—and out he came with a little bit of blood on his beak.”

The sight gave Beissinger the first clue that infanticide might be happening among the parrotlets, and he began tracking instances of the behavior. The study includes observations of more than 2,700 nests between 1988 and 2015.

While infanticide in mammals and birds is still poorly understood, it often appears to be motivated by sexual selection, or the drive to reproduce. For instance, a male may kill the offspring of a widowed female so that he can mate with her more quickly.

However, among parrotlets, competition over nesting sites appears to be the primary motivation for attacks. Parrotlets killed or wounded nestlings and eggs at 256 of the nests that the biologists monitored. In most cases, the attacks were carried out by a single parrotlet or a breeding pair that later claimed the nesting site for themselves.

These attacks occurred more often when the parrotlet population was high and competition for good nesting sites was fierce.

“At low population levels, it’s all love and peace, right? But then when you get to high population densities, it’s a bloodbath,” says coauthor Karl Berg, an associate professor in the School of Integrative Biological and Chemical Sciences at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley in Brownsville who has worked with Beissinger on the project for more than 20 years.

“It’s not that everybody’s born a killer, but the urge to breed is very strong. When the resources provided by the environment aren’t enough for all individuals to breed, they seek out alternative strategies. Unfortunately, that involves killing innocent little offspring.”

Infanticide also occurred in nests where one parent had died and the surviving parent had found a new mate. However, these new mates were just as likely to adopt the unrelated offspring as kill them—and choosing to become a stepparent ultimately did not hurt the parrotlet’s reproductive success.

“Adoption may be a lot easier to accept than infanticide, but it’s actually more difficult to understand because it challenges Darwin’s ideas about natural selection,” Berg says. “It was very interesting to see that the reproductive fitness outcomes were about even between adoption and infanticide and suggests that they have an alternative strategy—adoption may be a nonviolent means of getting genes into the next generation.”

The study also found that males who adopted unrelated offspring went on to nest with widowed females and started breeding at younger ages than their competitors.

“Stepfathers scored love—a new mate—and real estate—a nest site!” says Beissinger.

The National Science Foundation, the Smithsonian Institution, and the National Geographic Society, funded the work, with additional support from the A. Starker Leopold Chair in Wildlife Biology and the Maxwell-Hanrahan Foundation.

Source: UC Berkeley

source

Bragg prosecutor leading Stormy Daniels questioning in Trump trial donated to Joe Biden, Democrats

FIRST ON FOX: The prosecutor from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office leading questioning of adult film actress Stormy Daniels in former President Trump’s unprecedented criminal trial donated to President Biden’s campaign in 2020 and a number of other Democratic politicians and organizations over the years, Fox News Digital has learned. 

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger questioned Daniels Tuesday as she testified as part of former President Trump’s unprecedented criminal trial. 

Trump defense attorneys told Judge Juan Merchan Tuesday afternoon they would motion for a mistrial amid Daniels’ “prejudicial” testimony. Hoffinger said the claim was without basis, and Merchan ultimately denied the defense’s request. 

EX-TOP BIDEN DOJ OFFICIAL NOW PROSECUTING TRUMP WAS ONCE PAID BY DNC FOR ‘POLITICAL CONSULTING’

Hoffinger’s donations to Biden came during the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries, Federal Election Commission records show. 

Stormy Daniels is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger during former U.S. President Donald Trump's criminal trial

Stormy Daniels is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger during former U.S. President Donald Trump’s criminal trial on charges that he falsified business records to conceal money paid to silence porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016, in Manhattan state court in New York City, U.S. May 7, 2024 in this courtroom sketch.  (REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg)

Hoffinger donated $500 to Biden’s presidential campaign in 2020 — a donation of $250 in February 2020 and another donation of $250 in March 2020.

Hoffinger also donated more than $900 to ActBlue during the 2020 cycle. ActBlue is an online fundraising platform for Democratic candidates, progressive organizations, and nonprofits. 

Hoffinger also donated to a number of other Democratic congressional campaigns in 2020 and 2018. Hoffinger was hired by Bragg’s office in 2022, after the political contributions were made.

The revelations come as Republicans investigate alleged politicization of the case against Trump. 

“Joe Biden’s witch hunt against President Donald Trump happening in New York City is blatant election interference,” House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik told Fox News Digital Tuesday. “The lead Democrat prosecutor is a donor to Joe Biden just like the judge.” 

BRAGG ‘ALLOWED POLITICAL MOTIVATIONS’ TO ‘INFECT’ PROSECUTION OF TRUMP, HOUSE JUDICIARY GOP SAYS

Merchan donated $15 to Biden’s campaign in July 2020. Merchan also made small donations to other Democratic groups in 2020. 

Stefanik told Fox News Digital that “Democrats know they cannot defeat President Trump at the ballot box and have resorted to a desperate lawfare campaign in hopes of saving Joe Biden.” 

“The American people can see through this, and that is why President Trump will win come November,” Stefanik said. 

Fox News Digital first reported that another top prosecutor on Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s team was paid by the Democratic National Committee for his “political consulting” work.

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks during a news conference on Thursday, March 7, 2024, in Manhattan, New York. (Barry Williams/New York Daily News/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo joined Bragg’s office after the resignations of Mark Pomerantz and Carey Dunne — prosecutors who were investigating Trump and resigned in protest of Bragg’s initial unwillingness to indict the former president. Colangelo left a senior role at the Biden Justice Department to join Bragg’s team. Bragg afterward brought charges against the former president in April 2023, raising questions among some in the GOP about alleged politicization of the case. 

House Republicans are investigating Colangelo and his past work as he prosecutes Trump. 

Stormy Daniels is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger before Justice Juan Merchan during former U.S. President Donald Trump's criminal trial

Stormy Daniels is questioned by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger before Justice Juan Merchan during former U.S. President Donald Trump’s criminal trial on charges that he falsified business records to conceal money paid to silence porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016, in Manhattan state court in New York City, U.S. May 7, 2024 in this courtroom sketch. (REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg)

According to Federal Election Commission records reviewed by Fox News Digital, DNC Services Corp/Democratic National Committee paid Colangelo twice on Jan. 31, 2018. Colangelo was given two payments of $6,000, for a total of $12,000. 

The “description” for the purpose of payment is labeled “Political Consulting.” 

Neither the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office nor the DNC responded to Fox News Digital’s request for comment about Colangelo’s work. 

At the time, Colangelo was serving in then-New York Attorney General Eric Scheiderman’s office as the deputy attorney general for social justice, assuming the role from Bragg. Bragg, at the time, was appointed as chief deputy attorney general. 

Schneiderman resigned in May 2018 amid allegations of sexual assault. Barbara Underwood replaced him as New York attorney general. 

Just months after Colangelo received the payments from the DNC, in June 2018, Underwood, with Colangelo as executive deputy attorney general, filed a lawsuit against the Trump Foundation. The lawsuit claimed that Trump used the foundation’s charitable assets to pay off his legal obligations. The Trump Foundation ultimately agreed to dissolve in December 2018.  

Matthew Colangelo sketch in court

Todd Blanche, lawyer of former U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks from a podium at a hearing next to prosecutor Matthew Colangelo at the Manhattan Federal Court over Trump’s push to move his criminal case to federal court, in New York City, U.S. June 27, 2023 in a courtroom sketch.  (REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg)

NY V. TRUMP: HOUSE JUDICIARY INVESTIGATES BRAGG PROSECUTOR WHO HELD SENIOR ROLE IN BIDEN DOJ

Colangelo joined Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office in December 2022. 

Prior to his work in New York and in the Biden Justice Department, Colangelo worked in the Obama administration, serving in a number of different roles. Colangelo worked in the DOJ’s civil rights division and served as the chief of staff to then-Labor Secretary Tom Perez, who later served as chair of the DNC in 2017. Perez was DNC chairman at the time Colangelo was paid for “political consulting.” 

TRUMP PROSECUTOR QUIT TOP DOJ POST FOR LOWLY NY JOB IN LIKELY BID TO ‘GET’ FORMER PRESIDENT, EXPERT SAYS

Colangelo also worked as a deputy assistant to then-President Obama and as the deputy director of the White House Economic Council. 

Bragg charged Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. 

Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts. 

A charge of falsifying business records typically is a misdemeanor, but Bragg, Colangelo and New York prosecutors must convince the jury that Trump allegedly falsified those records in the furtherance of “another crime.” 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Prosecutors suggest that the other crime was in violation of a New York State law — conspiracy to prevent or promote election. On its face, as a stand-alone offense, that charge is also typically a misdemeanor. 

Coupling the alleged falsification of business records with alleged prevention or promotion of election becomes a felony crime, according to Bragg. 

source

Stormy Daniels testifies in Trump's hush money trial

Former President Donald Trump sits in court while adult film actress Stormy Daniels testifies on Tuesday.
Former President Donald Trump sits in court while adult film actress Stormy Daniels testifies on Tuesday. Jane Rosenberg

Adult film star Stormy Daniels dished out salacious details of her sexual encounter with former President Donald Trump in 2006 from the witness stand on Tuesday, describing how they met at a celebrity golf tournament and what she says happened when she went to Trump’s Lake Tahoe hotel room.

In a mostly casual and conversational tone, Daniels recounted details from the floors and furniture in Trump’s hotel room to the contents of his toiletry kit in the bathroom. At one point in court, Daniels threw back her arm and lifted her leg in the witness box to re-create the moment she says Trump posed on his hotel bed for her, stripped down to his undergarments.

But some details Daniels described were so explicit that Judge Juan Merchan cut her off at several points. And Trump’s lawyers argued that Daniels had unfairly prejudiced the jury, asking Merchan to declare a mistrial. The judge denied the request but added that some of the details from Daniels were “better left unsaid.”

Here are takeaways from Day 13 of the trial:

Hush money came after “Access Hollywood” tape controversy: Daniels would go on to describe how she stayed touch with Trump, even coming to briefly see him at Trump Tower to talk about the “Celebrity Apprentice” reality show. Daniels said that in 2015 after Trump began running for president, her then-publicist Gina Rodriguez tried to sell her story. But Rodriguez didn’t find much interest until after the “Access Hollywood” tape of Trump was released in October 2016 – eventually leading to the discussions with AMI and then Michael Cohen, who paid Daniels $130,000 not to go public with her case.

Judge denies Trump’s mistrial motion: Trump’s lawyers argued the judge should declare a mistrial after the morning of salacious testimony from Daniels. Trump still vehemently denies the allegations, his attorney Todd Blanche said, arguing there was no way to “un-ring that bell” for jurors who have now heard unfairly prejudicial testimony. Blanche argued that the testimony had nothing to do with the district attorney’s case about falsifying business records.

Defense accuses Daniels of lying for profit: Trump attorney Susan Necheles didn’t take long to challenge Daniels’ story in cross-examination, accusing the adult film actress of hating Trump.

  • “Am I correct that you hate President Trump?” Necheles asked
  • “Yes,” Daniels said.
  • “You want him to go to jail?” Necheles continued.
  • “I want him to be held accountable,” Daniels responded.

Daniels’ body language was tense and her tone notably shifted as Necheles attempted to dismantle her credibility. Daniels gave short, terse answers to many of her questions, defiantly responding “false” and “no” while disputing Necheles’ assertions that she had made up details in her story or that she was trying to extort Trump.

Read more takeaways from Tuesday’s testimony

source