Damar Hamlin ‘awake and showing improvement,’ teammate says

Just In | The Hill 

Buffalo Bills cornerback Kaiir Elam, a teammate of Bills safety Damar Hamlin, said on Thursday that Hamlin is “awake and showing improvement” as he continues to recover from a cardiac arrest episode suffered during his team’s Monday Night Football contest against the Cincinnati Bengals. 

“Our boy is doing better, awake and showing more signs of improvement,” Elam,  a former University of Florida standout who’s in his rookie season with the Bills, wrote in a tweet. “Thank you God. Keep the prayers coming please. All love 3!”

In a separate statement, the team said that Hamlin, while still in critical condition, has shown “remarkable improvement” within the past day, as medical officials at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center still continue to tend to the injured player. 

“While still critically ill, he has demonstrated that he appears to be neurologically intact,” the team said in a statement. “His lungs continue to heal and he is making steady progress. We are grateful for the love and support we have received.”

The update comes three days after Hamlin, a former standout at the University of Pittsburgh, suffered cardiac arrest when he completed his tackle of Bengals wide receiver Tee Higgins during the first quarter of Monday’s game.

Hamlin, who was drafted in the sixth round of the 2021 NFL Draft, stood up after the play was over, only to collapse onto the ground a few seconds later. The game was suspended and medical authorities administrated CPR on the field before he was taken to a local medical facility by ambulance. 

Hamlin’s uncle,  Dorrian Glenn, told CNN in an interview that Hamlin had to be resuscitated twice by medical officials after the episode, saying it was heartbreaking to see. 

The Bills-Bengals MNF contest has been postponed due to Hamlin’s injury, as players and coaches on both teams were visibly shaken by the incident involving the 24-year-old safety. The NFL has announced that the game will not resume this week, as they have made no decision on resuming the contest at a later date, according to ESPN. 

In response to the incident, fans have raised more than $7.1 million for Hamlin’s charitable foundation, the Chasing M’s Foundation Community Toy Drive, through the foundation’s GoFundMe page, surpassing its initial $2,500 goal.

​Blog Briefing Room, News, damar hamlin, Kaiir Elam Read More 

A silver lining for House Speaker election: Freedom for C-SPAN

Just In | The Hill 

The failure to elect a Speaker so far in the House has one silver lining, at least for TV viewers.

C-SPAN, the public service network that televises congressional proceedings and other matters, has full freedom to focus on whatever its camera operators find interesting — for the moment.

Under normal circumstances, the majority party imposes strictures on the kind of shots that can be filmed. The limits have held during periods of both Republican and Democratic control.

But on Tuesday and Wednesday, with everything in flux, C-SPAN camera operators have been able to pick up far more interesting details. Viewers have seen ideological opposites Reps. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in conversation Tuesday, and anti-McCarthy hardliner Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) in a series of animated exchanges Wednesday.

Explaining the situation online, CSPAN Capitol Hill producer Craig Caplan tweeted Wednesday:

“C-SPAN was given permission to be in the House chamber for opening day of 118th Congress including the Speaker election last yr by Speaker Pelosi. Our live coverage resumes today with our own cameras until members are sworn in & then continues through the gov’t-controlled cameras.” 

The new — and presumably temporary — freedom has been greeted with enthusiasm by CNN’s Jake Tapper on-air and by a number of other journalists and politics-watchers on Twitter:

“The added camera angles allowed on C-SPAN due to lack of House rules were great,” tweeted Erik Wasson, Congressional reporter for Bloomberg. “Lawmakers would be wise to allow them permanently if they want better ratings.”

“It is such a shame that [C-SPAN] does not ALWAYS control the cameras in the House chamber. Such an important and revealing POV,” Politico reporter Anthony Adragna tweeted.

​House, House Republicans, House Speaker vote, Kevin McCarthy Read More 

1 In 3 BMWs Sold In The UK Last Year Came With A Plug

Carscoops 

BMW is keeping its options open when it comes to electric power by continuing to develop combustion cars and hydrogen-powered vehicles alongside its electric saloons, coupes, and SUVs. But British BMW buyers are so taken with the brand’s EVs and PHEVs that one in three BMWs sold in the UK last year came with a plug.

The company tripled its UK electric sales in 2022 to 21,480, meaning one in every five BMWs sold in the UK during the last 12 months was a full EV. Factor in the success of the firm’s plug-in hybrid models and you get to a total of 38,045 chargeable cars and that 33 percent figure for plug-in vehicle sales.

BMW GB puts much of the credit for its growth in the electrified sector down to the newly introduced i4 and iX, which joined the iX3 SUV and helped make up for the demise of the i3 part of the way through the year.

And that’s just the BMW brand. The BMW Group also includes Mini, whose Mini Electric EV accounted for a quarter of all Mini hatch models, while the popularity of the Mini Countryman PHEV resulted in one in every five Minis sold being equipped with a charging port.

Related: 2024 BMW i5 Touring Spied As An Electrifying SUV Alternative

Overall, BMW Group cars accounted for 11 percent of the UK EV market, up from 7.2 percent last year. And the arrival of the i7 and iX1 could further strengthen BMW’s grip on the market during 2023, while the i5 scheduled for launch later this year will give the company’s electric portfolio a boost the following year.

The figures also show that while BMW’s EV sales grew 199 percent in 2022, the company’s overall sales numbers fell by 7 percent to 116,577 units. But there’s certainly no shortage of demand for at least two combustion-powered BMW products: the M2 and M3 Touring have both amassed a six-month order bank.

Read More 

Here are the best states for work-life balance

Just In | The Hill 

Story at a glance

Washington, New York, California and Rhode Island rounded out the top five spots. 

Rankings focused on how each state’s businesses value employees’ work-life balance and included factors like paid sick leave, maternity leave and minimum wage. 

Louisiana, Tennessee and South Dakota took the bottom three spots.

Connecticut is the best state in the country for workers looking to achieve an optimal work-life balance, according to results of a new ranking. The northeastern state was joined by Washington, New York, California, and Rhode Island, respectively, in the top five spots. 

Global employment experts at Remote ranked the states for work-life balance, based on a range of metrics including minimum wage, sick leave, overall public happiness and LGBTQ+ inclusivity. 

Findings focused on how businesses in each state look after the lives of their employees and put “life” before work, report authors wrote. They defined “work-life balance” as a harmonious relationship between careers and personal lives, enabling workers to excel at their jobs while preserving overall wellbeing.

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.

Connecticut was propelled to the top spot thanks to its higher-than-average minimum wage and 12 weeks of statutory maternity leave. The state also received full marks for LGBTQ+ inclusivity and is the only one to offer a 95 percent maternity payment rate, researchers found. 

In second place, Washington state boasts the second-highest minimum wage in the country behind California, and is one of only seven states that does not levy a personal income tax. 

A high minimum wage, 12 weeks of statutory maternity leave and high LGBTQ+ rights scores also helped push New York to third place. 

The COVID-19 pandemic led many American workers to re-evaluate their priorities, evidenced by reports of high workplace burnout and subsequent quiet quitting.

Researchers ranked each state out of 100 to determine which has the most balanced combination of job demands and wellbeing. Maternity leave, health care availability and average working hours per week were also taken into account. 

New Jersey, Oregon, Vermont, Maine and Massachusetts rounded out the top 10 on the list. 

Louisiana ranked worst for overall work-life balance and was joined by Tennessee, South Dakota, Alabama and Georgia in the bottom five. 

“Healthy life-work balance means people are able to thrive in their careers while feeling rested and able to excel in their personal life just as well,” said Remote CEO Job van der Voort in a statement.  

“We’re pleased to see some of the positive results from our study and showcase that balance is being worked on across the United States despite concerns about it being the world’s most overworked nation,” he added.

Compared with other developed nations, workers in the United States are the most overworked, clocking in an average of 1,767 hours per year.

​Infrastructure, Changing America, Mental Health, Sustainability, Well-Being, burnout, California, Connecticut, COVID-19, Job van der Voort, New York, Quiet quitting, Remote, Rhode Islant, Washington Read More 

Bed Bath & Beyond warns investors of possible bankruptcy

Just In | The Hill 

Bed Bath & Beyond (BB&B) reported concerning economic figures on Thursday, warning investors that bankruptcy may be on the horizon, which sent the company’s stock price plummeting.

Preliminary earnings reported by BB&B showed slowing sales, with the $1.3 billion figure for the third quarter being about a third lower than the year before. The company also noted lower foot traffic through its stores.

BB&B said it anticipated reporting a loss of $385.5 million for the third quarter, which is nearly $100 million worse than its losses in the quarter last year. 

“The Company has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,” it said in a statement.

After BB&B released its new estimates, shares plunged by more than 20 percent in early trading on Thursday. 

In August, the company had laid out an aggressive strategy of cost-cutting, including both store closures and layoffs. It was the latest push in a string of attempts by different investors and executives to turn around the firm’s misfortunes.

“We are resetting foundational elements to create a stronger and more nimble infrastructure that aligns closely with customer demand and preference,” President and CEO Sue Grove said in a statement. “We continue to manage our financial position amidst a changing landscape and work with expert advisors as we consider all paths and strategic alternatives to accomplish our short- and long-term goals.”

​Business & Lobbying, Finance, Bankruptcy, Bed Bath & Beyond, Investors Read More 

Are SCOTUS justices now the policymakers of last resort?

Just In | The Hill 

On Dec. 27, five Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices stopped President Biden from terminating the emergency orders imposed by the Trump administration at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic that severely limited immigration to the United States to reduce the risk of contagion. Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented, explaining, “we are a court of law, not policymakers of last resort.

Gorsuch’s point is well-taken. But it is sharply at odds with the position he and the other five Republican-appointed justices took six months ago, in West Virginia v. EPA, when they rejected the Clean Power Plan adopted by President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect our environment and reduce global warming.

The Clean Air Act had directed the EPA to determine the “best system of emission reduction” and the “degree of emission limitation achievable through the application of that system,” and then impose that emission limit. But when the Obama EPA concluded the “best system” would reduce carbon pollution by transferring some electricity generation from coal to cleaner sources, Gorsuch and the other Republican-appointed justices would not allow it.

These justices did not, and could not, show the Clean Air Act does not authorize the Clean Power Plan. They conceded that “as a matter of ‘definitional possibilities,’” shifting the source of electricity generation “can be described as a ‘system’ … capable of reducing emissions.” And they acknowledged that “capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible solution.”

Yet, they decided to prevent the implementation of the Clean Power Plan by announcing a new so-called “major questions doctrine.” That “doctrine” permits the court to preclude executive agency action when a majority of the court believes the “breadth of the authority that [the agency] has asserted” and its “economic and political significance” “provide a ‘reason to hesitate before concluding that Congress’ meant to confer such authority.”

And on what basis will the court decide whether “to hesitate” about whether Congress “meant to confer” the authority specified in a statute? Will the court take testimony from Congress concerning its intent? No. The court did not do that in the EPA case. Instead, it based its decision to invoke the doctrine on its own “presumption” about what Congress intended, and its own view of what it was “likely” Congress “would do,” even though the words of the Clean Air Act show Congress authorized the Clean Power Plan.

That is a complete departure from the way the current Republican-appointed justices normally say they interpret statutes. They proclaim they are “textualists” who enforce the plain language of the law without looking at what Congress “would do” or delving into its intentions.

Their announcement that they will not follow their own “textualist” dogma if in their view there is a “reason to hesitate” about whether Congress intended what the words of a statute actually say effectively gives the court the unlimited and unchecked power to nullify or rewrite the words of any statute. The court has arrogated to itself the right to do just what Gorsuch said it should not do — assume the role of the ultimate policymaker.

The real complaint of the Republican-appointed justices is that in their view Congress delegated too much authority to the EPA in too broad a way. But under our constitutional system, the appropriate branch to address any such concern is Congress, not the court.

As Justice Elena Kagan, joined by former Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, explained in dissent in the EPA case, “The Court appoints itself — instead of Congress or the expert agency — the decision-maker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening.” The damage is not only to our health and our environment. This assumption of authority by an unelected branch of government undermines our democracy.

If Congress believes the language of a statute does not reflect what Congress intended or wants to cut back on the broad authority or directions it has given to an executive agency, it is free to amend the statute or enact new legislation. But nothing in the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the authority to do so.

The “major questions doctrine” is particularly troubling because most if not all of the current Republican-appointed justices who comprise a super-majority on the court believe in small government and that Congress should not delegate significant responsibilities to the executive branch. Their new “doctrine” will enable them to put that philosophy into practice by reducing or eliminating the authority Congress grants to the executive branch and executive agencies.

And that very nature of the “doctrine” means it will not operate in a neutral way. Most Democratic voters believe government should play a far bigger role in protecting our health, our environment and our fundamental liberties, in eliminating discrimination, and in providing a safety net, to take just a few examples, than the view of the Republican-appointed justices. These justices will, therefore, likely use the “doctrine” to restrict Democratic-controlled Congresses and Democratic presidents from doing what they were elected to do. On the other hand, most current Republican members of Congress and most conceivable future Republican administrations share these justices’ limited-government philosophy. The doctrine is, therefore, far less likely to be used against their legislation and administrations.

The risks the doctrine poses to Biden’s agenda are very real. For example, in February 2023, the court will consider a challenge by six Republican-controlled states to Biden’s decision to provide student debt relief, a policy on which he campaigned on — and he was elected president with the largest vote any presidential candidate has ever received. The six states ask the Supreme Court to invoke the “major questions doctrine” to find that Biden lacks the authority to provide the debt relief. The court should resist that invitation to again take on the role of unelected policymaker.

Michael J. Dell is a New York lawyer who litigates and writes about constitutional issues.

​Judiciary, Opinion Read More 

Credit card interest rates are heading to 20% on average — here’s the best way to pay down high-interest debt

US Top News and Analysis 

VIDEO14:2914:29
Why debt is rising in America

Credit card interest rates reached record highs last year and there is still more to come in 2023, according to Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com.

Credit card rates are now more than 19%, on average — an all-time high — after rising at the steepest annual pace ever, in step with the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes to combat inflation.

Along with the Fed’s commitment to keep raising its benchmark until more progress is made, credit card annual percentage rates will keep climbing, as well. 

More from Personal Finance:
1 in 5 young adults have debt in collections, report finds
63% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck
‘Risky behaviors’ are causing credit scores to level off

With more rate hikes on the horizon, average credit card APRs could be as high as 20.5% by the end of the year, a new record, McBride said.

Since most credit cards have a variable rate, there’s a direct connection to the Fed’s benchmark. As the federal funds rate rises, the prime rate does, too, and credit card rates follow suit. Cardholders usually see the impact within a billing cycle or two.

“The important takeaway for current cardholders is that another 1 percentage point in rate hikes by the Fed means your rate will move up by 1 percentage point,” McBride said.

A 0% balance transfer card can help

“The urgency remains — pay down credit card debt aggressively,” McBride advised.

Turbocharge those efforts with a 0% balance transfer card and refrain from putting additional purchases on credit cards unless you can pay the balance in full at the end of the month, he said.   

Cards offering 15, 18 and even 21 months with no interest on transferred balances “are still in abundance,” he added.

“This gives you a tailwind to get the debt paid off and shields you from the effect of additional rate hikes still to come.”

VIDEO2:1202:12
How balance transfer credit cards can help you pay off debt

“If you don’t take steps to knock that debt down, it will only get more expensive,” said Matt Schulz, LendingTree’s chief credit analyst.

Making the best use of a balance transfer boils down to making those payments on time and aggressively paying down the balance during the introductory period, according to Schulz.

If you don’t pay the balance off, the remaining balance will have a higher APR applied to it, which is generally about 23%, on average, in line with the rates for new credit.

Further, there can be limits on how much you can transfer and fees attached. Most cards have a one-time balance transfer fee, usually around 3% to 5% of the tab, Schulz said.

And one late payment can negate your no-interest offer.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Read More 

Peloton to pay $19 million fine over treadmill hazard

US Top News and Analysis 

In this article

PTON

Liza Lecher works out on her Peloton Tread+ treadmill on May 24, 2021 in Williamstown, New Jersey.
Michael Loccisano | Getty Images

Peloton Interactive Inc has agreed to pay a $19 million fine for failing to promptly report a defect with its Tread+ treadmill that could cause serious injury, U.S. regulators said on Thursday.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, in a statement, said the civil penalty would resolve the agency’s charges that the company had received more than 150 reports of incidents where users were pulled under and entrapped by the time it notified regulators.

The penalty also settles charges that Peloton knowingly distributed recalled treadmills in violation of the Consumer Product Safety Act.

Peloton shares were down 4% at $8.49 in early trading on Thursday.

The 150 reports included the death of a child and 13 injuries, including broken bones, lacerations, abrasions and friction burns, CPSC said.

Peloton and the CPSC jointly announced the recall of the Tread+ treadmill in May 2021.

The agreement requires Peloton to “maintain an enhanced compliance program and system of internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance” and for five years Peloton will file annual reports regarding its compliance program and system of internal controls.

Peloton said in a statement it was pleased to have reached this settlement and said “it continues to pursue the CPSC’s approval of a Tread+ rear guard that would further augment its safety features.” The company added it “remains deeply committed to the safety and well-being of our members and to the continuous improvement of our products.”

Read More 

Idaho slayings suspect agrees to extradition to face charges

STROUDSBURG, Pa. (AP) — A criminology graduate student accused of the November slayings of four University of Idaho students agreed Tuesday to be extradited from Pennsylvania, where he was arrested last week, to face charges in Idaho.

Bryan Kohberger, a 28-year-old doctoral student at Washington State University — a short drive from the scene of the killings across the state border — will be transported to Idaho within 10 days.

Students at the University of Idaho and nearby residents lived in fear for weeks as authorities seemed stumped by the mysterious and brutal stabbings on Nov. 13. Idaho police appeared to make a breakthrough, however, after searching for a white sedan seen around the time of the killings and analyzing DNA evidence at the crime scene.

Investigators have said they are still looking for a murder weapon and a motive for the killings. More details about the case are expected to be released after Kohberger arrives in Idaho and an affidavit is unsealed.

But attorneys, law enforcement officers and others involved in the case won’t be able to discuss the affidavit or other court documents after an Idaho magistrate judge on Tuesday evening issued a so-called gag order barring officials from talking publicly about many aspects of the case outside of court.

Judges sometimes issue the orders when they fear that pretrial publicity could prevent a defendant from getting a fair trial.

Wearing a red jumpsuit with his hands shackled in front of him, Kohberger showed little emotion during Tuesday’s brief hearing in a Pennsylvania courtroom in which he acknowledged facing four counts of first-degree murder and a burglary charge.

Kohberger, who was arrested by state police at his parents’ home in eastern Pennsylvania on Friday, will be held at a jail in Monroe County, Pennsylvania, until his extradition.

Kohberger’s parents and sisters sat in the front row of the courtroom gallery, behind the defense table. His mother and his sister Melissa broke down as he walked into the courtroom, sobbing quietly and holding one another. A sheriff’s deputy brought them a box of tissues. Kohberger glanced at his family briefly as he was led out of the courtroom.

Latah County prosecutors in Idaho have said they believe Kohberger broke into the victims’ home near the university campus intending to commit murder.

The students were: Kaylee Goncalves, 21, of Rathdrum, Idaho; Madison Mogen, 21, of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho; Xana Kernodle, 20, of Post Falls, Idaho; and Ethan Chapin, 20, of Conway, Washington. They were close friends and members of the university’s Greek system.

Mogen, Goncalves and Kernodle lived in the three-story rental home with two other roommates. Kernodle and Chapin were dating, and he had been visiting the house that night.

The killings have left the rural town of Moscow, Idaho, deeply shaken, and police have released few details about the investigation. For weeks, the Moscow Police Department faced heavy criticism for telling frightened residents that there was no great risk to the community, even though a suspect had not been named.

University officials hired extra security to escort students across campus, but nearly half of the 11,500-student body temporarily left campus for the perceived safety of online classes.

Would-be sleuths attempted to fill the void with their own theories online — some of them targeting friends and acquaintances of the slain students with hurtful and inaccurate allegations.

The chief public defender in Monroe County said his client is eager to be exonerated. Kohberger should be presumed innocent and “not tried in the court of public opinion,” said the public defender, Jason LaBar.

After Tuesday’s hearing, LaBar described Kohberger as “an ordinary guy,” and said that after his extradition he would be represented by the chief public defender in Kootenai County, Idaho.

Capt. Anthony Dahlinger, of the Moscow Police Department in Idaho, told The Associated Press on Saturday that authorities believe Kohberger was responsible for all four slayings at a rental home near campus.

“We believe we’ve got our man,” said Dahlinger, adding that investigators obtained samples of Kohberger’s DNA directly from him after he was arrested.

Pennsylvania State Police Maj. Christopher Paris said Tuesday that Kohberger’s warrant merited an after-dark arrest, which requires a higher standard of probable cause.

“We wanted to go in at a time when we thought it would be the safest for everybody. Safest for anybody else in the house, safest for Mr. Kohberger and safest for our people,” he said.

A tactical response team reviewed floor plans of the home, and broke multiple doors and windows when they entered, Paris said.

In her gag order — formally called a “non-dissemination order” — Latah County Magistrate Judge Megan Marshall prohibited people involved in the case from talking about anything “reasonably likely to interfere with a fair trial of this case.” That includes details about any evidence, the existence of any confessions or other statements given by the defendant, or the merits of the case, Marshall wrote in the order.

The gag order will last until a verdict is given or it modified by the court. The paper documents filed in the criminal case are still expected to be open to the public once Kohberger arrives in Idaho, however.

DNA evidence played a key role in identifying Kohberger as a suspect, and officials were able to match his DNA to genetic material recovered during the investigation, a law enforcement official said last week. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss details of the ongoing investigation.

In addition to the DNA evidence, authorities also learned Kohberger had a white Hyundai Elantra, the official who spoke anonymously said.

Moscow police had already identified a white Hyundai Elantra seen near the scene of the crime, and asked the public for help finding the white sedan. Tips poured in, and Idaho investigators soon were trying to narrow down a list of roughly 20,000 possible vehicles to find the right one.

The Indiana State Police announced Tuesday that on Dec. 15, a trooper stopped a white Hyundai Elantra on Interstate 70 for following too closely. A body camera worn by the trooper appeared to show Bryan Kohberger in the driver’s seat, the police said. At the time, there was no information available to the trooper that would have identified Kohberger as a suspect in the Idaho killings, the agency said, and he was released with a verbal warning.

Kohberger had also been stopped a few minutes earlier by a deputy from the Hancock County Sheriff’s Department for following too closely, and given a verbal warning, the sheriff’s department said.

Federal and state investigators are combing through Kohberger’s background, financial records and electronic communications as they work to build the case against him, the official who spoke anonymously said. The investigators are also interviewing people who knew Kohberger, including those at Washington State University, the official said.

Kohberger’s relatives in Pennsylvania have expressed sympathy for the families of the victims but vowed to support him and promote “his presumption of innocence.”

Investigators have asked for information about Kohberger from anyone who knows him, and Dahlinger said investigators got 400 calls to a tip line within the first hour of that request. He said they were “trying to build this picture now of him: Who he is, his history, how we got to this event, why this event occurred.”

___

Boone contributed to this report from Boise, Idaho.

source

[World] Ukraine war: Putin orders 36-hour ceasefire over Orthodox Christmas

BBC News world 

Image source, EPA

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered his defence minister to impose a 36-hour ceasefire on the Ukrainian frontline, beginning on Friday.

The ceasefire, scheduled to start at 12:00 Moscow time (09:00 GMT), will coincide with the Russian Orthodox Christmas.

Putin asked Ukraine to reciprocate, but Kyiv immediately rejected the request.

Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak said: “Keep hypocrisy to yourself.”

Mr Putin’s order followed an appeal from Patriarch Kirill, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, on Thursday morning.

Kirill asked “all the parties involved” in the conflict to “cease fire and establish a Christmas truce”.

The Russian Orthodox Church celebrates Christmas Day on 7 January, according to the Julian calendar.

Mr Putin cited the patriarch’s appeal as motivation for the ceasefire order.

A Kremlin statement said: “Taking into consideration the appeal by [Kirill], the president hereby instructs the minister of defence of the Russian Federation to impose a ceasefire regime along the entire line of contact in Ukraine” for the 36-hour period.

Mr Putin’s order called on Ukraine to reciprocate so that the “large numbers of Orthodox believers [who] reside in areas where hostilities are taking place” could celebrate Christmas Eve on Friday and Christmas Day on Saturday.

In a statement soon after, Mr Podolyak said there could be no “temporary truce” until Russian forces withdrew from all the areas they had occupied.

The BBC’s Will Vernon in Moscow says Russia’s move may be seen by some as a Kremlin tactic – to demonise Ukraine in the eyes of the Russian public if the ceasefire does not hold.

Earlier, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan asked Mr Putin to declare a “unilateral” ceasefire in Ukraine so that both sides could negotiate.

 

Read More